Skip to main content
Log in

Changing handling times during feeding and consequences for prey size selection of 0+ zooplanktivorous fish

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interrelationship of fish size, prey size and handling time within a 15-min feeding period was studied in three size groups of 0 + roach, Rutilus rutilus, and bleak, Alburnus alburnus. Four size classes of cladoceran prey were used to measure changes in feeding rate and handling time from initial rapid feeding to sustained feeding. Observed differences in increase of handling time between prey size classes led to a change in the prey profitability ranking of those size classes within the first 2 min of the experiments. A 1-min feeding period is interpreted as reflecting an intermediate motivational status between extreme hunger and satiation. The use of average handling times for this period revealed a substantial change in prey profitability estimates compared to previous studies which used handling times based on short-term (a few seconds up to 1 min) feeding. It is not the largest prey items a fish can handle and swallow that are most profitable, but prey of intermediate size. By this approach a closer fit between expectations derived from optimal foraging theory and empirical data on prey size selection of 0 + zooplanktivorous fish is qualitatively achieved. Optimal prey size was found to be close the mouth gape width in small fish of 15 mm standard length, decreasing to 50% of mouth gape width in fish of 40 mm standard length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1986) Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindoo M, Aravindan CM (1992) Influence of size and level of satiation on prey handling time in Channa striata (Bloch). J Fish Biol 40:497–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremigan MT, Stein RA (1994) Gape-dependent larval foraging and zooplankton size-implications for fish recruitment across systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:913–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler W, Bence JR (1984) A diet model for planktivores that follow density-dependent rules for prey selection. Ecology 65: 1885–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1993) The trophic cascade in lakes (Cambridge studies in ecology). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkley DM (1982) Selective feeding by Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) larvae on zooplankton in natural assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer JL, O'Bryan LM (1989) Changes in prey rank and preference by young planktivores for short-term and long-term ingestion periods. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1026–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer JL, Mills EL O'Bryan L (1990) Influence of prey abundance on species and size selection by young yellow perch (Perca flavescens). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:882–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Croy MI, Hughes RN (1990) The combined effects of learning and hunger in the feeding behaviour of the fifteen-spined stickle-back Spinachia spinachia L. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. (NATO ASI Series G vol 20) pp 215–234, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Croy MI, Hughes RN (1991) The influence of hunger on feeding behaviour and on acquisition of learned foraging skills by the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Anim Behav 41:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers DM (1977) The nature of prey selection by plaktivorous fish. Ecology 58:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MJ, Wahl DH (1981) Selection of small Daphnia pulex by yellow perch fry in Oneida lake, New York. Trans Am Fish Soc 110: 64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart PJB, Gill AB (1993) Choosing prey size: a comparison of static and dynamic foraging models for predicting prey choice by fish. Mar Behav Physiol 23:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann J (1986) Interspecific predictors of selected prey of young fishes. Arch Hydrobiol Beih 22:373–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirvonen H, Ranta E (1995) Within-bout dynamics of diet choice and variable handling time. in prep.

  • Holling CS (1966). The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem Entomol Soc Can 48:1–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser MJ, Westhead AP, Hughes RN, Gibson RN (1992) Are digestive characteristics important contributors to the profitability of prey? A study of diet selection in the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Oecologia 90:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser MJ, Hughes RN (1993) Factors affecting the behavioural mechanisms of diet selection in fishes. Mar Behav Physiol 23: 105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot WC, Sih A (1987) Predation. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  • Kislalioglu M, Gibson RN (1976) Prey “handling time” and its importance in food selection by the 15-spined stickleback, Spinachia sinachia (L.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 25:115–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Kacelnik A (1991) Decision-making. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 105–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzora X (1987) A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts. Hydrobiologia 146:97–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Clark CW (1986) Towards a unified foraging theory. Ecology 67:1127–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann KH, Britton RH, Kowakzewski A, Lack TJ, Mathews CP, McDonald I (1972) Productivity and energy flow at all trophic levels in the River Thames, England. In: Kajak Z, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A (eds) Productivity problems of freshwaters. PWN, Warsaw, pp 579–596

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI (1986) The common currency for behavioural decisions. Am Nat 127:358–378

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen DJ, Post JR, Mills EL (1986) Trophic relationships in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43: 1571–1581

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikheev VN (1984): Prey size and food selectivity in young fishes. J Ichthyol 24:66–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller T, Crowder LB, (1990) Effects of changes in the zooplankton assemblage on growth of bloater and implications for recruitment success. Trans Am Fish Soc 119: 483–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills EL, Confer JL, Ready RC (1984) Prey selection by young yellow perch: The influence of capture success, visual acuity, and prey choice. Trans Am Fish Soc 113:579–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills EL, Confer JL, Kretchmer DW (1986) Zooplankton selection by young perch: the influence of light, prey density, and predator size. Trans Am Fish Soc 115:716–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson DM, Facey DE, Grossman GD (1989) Estimating physiological thresholds with continuous two-phase regression. Physiol Zool 62:866–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote TG (1988) Fish in the structure and function of freshwater ecosystems: a “top-down” view. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:361–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponton D, Müller R (1990) Size of prey ingested by whitefish, Coregonus sp., larvae. Are Coregonus larvae gape-limited predators? J Fish Biol 36:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Schael DM, Rudstan LG, Post JR (1991) Gape limitation and prey selection in larval yellow perch (Perca flavescens), freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens), and black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1919–1925

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (1984) Ontogeny of prey selection by black surfperch Embiotoca jacksoni (Pisces: Embiotocidae): the roles of fish morphology, foraging behavior, and patch selection. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 18:225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (1987) Prey selection by juvenile cyprinids from running water. Freshwater Biol 17:129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory (Monographs in behavior and ecology). Princeton University Press,. Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg C, Van den Boogaart JGM, Sibbing FA, Lammens EHRR, Osse JWM (1993) Shape of zooplankton and retention in filter-feeding: A quantitative comparison between industrial sieves and the branchial sieves of common bream (Abramis brama) and white bream (Blicca bjoerkna). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:716–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl CM, Mills EL, McFarland WN, DeGisi JS (1993) Ontogenetic changes in prey selection and visual acuity of the yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:743–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanzenböck J (1992) Ontogeny of prey attack behaviour in larvae and juveniles of three European cyprinids. Environ Biol Fish 33:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanzenböck J, Schiemer F (1989) Prey detection in cyprinids during early development. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:995–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1974) The fish size, prey size, handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications. J Fish Res Bd Can 31:1531–1536

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside MC (1988) O+ fish as a major factor affecting abundance patterns of littoral zooplankton. Verh Int Ver Limmol 23: 1710–1714

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wanzenböck, J. Changing handling times during feeding and consequences for prey size selection of 0+ zooplanktivorous fish. Oecologia 104, 372–378 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328373

Key words

Navigation