Skip to main content
Log in

Resources and dispersal as factors limiting a population of the tussock moth (Orgyia vetusta), a flightless defoliator

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The western tussock moth (Orgyia vetusta) is very abundant on one stand of bush lupine (Lupinus arboreus) at the Bodega Marine Reserve (Sonoma Co, Calif., USA), but is sparse or absent on nearby stands. To determine what controls its abundance, both within the outbreak area and more globally, I performed experimental manipulations of resource availability and dispersal. To measure resource limitation, I inoculated 30 caged and 30 uncaged bushes with a realistic range of numbers of tussock moth eggs. On caged bushes, starvation led to density-dependent reductions in survival, pupal weight and fecundity. Larvae on uncaged bushes experienced density-independent ant predation on early instars and density-dependent emigration by late instars. From the results of this experiment, I predicted the density of a resource-limited tussock moth population. The predictions agreed fairly well with data from the outbreak area in 1992. To measure dispersal by the moth, which has flightless adult females, I released 30,000 tussock moth eggs at a central point in each of two uninfested lupine stands, and censused larvae weekly in a circle of radius 16 m until pupation. Median displacement over one entire generation was only 2 m, or about 2 bush radii. Rearing experiments indicated that bushes outside the out-break area are fully nutritionally suitable for the moth. I conclude that two major factors limiting the population are resources (within the outbreak area) and inefficient dispersal (more globally).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbosa P, Krischik V, Lance D (1989) Life-history traits of forest-inhabiting flightless Lepidoptera. Am Midland Nat 122:262–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour M G, Craig R B, Drysdale F R, Ghiselin M T (1973) Coastal ecology, Bodega Head, University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper J L, Townsend C R (1990) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman A A (1987) The theory and classification of outbreaks. In: Barbosa P, Schultz J C (eds) Insect outbreaks. Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer P J den (1991) Seeing the trees for the wood: random walks or bounded fluctuations in population size? Oecologia 86:484–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain M L, Eccleston J, Kareiva P M (1985) The influence of food plant dispersion on caterpillar searching success. Ecol Entom 10:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R W (1981) Population dynamics: historical review. In: The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management (Technical Bulletin 1584). United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, pp 65–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappucino N (1992) The nature of population stability in Eurosta solidaginis, a nonoutbreaking herbivore of goldenrod. Ecology 73:1792–1801

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark L R (1964) The population dynamics of Cardiaspina albitextura (Psyllidae). Austr J Zool 10:537–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsten D L, Luck R F, Schlinger E I, Wenz J M, Copper W A (1977) Parasitoids and predators of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in low to moderate populations in central California. Can Entomol 109:727–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson E D, Barbour M G (1977) Germination, establishment and demography of coastal bush lupine (Lupinus arboreus) at Bodega Head, California. Ecology 58:592–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier V G (1959) Food-plant distribution and density and larval dispersal as factors affecting insect populations. Can Entomol 91:581–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Furmiss M M, Knopf J A E (1971) The western tussock moth (Forest Pest Leaflet 120). USDA Forest Service. Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil R L (1971) The nutritional role of Lupinus arboreus in coastal and dune forestry. 3. Nitrogen fixation in the ecosystem before tree planting. Plant Soil 35:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray H C J, Hassell M P (1992) Long time series reveal density dependence. Nature 359:673–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould J R, Elkinton J S, Wallner W E (1990) Density-dependent suppression of experimentally created gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae) populations by natural enemies. J Anim Ecol 56:283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin M (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. In: Gilpin ME, Hanski I (eds) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, London, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. In: Gilpin ME Hanski I (eds) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic press, London, pp 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Karban R (1986) Effects of an early-season folivorous moth on the success of a later-season species, mediated by a change in the quality of the shared host, Lupinus arboreus Sims. Oecologia 69:354–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell M P, Latto J, May R M (1989) Seeing the wood for the trees: detecting density dependence from existing life-table studies. J Anim Ecol 58:883–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P M (1983) Influence of vegetation texture on herbivore populations: resource concentration and herbivore movement. In: Denno R F, McClure M S (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed ecosystems. Academic Press, New York, pp 259–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason R R, Luck R F (1978) Population growth and regulation. In: The Douglas-fir tussock moth: a synthesis (Technical Bulletin 1585). United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, pp 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason R R, McManus M L (1981) Larval dispersal of the gypsy moth. In: The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management (Technical Bulletin 1584). United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, pp 161–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauffette Y, Jobin L (1985) Effects of density on the proportion of male and female pupae in gypsy-moth populations. Can Entomol 117:535–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell P, Wallace A, Farrow M (1992) An investigation of population limitation using factorial experiments. J Anim Ecol 61:591–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris W F (1990) Problems in detecting chaotic behavior in natural populations by fitting simple discrete models. Ecology 71:1849–1862

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch W W (1994) Population regulation in theory and practice. Ecology 75:271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Petranka J W (1989) Density-dependent growth and survival of larval Ambystoma: evidence from whole-pond manipulations. Ecology 70:1752–1767

    Google Scholar 

  • Prairie Y T, Bird D F (1989) Some misconceptions about the spurious correlation problem in the ecological literature. Oecologia 81:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Price P W (1987) The role of natural enemies in insect populations. In: Barbosa P, Schultz JC (eds) Insect outbreaks. Academic Press, New York, pp 287–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout T, McChesney F (1985) Competition among immatures affects their adult fertility: population dynamics. Am Nat 126: 521–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddingius J, Boer BJ den (1989) On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing. 1. Power estimates and estimation errors. Oecologia 78:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff D A (1990) The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecol Monogr 60:389–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama T (1977) Population persistence and density dependence. Ecol Monogr 47:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiling P (1988) Density-dependent processes and key factors in insect populations. J Anim Ecol 57:581–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1983) Density-vague ecology and liberal population regulation in insects. In: Price P W, Slobodchikoff C N, Gaud WS (eds) A new ecology: novel approaches to interactive systems Wiley, New York, pp 312–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Swezey SL, Dahlsten DL, Schlinger EL, Tait SM (1991) Predation on Douglas-fir tussock moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and white fir sawfly (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) larvae by captive spiders from white fir in California. Pan-Pac Entomol 67: 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A (1991) Studying metapopulation effects in predator-prey systems. In: Gilpin M E, Hanski I (eds) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press. London, pp 305–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgersen T R, Dahlsten D L (1978) Natural mortality. In: The Douglas-fir tussock moth: a synthesis (Technical Bulletin 1585). United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, pp 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley G C, Gradwell G R, Hassell M P (1973) Insect population ecology: an analytical approach. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D L, Liebherr J K (1992) Flightlessness in insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:216–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Walde S J (1991) Patch dynamics of a phytophagous mite population: effect of number of subpopulations. Ecology 72:1591–1598

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickman B E, Beckwith R C (1978) Life history and habits. In: The Douglas-fir tussock moth: a synthesis. (Technical Bulletin 1585). United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, pp 30–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Woiwod I P, Hanski I (1992) Patterns of density dependence in moths and aphids. J Anim Ecol 61:619–629

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison, S. Resources and dispersal as factors limiting a population of the tussock moth (Orgyia vetusta), a flightless defoliator. Oecologia 99, 27–34 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317080

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317080

Key words

Navigation