Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of larval intraspecific competition to stonefly growth and fecundity

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We conducted experiments in replicated circular streams to measure the effect of intraspecific larval density on growth rates, size at emergence, timing of emergence, and fecundity of two species of predatory stoneflies (Megarcys signata and Kogotus modestus, Perlodidae). Early instars of both species showed no significant effect of intraspecific larval density on mean growth rates, despite the observation that in the absence of competitors stoneflies ate on average, significantly more prey (Baetis bicaudatus, Ephemeroptera, Baetidae) than in the presence of competitors. However, larval size of stoneflies held at higher densities (two per chamber) diverged over time, resulting in a greater size variability (coefficient of variation) among Kogotus than in treatments with low densities of stoneflies (one per chamber). The effect of doubling the density of early-instar Megarcys larvae was also asymmetrical, resulting in one larger and one smaller individual. In contrast, doubling the density of last-instar stoneflies whose feeding rates declined significantly prior to emergence had few measurable consequences, except that male Megarcys, which continued to feed throughout the last instar, had lower average feeding rates in high-density than in low-density chambers, and emerged at a significantly smaller mean size. We conclude that competition between early-instar stonefly larvae results in an asymmetry of body sizes, but that competitive effects are reduced as larvae slow or cease feeding before emergence. Since larger females of both stonefly species produced more eggs, the probable cost to females of early-instar larval competition was a reduction in their potential contribution of offspring to the next generation. The cost of attaining a smaller body size for male stoneflies is unknown; but if, as in many other insects, larger males have greater reproductive success, larval competition may increase the opportunity for sexual selection among males. This hypothesis remains to be tested experimentally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (1982) Feeding habits and prey consumption of three setipalpian stoneflies (Plecoptera) in a mountain stream. Ecology 63:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Anholt BR (1988) Sources of variation in larval survival, growth and development rates and their consequences for adult survival and reproductive success in Enallagma boreale Selys (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

  • Anholt BR (1990) An experimental separation of interference and exploitative competition in a larval damselfly. Ecology 71:1483–1493

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RL (1981) Behavioural interactions and use of feeding areas by nymphs of Coenagrion resolutum (Coenagrionidae: Odonata). Oecologia 49:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RL (1986) Effects of density, disturbance, and waste products on growth of larval Enallagma ebrium (Hagen) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Can Entomol 118:325–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks MJ, Thompson DJ (1987) Regulations of damselfly populations: the effects of larval density on larval survival, development rate and size in the field. Freshwat Biol 17:357–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon PJ (1984) Habitat exploitation by larvae of Amphipsyche meridiana (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in a Javanese lake outlet. Freshwat Biol 14:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Branham JM, Hathaway RR (1975) Sexual differences in the growth of Pteronarcys californica Newport and Pteronarcella badia (Hagen) (Plecoptera). Can J Zool 53:501–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Briegel H (1990) Metabolic relationship between female body size, reserves, and fecundity of Aedes aegypti. J Ins Physiol 36:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler MG (1984) Life histories of aquatic insects. In: Resh VH, Rosenberg DM (eds) Aquatic insect ecology. Praeger Press, NY, pp 24–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Calow P, Townsend CR (1981) Resource utilization and growth. In: Townsend CR, Calow P (eds) Physiological Ecology. Sinauer Sunderland, MA, USA, pp. 220–244

    Google Scholar 

  • deMoor FC (1982) Determination of the number of instars and size variation in the larvae and pupae of Simulium Chutleri Lewis 1965 (Diptera: Simuliidae) and some possible bionomical implications. Can J Zool 60:1374–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye C (1982) Intraspecific competition amongst larval Aedes aegypti: food exploitation or chemical interference? Ecol Entomol 7:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye C (1984) Competition amongst larval Aedes aegypti: the role of interference. Ecol Entom 9:355–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Feminella JW, Resh VH (1990) Hydrologic influence, disturbance, and intraspecific competition in a stream caddisfly population. Ecology 71:2083–2094

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincke OM (1986) Lifetime reproductive success and the opportunity for selection in a non-territorial damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 40:791–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribbin SD, Thompson DJ (1990) Asymmetric intraspecific competition among larvae of the damselfly Ischnura elegans (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Ecol Entomol 15:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD (1987) Experimental studies of exploitative competition in a grazing stream insect. Oecologia 73:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway RR (1975) Sexual dimorphism in malpighian tubules of Pteronarcys californica (Plecoptera). Great Basin Natur 35:449–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley WA (1985) The effect of larval density on adult longevity of a mosquito, Aedes sierrensis: epidemiological consequences. J Anim Ecol 54:955–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1980) Aggregation, interference and foraging by larvae of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). Anim Behav 28:553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes HBN (1976) Biology of Plecoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 21:135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Istock CA (1967) The evolution of complex life cycle phenomena: an ecological perspective. Ecology 21:592–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson A, Vuoristo T (1979) Significance of stridulation in larval Hydropsychidae (Trichoptera). Behav 17:167–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DM, Crowley PH, Bohanan RE, Seely MK, Hadley NF, Gray V (1985) Competition among larval dragonflies: a field enclosure experiment. Ecology 66:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, Hassell MP (1981) Asymmetrical competition in insects. Nature (London) 289:793–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Leather SR (1988) Size, reproductive potential and fecundity in insects: things aren't as simple as they seem. Oikos 51:386–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Livdahl TP (1982) Competition within and between hatching cohorts of a treehole mosquito. Ecology 63:1751–1760

    Google Scholar 

  • Maketon M, Stewart KW, Kondratieff BC, Kirchner RF (1988) New descriptions of drumming and evolution of the behavior in North American Perlodidae (Plecoptera). J Kans Entomol Soc 61:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden JH (1989) Body building dragonflies: costs and benefits of maximizing flight muscle. Physiol Zool 62:505–521

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Crowley PH (1987) The effects of density and relative size on the aggressive behavior, movement and feeding of damselfly larvae (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Anim Behav 35:1051–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeur JE, Istock CA (1980) Ecology and evolution of the pitcher plant mosquito. IV. Larval influence over adult reproductive performance and longevity. J Anim Ecol 49:775–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajunen VI (1982) The effect of age-dependent interference on larval development in Callicorixa producta (Reut.) (Hemiptera, Corixidae). Ann Zool Fenn 19:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1991a) Mechanisms of interference competition between predatory stoneflies. Oecologia 85:521–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1991b) Habitat selection by stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1069–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Penton MA (1985) Is predaceous stonefly behavior affected by competion? Ecology 66:1718–1728

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Penton MA (1989) Mechanisms of prey selection by stream-dwelling stoneflies. Ecology 70:1203–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickup J, Thompson DJ (1990) The effects of temperature and prey density on the development rates and growth of damselfly larvae (Ondonata: Zygoptera). Ecol Entomol 15:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce CL, Crowley PH, Johnson DM (1985) Behavior and ecological interactions of larval Odonata. Ecology 66:1504–1512

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestige RA (1979) Ingestion and assimilation efficiency of Aeshna brevistyla and Hemicordulia australiae larvae (Odonata). NZ J Mar Fresh Res 13:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout T (1984) The delayed effect on adult fertility of immature crowding: population dynamics. In: Wöhrmann K, Loeschcke V (eds) Population biology and evolution. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout T, McChesney F (1985) Competition among immatures affects their adult fertility: population dynamics. Am Natur 126:521–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassmussen JB (1985) Effects of density and microdetritus enrichment on the growth of chironomid larvae in a small pond. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1418–1422

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisen WK, Emory RW (1977) Intraspecific competition in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). II. The effects of more crowded densities and the addition of antibiotics. Can Entomol 109:1475–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1988) The energetic costs of fighting. Am Zool 28:877–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L, Ludwig D (1991) Size and timing of metamorphosis in complex life cycles: time constraints and variation. Ecology 72:413–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht R (1990) Can adult stoneflies utilize what they eat? In: Campbell IC (ed) Mayflies and stoneflies. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 119–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley RM (1981) Strategies of digestion and defecation. In: Townesend CR, Calow P (eds) Physiological ecology. Sinaner, Sunderland, MA, USA, pp 109–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1981) Stability, prey density and age/dependent interference in an aquatic insect predator, Notonecta hoffmanni. J Anim Ecol 50:625–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström P (1985) Territoriality in nymphs of Dinocras cephalotes (Piecoptera). Oikos 45:351–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Slansky F Jr, Feeny P (1977) Stabilization of the rate of nitrogen accumulation by larvae of the cabbage butterfly in wild and cultivated food plants. Ecol Mono 47:209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Slansky F Jr, Rodriguez TJ (1987) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders, and related invertebrates: an overview. In: Slansky F Jr, Rodriguez TJ (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders, and related invertebrates. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 1–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Soluk DA, Collins NC (1988) A mechanism for interference between stream predators: responses of the stonefly Agnetina capitata to the presence of sculpins. Oecologia 76:630–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark BP, Szczytko SW (1988) Egg morphology and phylogeny in Arcynopterygini (Plecoptera: Perlodidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 61:143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinwascher KF (1978) Interference and exploitation competition among tadpoles of Rana utricularia. Ecology 59:1039–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KW, Stark BP (1989) Nymphs of North American stonefly genera (Plecoptera). Thom Say Found 12:1–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KW, Maketon M (1990) Intraspecific variation and information content of drumming in three Plecoptera species. In: Campbell IC (ed) Mayflies and stoneflies. Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleman M (1982) The effects of intraspecific competition for food and space on the larval development of Culex quinquefasciatus. Mosq News 42:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Taghan G (1981) Beyond selection: optimal ingestion rate as a function of food value. Am Natur 118:202–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J (1987) Density-dependent population dynamics in larvae of the dragonfly Pachydiplax longipennis: a field experiment. Oecologia 72:221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Walde SJ, Davies RW (1984) The effect of intraspecific interference on Kogotus nonus (Plecoptera) foraging behavior. Can J Zool 62:2221–2226

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall R, Begon M (1985) Competition and fitness. Oikos 44:356–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5:360–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1977a) Density-dependent aspects of growth and metamorphosis in Bufs americanus. Ecology 58:196–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1977b) Interactions of food level and population density in Rana sylvatica. Ecology 58:206–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM, Collins JP (1973) Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182:1305–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Leighton M, Leighton DR (1978) Interference competition in a tropical ripple bug (Hemiptera: Veliidae). Biotropica 10:302–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger SA (1989) Seasonal variation in the intensity of competition and predation among dragonfly larvae. Ecology 70:1017–1027

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peckarsky, B.L., Cowan, C.A. Consequences of larval intraspecific competition to stonefly growth and fecundity. Oecologia 88, 277–288 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320823

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320823

Key words

Navigation