Skip to main content
Log in

An index to predict outcome of surgery for reflux esophagitis based on the AFP classification

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fifteen patients with reflux esophagitis were treated surgically from July 1990 to April 1994. We evaluated these patients using the anatomic-functional-pathologic (AFP) classification both prior to and following the operation. An objective index for surgical outcome was devised. By using the grades Ai, Fj, and Pk, the i2+j2+k2 score was determined. The scores ranged from 3 to 22 (mean 9.1±5.4) prior to the operation. Postoperatively, 12 (80%) of 15 patients showed a complete recovery with a numerical score of 0, and their symptoms also disappeared. The scores of these 12 patients prior to the operation ranged between 3 and 11. However, the other 3 patients did not exhibit a complete recovery. Their scores prior to the operation ranged between 17 and 22, and the symptoms in 2 of these 3 patients persisted following the operation. These results suggest that surgical treatment for reflux esophagitis can be expected to be successful if the preoperative AFP score is less than 11.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bancewicz J, Matthews HR, O'Hanrahan T, Adams I (1990) A comparison of surgically treated reflux patients in two surgical centers. In: Little AG, Ferguson MK, Skinner DB (eds) Diseases of the esophagus. Mount Kisco, New York, pp 177–180

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feussner LM, Petri A, Walker S, Bollschweiler E, Siewert JR (1991) The modified AFP score: an attempt to make the results of anti-reflux surgery comparable. Br J Surg 78:942–946

    Google Scholar 

  3. Havelund T, Laursen LS, Skoubo-Kristensen E (1988) Omeprazol and ranitidine in treatment of reflux oesophagitis. Br Med J 296:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vantrappen G, Rutgeerts L, Schurmans P, Coenegrachts JL (1988) Omeprazole (40 mg) is superior to ranitidine in short-term treatment of ulcerative reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 33:523–529

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koelz HR, Birchler R, Bretholz A, Bron B, Capitaine Y, Delmore G, Fehr HF, Fumagalli I, Gehrig J, Gonvers JJ, Halter F, Hammer B, Kayasseh L, Kobler E, Miller G, Munst G, Pelloni S, Realini S, Schmid P, Voirol M, Blum AL (1986) Healing and relapse of reflux esophagitis during treatment with ranitidine. Gastroenterology 91:1198–1205

    Google Scholar 

  6. Festen HPM, Driessen WMM, Lamers CBH, Van-Tongeren JHM (1980) Cimetidine in the treatment of severe ulcerative reflux oesophagitis: results of an 8-week double-blind study and of subsequent long-term maintenance treatment. Neth J Med 23:237–240

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mercer CD, Hill LD (1984) Surgical management of peptic esophageal stricture. Twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91:371–386

    Google Scholar 

  8. Menguy R (1978) Modified fundoplication which preserves the ability to belch. Surgery 894:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skinner DB, Belsey RHR (1967) Surgical management of reflux esophagitis and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:33–54

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jamieson GG, Duranceau AC (1988) The development of surgery for gasstrooesophageal reflux disease. In: Jamieson GG (eds) Surgery of the oesophagus. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 233–245

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kawano T, Endo M (1992) Surgical treatment for reflux esophagitis (in Japanese). M B Gastro 2:77–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omura, N., Aoki, T., Kashiwagi, H. et al. An index to predict outcome of surgery for reflux esophagitis based on the AFP classification. Surg Today 25, 861–866 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311750

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311750

Key Words

Navigation