Summary
A trade-off between size and number of offspring was not found for females of similar sizes of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Moreover, for large females, clutches with higher number of eggs had larger eggs as well. This suggests that larger females produce more numerous and larger eggs because they potentially have more energy available for reproduction. Egg size diminished allometrically with clutch size. Egg size, however, did not increase offspring fitness. Therefore, this allometric decrease may be considered a consequence of phylogenetic constraints rather than a result of optimizing selection.
References
Andrews RM (1979) Reproductive effort of female Anolis limifons (Sauria:Iguanidae). Copeia 1979:620–626
Ballinger RE, Congdon JD (1981) Population ecology and life history strategy of a Montane Lizard (Sceloporus scalaris) in south-eastern Arizona. J Nat Hist 15:213–222
Brockelman WY (1975) Competition, the fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size. Am Nat 109:677–699
Crump ML (1981) Variation in propagule size as a function of environmental uncertainty for tree frogs. Am Nat 117:724–737
Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190
Kaplan RH (1980) The implications of ovum size variability for offspring fitness and clutch size within several populations of salamanders (Ambystoma). Evolution 34:51–64
Kaplan RH (1985) Maternal influences on offspring development in the California newt, Taricha torosa. Copeia 1985:1028–1035
Kaplan RH, Salthe SN (1979) The allometry of reproduction: an empirical view in salamander. Am Nat 113:671–689
Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1984) The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the “adaptive coin-flipping” principle. Am Nat 123:393–410
Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell PJ, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D, Wolpert L (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60:265–287
McGinley MA (1989) The influence of a positive correlation between clutch size and offspring fitness on the optimal offspring size. Evol Ecol 3:150–156
van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142
Parker GA, Begon M (1986) Optimal egg size and clutch size: effects of environment and maternal phenotype. Am Nat 128:573–592
Semlitsch RD (1985) Reproductive strategy of a facultatively paedomorphic salamander Ambystoma talpoideum. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:305–313
Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506
Tejedo M (1989) Exito reproductor y selección sexual en el sapo corredor, Bufo calamita. PhD thesis, Universidad de Córdoba
Tejedo M (1991) Effect of predation by two species of sympatric tadpoles on embryo survival in natterjack toads (Bufo calamita). Herpetologica 47:322–327
Tejedo M (1992a) Effects of body size and timing of reproduction on reproductive success in female natterjack toads (Bufo calamita, Laurenti, 1768). J Zool (London) (in press)
Tejedo M (1992b) Variability in viability during development and hatching success in embryos of the toad Bufo calamita. Herp J (in press)
Tejedo M, Regues R (1992) Effects of egg size and density on metamorphic traits in tadpoles of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) J Herp (in press)
Vitt LJ, Congdon JD (1978) Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. Am Nat 112:595–608
Walls SC, Altig R (1986) Female reproductive biology and larval life history of Ambystoma salamanders: a comparison of egg size, hatchling size, and larval growth. Herpetologica 42:334–345
Wilbur HM (1977) Propagule size, number, and dispersion pattern in Ambystoma and Asclepias. Am Nat 111:43–68
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tejedo, M. Absence of the trade-off between the size and number of offspring in the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 90, 294–296 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317189
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317189