Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary conservation of transcriptional machinery between yeast and plants as shown by the efficient expression from the CaMV 35S promoter and 35S terminator

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Current Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Complementation of fission yeast mutants by plant genomic libraries could be a promising method for the isolation of novel plant genes. One important prerequisite is the functioning of plant promoters and terminators in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Therefore, we studied the expression of the bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene under the control of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and 35S terminator. We show here that S. pombe initiates transcription at exactly the same start site as was reported for tobacco. The 35S CaMV terminator is appropriately recognized leading to a polyadenylated mRNA of the same size as obtained in plant cells transformed with the same construct. Furthermore, the GUS-mRNA is translated into fully functional GUS protein, as determined by an enzymatic assay. Interestingly, expression of the 35S promoter in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae was found to be only moderate and about hundredfold lower than in S. pombe. To investigate whether different transcript stabilities are responsible for this enormous expression difference in the two yeasts, the 35S promoter was substituted by the ADH (alcohol dehydrogenase) promoter from fission yeast. In contrast to the differential expression pattern of the 35S promoter, the ADH promoter resulted in equally high expression rates in both fission and budding yeast, comparable to the 35S promoter in S. pombe. Since the copy number of the 35S-GUS constructs differs only by a factor of two in the two yeasts, it appears that differential recognition of the 35S promoter is responsible for the different transcription rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aviv H, Leder P (1972) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69: 1408–1412

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach D, Durkacz BW, Nurse P (1982) Nature 300: 706–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen EY, Seeburg PH (1985) DNA 4: 165–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Coraggio I, Compagno C, Martegani E, Ranzi BM, Sala E, Alberghina I, Viotti A (1986) EMBO J 5: 459–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer JH, Lea K, Slightom JL (1985) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 334–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkacz B, Beach D, Hayles J, Nurse P (1986) Mol Gen Genet 201: 543–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker JR, Davis RW (1986) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 5372–5376

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1983) Anal Biochem 132: 6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluhr R, Kuhlemeier C, Nagy F, Chua N-H (1986) Science 232: 1106–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • From ME, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1986) Nature 319: 791–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmünder H, Kohli J (1989) Mol Gen Genet 220: 95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer WH, Sipiczki M, Kohli J (1986) Mol Cell Biol 6: 80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A (1983) J Bacteriol 153: 163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Plant Mol Biol Reporter 5: 387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JDG, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J (1985) EMBO J 4: 2411–2418

    Google Scholar 

  • Langridge P, Eibel H, Brown JWS, Feix G (1984) EMBO J 3: 2467–2471

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller MW, Schweyen RJ, Schmelzer C (1988) Nucleic Acids Res 16: 7383–7395

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata T, Okada K, Kawazu T, Takebe I (1987) Mol Gen Genet 207: 242–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua N-H (1985) Nature 313: 810–812

    Google Scholar 

  • On-Lee TM, Turgeon R, Wu R (1986) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6815–6819

    Google Scholar 

  • Ow DW, Jacobs JD, Howell SH (1987) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 4870–4874

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzak M, Shilito RD, Hohn T, Potrykus I (1986) Nucleic Acids Res 14: 5857–5868

    Google Scholar 

  • Pobjecky N, Rosenberg GH, Dinter-Gottlieb G, Käufer NF (1990) Mol Gen Genet 220: 314–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell P, Nurse P (1986) Cell 45: 781–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas PS (1980) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 5201–5205

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebauer K, Herrero J-J, Fillipowicz W (1988) Mol Cell Biol 8: 2042–2051

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by K. Wolf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirt, H., Kögl, M., Murbacher, T. et al. Evolutionary conservation of transcriptional machinery between yeast and plants as shown by the efficient expression from the CaMV 35S promoter and 35S terminator. Curr Genet 17, 473–479 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00313074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00313074

Key words

Navigation