Skip to main content
Log in

Predator-mediated apparent competition between two herbivores that feed on grapevines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have been releasing economically unimportant herbivorous mites of one species early in the season and protecting grapevines against another, more damaging herbivorous mite throughout the growing season. In this experiment, releases of economically unimportant Willamette mites alone, or of predatory mites alone, failed to reduce populations of the damaging Pacific spider mite. However, where both herbivorous Willamette mites and predatory mites were released together populations of Pacific mites were reduced. This interaction between effects of Willamette mites and predatory mites suggests that predation against Pacific mites was more effective where alternate prey (Willamette mites) were available for the predators. The “apparent competition” between Willamette mites and Pacific mites, mediated through their shared predator, can be an important force in the agroecosystem although its importance varies from year to year and vineyard to vineyard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1986) Ecology. Individuals, populations, and communities. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • English-Loeb GM, Karban R (1988) Negative interactions between Willamette mites and Pacific mites: possible management strategies for grapes. Entomol Exp Appl 48:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • English-Loeb GM, Flaherty DL, Wilson LT, Barnett WW, Leavitt GM, Settle WH (1986) Pest management affects spider mites in vineyards. Calif. Agric 40:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • English-Loeb G, Karban R, Hougen-Eitzman D (1993) Relative importance of direct and indirect competition in mediating negative interactions between spider mites feeding on graphes. Ecol Appl 3:699–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty DL, Hoy MA (1971) Biological control of Pacific mites and Willamette mites in San Joaquin Valley vineyards. Part 3. The role of tydeid mites. Res Popul Ecol 13:80–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty DL, Huffaker CB (1970) Biological control of Pacific mites and Willamette mites in San Joaquin valley vineyards. Part 1. The role of Metaseilus occidentalis. Hilgardia 40:267–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty DL, Christensen LP, Lanini WT, Marois JJ, Phillips PA, Wilson LT (1992) Grape pest management, 2nd edn. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz ED (1992) Interactions of intraspecific, interspecific, and apparent competition with host-pathogen population dynamics. Ecology 73:507–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12:197–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1984) Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am Nat 124:377–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Hougan-Eitzman D, Karban R (ms) Mechanisms of interspecific competition that result in successful control of Pacific mites folowing inoculations of Willamette mites on grapevines (in review)

  • Huang C, Sih A (1990) Experimental studies on behaviorally mediated, indirect interactions through a shared predator. Ecology 71:1515–1522

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1984) Enemy-free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol J Linn Soc 23:269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, English-Loeb GM (1990) A “vaccination” of Willamette spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) to prevent large populations of Pacific spider mites on grapevines. J Econ Entomol 83:2252–2257

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Myers JH (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison DF (1990) Multivariate statistical methods, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Westoby M, Rice B (1988) Parasite-mediated competition: some predictions and tests. Am Nat 131:544–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JF, Dunham AE (1983) On hypothesis testing in ecology and evolution. Am Nat 122:602–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1990) Ecology, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1990) SAS User's guide, version 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ (1987) Indirect interactions between prey: apparent competition, predator aggregation, and habitat segregation. Ecology 68:1887–1897

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle WH, Wilson LT (1990) Invasion by the variegated leafhopper and biotic interactions: parasitism, competition, and apparent competition. Ecology 71:1461–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW, Raupp MJ (1991) Phytochemical induction by herbivores. J Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karban, R., Hougen-Eitzmann, D. & English-Loeb, G. Predator-mediated apparent competition between two herbivores that feed on grapevines. Oecologia 97, 508–511 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325889

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325889

Key words

Navigation