Skip to main content
Log in

Nested subset structure of larval mycophagous fly assemblages: nestedness in a non-island system

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nested subset structure has been studied in archipelagoes and fragmented habitats, and has been attributed to differential colonization and extinction rates among species and nested environmental tolerances. In this experiment, we tested for nestedness in assemblages of mycophagous fly larvae. Twenty mushrooms in each of three size classes (4.8–6.0 g, 10–15 g, 21–32 g) were placed on moist potting soil in experimental cups. The cups were placed in oak and pine forests in Greenville, S.C., USA for 5 days, where they were available to ovipositing flies. Upon collection, the mushrooms were incubated in the laboratory for 3 weeks and all emerging flies were sorted by species, counted, and weighed. A random placement analysis was conducted to determine whether the species richness pattern was a sampling artifact of the species abundance distributions. The actual species richness pattern did not conform to the random placement model; most mushrooms contained significantly fewer species than predicted by random sampling. The communities were strongly nested as measured by two different indices, and the nestedness pattern was related to mushroom size. Small mushrooms usually produced no flies or a single species, Dohrniphora sp. (Phoridae). Medium and large mushrooms typically produced more species-rich communities that usually contained the phorid and Drosophila putrida, D. tripunctata, and Leucophenga varia. This core guild was nested within a more diverse assemblage that included D. falleni, Mycodrosophila dimidiata, a muscid, and two Leptocera sp. (sphaeroceridae). These patterns are tentatively explained in the context of nested desiccation tolerances, mediated by differences in mushroom size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beeby A (1993) Applying ecology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1990) Ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake JG (1991) Nested subsets and the distribution of birds on isolated woodlots. Conserv Biol 5: 58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Boecklin WJ, Gotelli NJ (1984) Island biogeographic theory and conservation practice: species-area relationships or speciousarea relationships? Biol Conserv 29: 63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger DT, Alberts AC, Soule ME (1991) Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction, and nested species subsets. Am Nat 137: 155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1973) Species diversity of seed-eating desert rodents in sand dune habitats. Ecology 54: 775–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1978) The theory of insular biogeography and the distribution of boreal birds and mammals. Great Basin Nat Mem 2: 209–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1981) Two decades of homage to Santa Rosalia: toward a general theory of diversity. Am Zool 21: 877–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman BD, Mates MA, Willig MR, Hsieh Y (1982) Randomness, area, and species richness. Ecology 63: 1121–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Orias E (1964) The ecological regulation of species diversity. Am Nat 98: 399–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113: 791–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP, Kibota TT, Singleton TA (1990) Ecology of mushroom-feeding Drosophilidae. Adv Ecol Res 20: 225–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A (1991) Nested faunas and extinction in fragmented habitats. Conserv Biol 5: 496–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak DF, Mills LS (1994) A useful role for theory in conservation. Ecology 75: 615–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1982) Dynamics of regional distributions: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon R (1995) Nested species subsets and geographic isolation: a case study. Ecology 76: 458–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1993) Highly structured fish communities in Australian desert springs. Ecology 74: 1847–1855

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1994) Ecology, 4th edn. HarperCollins College Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis GP, Worthen WB (1992) Effects of predation and microenvironment on the survival of Drosophila tripunctata larvae. Oikos 64: 553–559

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald KA, Brown JH (1992) Using montane mammals to model extinctions due to global change. Conserv Biol 6: 409–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD (1987) The principle of nested subsets and its implications for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 1: 323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD (1990) On the temporal development of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oikos 59: 330–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD, Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biol J Linn Soc 28: 65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD, Brown JH (1991) Regionally nested patterns of species composition in granivorous rodent assemblages. J Biogeogr 18: 395–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1992) Evolutionary ecology, 4th edn. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1990) Evology, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (1993) Species diversity in ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Levin B (1985) Predictable sequences of species loss with decreasing island area—land birds in two archipelagos. N Z J Ecol 8: 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Martin JL (1991) Nestedness of insular avifaunas: simple summary statistics masking complex species patterns. Ornis Fenn 68: 178–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Simberloff D (1986) What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves? Biol Conserv 35: 19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Alberts AC, Bolger DT (1992) The effects of habitat fragmentation on chaparral plants and vertebrates. Oikos 63: 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellería JL, Santos T (1995) Effects of forest fragmentation on a guild of wintering passerines: the role of habitat selection. Biol Conserv 71: 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen WB (1988) Slugs (Arion spp.) facilitate mycophagous drosophilids in laboratory and field experiments. Oikos 53: 161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen WB (1989a) Predator-mediated coexistence in laboratory communities of mycophagous Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ecol Entomol 14: 117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen WB (1989b) Effects of resource density on mycophagous fly dispersal and community structure. Oikos 54: 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen WB, McGuire TR (1988) A criticism of the aggregation model of coexistence: non-independent distribution of dipteran species on ephemeral resources. Am Nat 131: 453–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen WB, Hipp MN, Twardokus CT, Roller R (1993) Effects of ant predation and larval density on mycophagous fly communities. Oikos 66: 526–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen WB, Mayrose S, Wilson RG (1994) Complex interactions between predation, rainfall, and microclimate: effects on mycophagous fly communities. Oikos 69: 277–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen WB, Bloodworth BR, Hobbs MB (1995) Habitat variability in the effects of predation and microclimate on mycophagous fly communities. Ecography 18: 248–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright DH (1983) Species-energy theory: an extension of speciesarea theory. Oikos 41: 496–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright DH, Reeves JH (1992) On the meaning and measurement of nestedness of species assemblages. Oecologia 92: 416–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie JL, Currie DJ (1993) Species-energy theory and patterns of species richness. I. patterns of bird, angiosperm, and mammal species richness on islands. Biol Conserv 63: 137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wade B. Worthen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worthen, W.B., Carswell, M.L. & Kelly, K.A. Nested subset structure of larval mycophagous fly assemblages: nestedness in a non-island system. Oecologia 107, 257–264 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327910

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327910

Key words

Navigation