Skip to main content
Log in

Ectoparasitism and the role of green nesting material in the European starling

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The use of green nesting material is widespred among birds. Recent evidence suggests that birds use secondary chemicals contained in green plants to control ectoparasites. We manipulated green nesting material and ectoparasites of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to test two hypotheses: (1) ectoparasites adversely affect prefledging survival and morphometrics or postfledging survival, and (2) green nesting material ameliorates the effects of ectoparasites. We recorded fat score, numbers of scabs, tarsal length, body mass, and hematocrit level on each nestling 17 days after hatching. We also fitted each nestling with unique patagial tags and resighted the starlings for 6–8 weeks after fledging to estimate survival and sighting rates. Nests devoid of green nesting material and dusted with the insecticide, carbaryl, had fewer high ectoparasite infestations, and nestlings had significantly lower scab scores, and significantly higher body masses than nestlings in undusted boxes. However, there was no difference in postfledging survival between birds from carbaryl-treated and undusted nests. There also was no difference in prefledging survival and morphometrics or postfledging survival between nestlings from boxes with and without green nesting material. These results do not support the hypothesis that starlings use green nesting material to control nest ectoparasites. We suggest an alternative hypothesis; green nesting material is used for mate selection or pairbonding in the starling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali S, Ripley SD (1974) Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan, vols. 1–10. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DR, Burnham KP (1976) Population ecology of the mallard. VI. The effect of exploitation on survival. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 128

  • Arendt WJ (1985) Philornis ectoparasitism of pearly-eyed thrashers. I. Impact on growth and development of nestlings. Auk 102:270–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd EM (1951) A survey of parasitism of the starling Sturnus vulgaris L. in North America. J Parasitol 37:56–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown C, Brown MB (1986) Ectoparasitism as a cost of coloniality in cliff swallows (Hirundo pyrrhonota). Ecology 67:1206–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownie C, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Robson DS (1985) Statistical inference from band recovery data — a handbook. 2nd ed. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 156

  • Brownie C, Hines JE, Nichols JD (1986) Constant-parameter capture-recapture models. Biometrics 42:561–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers AD (1973) The effects of unequal catchability of Jolly-Seber estimates. Biometrics 29:79–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers AD (1979) Quantifying unequal catchability and its effect on survival estimates in an actual population. J Anim Ecol 48:863–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark L, Mason JR (1985) Use of nest material as insecticidal and anti-pathogenic agents by the European starling. Oecologia 67:169–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark L, Mason JR (1987) Olfactory discrimination of plant volatiles by the European starling. Anim Behav 35:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark L, Mason JR (1988) Effect of biologically active plants used as nest material and the derived benefit to starling nestlings. Oecologia 77:174–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JL (1987) Nylon fasteners for attaching leg and wing tags to blackbirds. J. Field Ornithol. 58:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Feare C (1984) The starling. New York, Oxford Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold CS, Dahlsten DL (1983) Effects of parasitic flies (Protocalliphora spp.) on nestlings of mountain and chestnut-backed chickadees. Wilson Bull 95:560–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms CW, Drury WH Jr. (1960) Winter and migratory weight and fat field studies on some North American buntings. Bird-Banding 31:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill EF (1979) Cholinesterase activity in Japanese quail dusted with carbaryl. Lab Anim Sci 29:349–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RF, Hardy JW (1962) Behavior of the purple martin. Wilson Bull 74:243–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly GM (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly GM (1982) Mark-recapture models with parameters constant in time. Biometrics 38:301–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl MP Jr. (1972) Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. The wood storks (genera Mycteria and Ibis). Ibis 114:15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel B (1957) A study of the breeding biology of the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris L) in North America. Am Midl Nat 58:257–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Krementz DG, Nichols JD, Hines JE (1989) Postfledging survival of European starlings. Ecology 70:646–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers LE (1922) The American swallow bug, Oeciacus vicarius Horvath (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Parasitology 20:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss WW, Camin JH (1970) Nest parasitism, productivity, and clutch size in purple martins. Science 168:1000–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH (1981) Capture-recapture models: a review of current methods, assumptions and experimental design. Stud Avian Biol 6:426–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH, Hines JE, Nichols JD (1985) Goodness-of-fit tests for open capture-recapture models. Biometrics 41:399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl Monogr 107:1–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlesland RG (1977) Effects of the haematophagous mite, Ornithonyssus bursa on nestling starlings in New Zealand. New Zealand J Zool 4:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. 2nd ed. New York, MacMillan Publ. Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromborg KL, Grue CE, Nichols JD, Hepp GR, Hines JE, Bourne HC (1988) Postfledging survival of European starlings exposed as nestlings to an organophosphorous insecticide. Ecology 68:590–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker RK, Crabtree DG (1970) Handbook of toxicity of pesticides to wildlife. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Research Publication 84, pp. 11–123

  • van Noordwijk AJ, van Balen JH (1988) The great tit, Parus major. In: Reproductive Success (TH Clutton-Brock, ed.) Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 119–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter G, Hudde H (1987) Carnus hemapterus (Milichiidae, Diptera), an ectoparasite of nestlings. J Ornithol 128:251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasylik A (1971) Nest types and abundance of mites. Ekol Pol 19:689–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberger PH (1984) The use of green plant material in bird nests to avoid ectoparasites. Auk 101:615–618

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fauth, P.T., Krementz, D.G. & Hines, J.E. Ectoparasitism and the role of green nesting material in the European starling. Oecologia 88, 22–29 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328399

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328399

Key words

Navigation