Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic urethral pressure measurements in the diagnosis of incontinence in women

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A group of 72 female patients whose incontinence had persisted despite various therapies was selected for an extensive urodynamic study. Overt neuropathy was absent in the patient group. An objectified history was taken and the patients were categorized accordingly. Filling cystometry and flow studies were performed in supine and standing positions, combined with continuous measurement of urethral pressure from three points within the urethra and EMG of the urethral and anal sphincters. Urethral pressure profiles were taken at rest and under stress conditions. The history indicated stress incontinence in 23 patients, urge incontinence in 33 and mixed incontinence in 16. Cystometry and urethral profile measurement alone confirmed the history in 80% of the stress and urge patients. Urethral pressure registration during filling, however, showed that a pathologic urethral function was involved in 40 patients (14 stress, 16 urge and 10 mixed incontinents) and, as a result, changed the therapeutic approach in these cases. This pathology was not clear from the EMG recordings or the urethral pressure profiles. Continuous measurement of the urethral pressure dynamics during cystometry can unveil pathology of the urethral function as the basic cause of incontinence and thus prevent inadequate therapies from being used for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awad SA, McGinnis RH (1983) Factors that influence the incidence of detrusor instability in women. J Urol 130:114–115

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates CP, Bradley WE, Glen ES, Griffiths DJ, Melchior H, Rowan D, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, Hald T (1979) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. J Urol 121:551–554

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cantor TJ, Bates CP (1980) A comparative study of symptoms and objective urodynamic findings in 214 incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 87:889–892

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elder DD, Stephenson TP (1980) An assessment of the Frewen regime in the treatment of detrusor dysfunction in females. Br J Urol 52:467–471

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fossberg E, Beisland HO, Sander S (1981) Sensory urgency in females: treatment with Phenylpropanolamine. Eur Urol 7:157–160

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fossberg E, Beisland HO (1982) Incompetent urethral closure mechanism in females. Urol Int 37:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frewen WK (1980) The management of urgency and frequency of micturition. Br J Urol 52:367–369

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaudenz R (1979) Der Inkontinenz-Fragebogen mit dem neuen Urge- und Stress-Score. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 39:784–792

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jarvis GJ, Hall S, Stamp S, Millar DR, Johnson A (1980) An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 87:893–896

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiruluta HG, Downie JW, Awad SA (1981) The continence mechanisms: the effect of bladder filling on the urethra. Invest Urol 18:460–465

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koefoot RB, Webster GD (1983) Urodynamic evaluation in women with frequency, urgency symptoms. Urology 21:648–651

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mahony DT, Laferte RO, Blais DJ (1980) Incontinence of urine due to instability of micturition reflexes. I. Detrusor reflex instability. Urology 15:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGuire EJ (1978) Reflex urethral instability. Br J Urol 50:200–204

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGuire EJ (1979) Urethral sphincter mechanisms. Urol Clin North Am 6:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  15. Öbrink A, Bunne G (1978) Treatment of urgency with instillation of Emepronium bromide in the urinary bladder. Scand J Urol Nephrol 12:215–218

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reed T, Andersson KE, Asmussen M, Hunting A, Ulmsten U (1980) Factors maintaining the intra-urethral pressure in women. Invest Urol 17:343–347

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tanagho EA (1979) Membrane and microtransducer catheters: their effectiveness for profilometry of the lower urinary tract. Urol Clin North Am 6:110–119

    Google Scholar 

  18. Venema PL, Kramer AEJL (1984) The clinical implication of continuous urethral pressure measurement in women with incontinence. Acta Urol Belg 52:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zinner NR, Susset JG, Coolsaet BLRA, Griffiths DJ, Jonas U, Sterling AM, Blaivas JG, Krane RJ (1983) The Great Debate. Resolved: The urethral closure pressure profile should be used for diagnosis and measurement of female stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodynam 2:81–99

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kramer, A.E.J.L., Venema, P.L. Dynamic urethral pressure measurements in the diagnosis of incontinence in women. World J Urol 2, 203–207 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327001

Keywords

Navigation