Skip to main content
Log in

Health satisfaction: A detailed test of the multiple discrepancies theory model

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study employs calculated gaps to test the MDT model in the domain of health satisfaction. The results appear to contradict Multiple Discrepancies Theory in its present format, although it is possible that this is a result of the use of calculated rather than perceived gaps. The present findings specifically highlight the important influence of perceived current health status on health satisfaction ratings. It is argued that the basic principle of MDT (that perceived discrepancies between one's own current state of affairs and various relevant comparison levels, have an important influence in determining satisfaction) is not in doubt, but that the precise nature and point of influence of these perceived discrepancies in the formulation of satisfaction ratings may not be accurately portrayed by the current MDT model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Brickman, P. and Campbell, D. T.: 1971, ‘Hedonic relativism and planning the good society’, in M. H. Appley (ed.), Adaptation-Level Theory (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Coates, D. and Janoff-Bullman, R.: 1978, ‘Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, pp. 917–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., and Rodgers, W. L.: 1976, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfactions. (Russell Sage, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Giacomo, J. P.: 1980, ‘Intergroup alliances and rejections within a protest movement’, European Journal of Social Psychology 10, pp. 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamner, W. C. and Harnett, D. L.: 1974, ‘Goal setting, performance and satisfaction in an interdependent task’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 12, pp. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzlich, C.: 1973, Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Perspective (Academic Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., Jaspars, S. and Lalljee, M.: 1982, ‘Social representations, social attributions and social identity: The intergroup images of ‘public’ and “comprehensive” schoolboys’, European Journal of Social Psychology 12, pp. 241–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1980, ‘Satisfaction and happiness’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 385–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1982, ‘The satisfaction and happiness of some senior citizens in rural Ontario’, Social Indicators Research 11, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1983, ‘Satisfaction and happiness in a rural northern resource community’, Social Indicators Research 13, pp. 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1985, ‘Multiple Discrepancies Theory (MDT)’, Social Indicators Research 16, pp. 347–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. and Litton, J.: 1985, ‘Some problems underlying the theory of social representations’, British Journal of Social Psychology 24, pp. 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T., and Payne, R.: 1973, ‘Are deficiency scores deficient?’ Journal of Applied Psychology 58, pp. 322–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. J.: 1985, ‘Subjective evaluation of health: A theoretical review’, Social Indicators Research 16, pp. 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, S.J. Health satisfaction: A detailed test of the multiple discrepancies theory model. Social Indicators Research 17, 299–313 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319316

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319316

Keywords

Navigation