Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative investigations into the feeding ecology of six Mantodea species

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Six mantid species (Sphodromantis viridis, Polyspilota aeruginosa, Hierodula unimaculata, Parasphendale agrionia, Mantis religiosa and Empusa pennata) were studied in laboratory feeding experiments. Mantids stalk their prey and pounce on it, grasping it with their forelegs. Only living prey is selected and it is consumed directly after the catch. The predator orients itself optically, and therefore only takes notice of moving prey. The maximum size of prey which mantids can overwhelm is species-specific and depends on the prey type. On average mantids eat crickets of 50% their own body-weight while cockroaches can weigh up to 110%. Feeding experiments with 101 species of potential prey of 21 invertebrate orders showed an average feeding rate of 70% and marked differences among the predators. Polyspilota proved to be the least specialized mantid and Empusa caught the smallest amount of prey. Most of the defence mechanisms which arthropods have developed against their enemies proved to be ineffective against mantids. Neither a hard chitinous exoskeleton nor poisonous substances prevented the mantids from attacking their prey successfully. The protective secretion of the cotton stainer Dysdercus intermedius proved to be effective at least in a few instances. Even though these bugs were killed, the mantids usually refused to eat the abdomen, where the glands that produce the protective secretion are to be found. Thanatosis, as exhibited by the chrysomelid Cassida viridis and by the phasmid Carausius morosus, proved to be the best protection against mantids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartley JA (1983) Prey selection and capture by the chinese mantid Tenodera sinensis S. University of Delaware, Dissertation

  • Barrows EM (1984) Perch sites and food of adult chinese mantids (Dictyoptera: Mantidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 86:898–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier M (1934/1935) Mantodea. In Wytsman W (ed) Genera Insectorum, Quatre-Bras, Tervueren (Belgique)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier M (1968) Handbuch der Zoologie: 12. Mantodea, 2nd edn. Helmcke, Starck, Wermuth

  • Berenbaum MR, Miliczky E (1983) Mantids and milkweed bugs: Efficacy of aposematic coloration against invertebrate predators. Am Midl Nat 111:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Calam DH, Youdeowei A (1968) Identification and functions of secretion from the posterior scent gland of fifth instar larva of the bug Dysdercus intermedius. J Ins Physiol 14:1147–1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: Attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland J, Carlson AD (1977) Prey capture in mantids: Prothoracic tibial flexion reflex. J Ins Physiol 23:1151–1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T (1970) Chemical defense against predation in arthropods. In Sondheimer E, Simeone J (eds) Chemical Ecology. Academic Press, New York London pp 157–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Everton IJ, Knight DW, Staddon BW (1978) Linalool from the metathoracic scent gland of the cotton stainer Dysdercus intermedius Distant (Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Comp Biochem Physiol 63B: 157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelperin A (1968) Feeding behaviour of the praying mantids: A learned modification. Nature 219:399–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1964) The analysis of complex population process. Can Entomol 96:335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Dunbrack RL, Dill LM (1976) Predator size and prey size: presumed relationship in the mantid Hierodula coarctata Saussure. Can J Zool 54:1760–1764

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd E, Eisenberg RM, Washborn JO (1978) Effects of experimentally manipulated density on field populations of the Chinese mantis (Tenodera ardifolia sinensis Saussure). Am Midl Nat 99:58–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd E, Eisenberg RM (1978) Experimental density manipulations of the predator Tenodera sinensis (Orthoptera: Mantidae) in an old-field community. I. Mortality, development and dispersal of juvenile mantids. J Anim Ecol 53:269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Matsura T (1983) Foraging strategy of a mantid, Paratenodera angustipennis S: Mechanisms of switching tactics between ambush and active search. Oecologia 56:264–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsura T (1981) Responses to starvation in a mantis, Paratenodera angustipennis (S). Oecologia 50:291–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsura T, Nagai S (1983) Estimation of prey consumption of a mantid, Paratenodera angustipennis (S) in a natural habitat. Res Popul Ecol 25:298–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell AW (1986) The Enchanted Canopy. Secrets from the Rainforest Roof. Fontana/Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mook LJ, Davies DM (1966) The European praying mantis (Mantis religiosa L.) as a predator of the red-legged grasshopper (Melanoplus femurrubrum (De Geer)). Can Ent 98:913–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig W (1987) The prey of spiders. In Nentwig W (ed) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossel S (1980) Binocular spatial localization in the praying mantis. J Exp Biol 120:265–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler WM (1960) Ants, their structure, development and behaviour. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SF (1978) Notes on mantids (Stagmomantis, Iris) as possible predators of conenose bugs (Triatoma, Paratriatoma). Pan-Pacific Entomol 54:17–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reitze, M., Nentwig, W. Comparative investigations into the feeding ecology of six Mantodea species. Oecologia 86, 568–574 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318324

Key words

Navigation