Skip to main content
Log in

Density-dependent foraging in the harvester ant Messor ebeninus: two experiments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Harvester ants are important seed predators in many xeric environments, and their foraging choices can influence the composition of plant communities. Seed abundance has been cited as an important factor in determining such foraging preferences. Three seed types (sesame, millet, and flax) were experimentally introduced in differing proportions near nests of the ant Messor ebeninus near the Dead Sea, in territory administered by the state of Israel. Two experiments were designed to investigate the effects of this density conditioning on two stages of the ants' subsequent foraging behavior: recruitment to seed patches and selection of seeds from within a patch. When seeds were presented in small, single-species patches, experimentally common seeds were discovered and exploited significantly faster than rare seeds, especially among less preferred seed types. When seeds were presented in large, mixed patches, however, no consistent effect of density was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey KH, Polis GA (1987) Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Oecologia 72:440–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Best LS (1981) The effect of specific fruit and plant characteristics on seed dispersal. PhD Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle

  • Briese DT (1982) Relationship between the seed-harvesting ants and the plant communityin a semi-arid environment. In: Buckley RC (ed) Geobotany, 4: Ant-plant interactions in Australia. Junk, The Hague, pp 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Davidson DW, Reichman OJ (1979) An experimental study of competition between seed-eating desert rodents and ants. Am Zool 19:1129–1143

    Google Scholar 

  • Cates RG, Orians GH (1975) Successional status and the palatability of plants to generalist herbivores. Ecology 56:410–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, MacMahon JA (1992) Harvester ant foraging and shrubsteppe seeds: interactions of seed resources and seed use. Ecology 73: 1768–1779

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1978) Experimental tests of the optimal diet in two social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny P (1975) Biochemical coevolution between plants and their insect herbivores. In: Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RD (1974) Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants, vol 1. Constituents. McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1983) The relation of recruitment rate to activity rhythms in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. J Kansas Entomol Soc 56: 277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP (1976) Arthropod predator-prey systems. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 71–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ (1985) Harvester ant foraging and plant species distribution in annual grassland. Oecologia 67:519–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Holldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, Krebs JR, Erichsen JT (1980) Optimal prey choice and discrimination time in the great tit (Parus major L.). Behav Ecol Sociob 6:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1991) Few and far between: plant population density and its effects on insect-plant interactions. PhD Thesis. University of Washington, Seattle

  • Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1976) Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition, and temporal heterogeneity. Am Nat 110:351–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrewicz AT, Kamil AC (1981) Search images and the detection of cryptic prey: an operant approach. In: Kamil AC, Sargent TD (eds) Foraging behavior: ecological, ethological, and psychological approaches. Garland STPM, New York, pp 311–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman OJ (1979) Desert granivore foraging and its impact on seed densities and distributions. Ecology 60:1085–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades DF, Cates RG (1976) Towards a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. In: Wallace JW, Mansell RL (eds) Biochemical interaction between plants and insects. Plenum, New York, pp 168–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW (1981) Foraging specializations of individual seed-harvester ants. Behav Ecol Sociob 9:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers LE (1974) Foraging activity of the western harvester ant in the shortgrass plains ecosystem. Environ Entomol 3:420–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tevis L Jr (1958) Interrelations between the harvester ant Veromessor pergandei (Mayr) and some desert ephemerals. Ecology 39:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen L (1960) The natural control of insects in pinewoods. I. factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch Neerl Zool 13:266–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG (1978) Foraging by seed-harvesting ants. In: Brian MV (ed) Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–110 Wilkinson L (1989) SYSTAT: the system for statistics for the PC (Version 4) SYSTAT, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunin, W.E. Density-dependent foraging in the harvester ant Messor ebeninus: two experiments. Oecologia 98, 328–335 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00324221

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00324221

Key words

Navigation