Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic shape

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many useful notions of partial order and/or similarity and relatedness of different geometrical features of smooth shapes that occur in psychologically valid descriptions of shape have no equivalents in the usual geometrical shape theories. This is especially true where similarities are noted between objects of different connectivity: in almost all of the present theories the topological type generates the primary categorization. It is argued that such relations find a logical place only in shape theories that involve morphogenesis. Any object can be embedded uniquely in a morphogenetic sequence if one takes resolution as the parameter of the sequence. A theory of measurement is presented that allows one to define surfaces and (boundary-) curves on multiple levels of resolution. The embedding is essentially unique and is generated via a partial differential equation that governs the evolution. A canonical projection connects any high resolution specimen to lower resolution versions. The bifurcation set of the projection generates natural part boundaries. Singularities of the evolution are completely characterized as emergence, accretion and versification processes (involving topological change) and singularities by which inflections (inflection points for curves, parabolic curves for surfaces) are generated. The latter singularities involve a single process for the generation of inflections and three other processes by which the existing inflection structure may be changed. Relations with existing theories in vogue in robotics and AI, as well as in psychophysics are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum H (1973) Biological shape and visual science. J Theor Biol 38:205–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady M (1984) Representing shape. Proc Int Conf Robotics IEEE Cat No CH 2008-1/84/0000/0256:256–265

  • Bridgeman GB (1971) Constructive anatomy. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole RV (1915) The artistic anatomy of trees. Seeley, Service & Co, Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley JL, Parker AC (1984) A representation for shape based on peaks and ridges in the difference of low-pass transforms. IEEE PAMI-6:156–170

    Google Scholar 

  • DoCarmo M (1976) Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooijes EH (1984) Analysis of handwriting movements. Thesis, University of Amsterdam

  • Gombrich EH (1960) Art and illusion. Phaidon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S (1932) Anschauliche Geometrie. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman D, Richards W (1982) Representing smooth plane curves for visual recognition: implications for figure-ground reversal. Proc Am Ass Art Intell 5–8

  • Koenderink JJ (1986) Optic Flow. Vision Res (in press)

  • Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ (1981) A description of the structure of visual images in terms of an ordered hierarchy of light and dark blobs. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Vis. Psychophysics and Med. Imaging, IEEE, Cat. No. 81CH1676-6

  • Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ (1982) The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end. Perception 11:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ (1984) The structure of images. Biol Cybern 50:363–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo: In: Richter IA (ed) (1977) Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. Oxford UP, Oxford, p 174

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1977) Fractals, form, chance and dimension. Freemen, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason BJ (1962) Clouds, rain, and rain making. Cambridge UP, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JC (1870) On Hills and Dales. The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and J. of Science 4th series 40 (269):421–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger W (1975) Gesetze des Sehens. Kramer, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Milnor JW (1963) Morse Theory. Princeton University Press (MR 31 #6249)

  • Ruskin J (1971) The elements of drawing. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom R (1972) Stabilite structurelle et morphogenese. Benjamin, Reading MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin A (1983) Scale-Space filtering. Proc. 7th Int. Jt. Conf. on Artif. Intell., Karlsruhe, pp 1019–1021

  • Zadeh LA, Fu K-S, Tanaka K, Shimure M (1975) Fuzzy sets and their application to cognitive and decision processes. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J. Dynamic shape. Biol. Cybern. 53, 383–396 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318204

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318204

Keywords

Navigation