Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of the uniqueness point in spoken-word recognition

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The study examines the possibility of observing on-line recognition of spoken words through manipulations of the location of the uniqueness point (UP) in a gender-classification task. The subjects were presented with spoken French nouns and had to indicate by a key-press response whether each was feminine or masculine. RTs measured from word onset were significantly correlated with UP location, a finding that supports the notion of on-line processing. The effect of UP location is, however, smaller than that predicted by the original cohort theory (that recognition occurs exactly at the UP). On the other hand, it is stronger when words with respectively early and late UPs are presented in homogeneous blocks rather than in mixed order. It is proposed that the results can be accounted for by the notion of a sub-optimal lexical strategy in which some monitoring of the phonetic data continues past the UP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagley, W. C. (1900–1). The apperception of the spoken sentence: a study in the psychology of language. American Journal of Psychology, 12, 80–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. C., & Forster, K. I. (1987). A reader's view of listening. Cognition, 25, 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In R. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech (pp. 133–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. A., & Rudnicky, A. I. (1983). What's new in speech perception? The research and ideas of William Chandler Bagley, 1874–1946. Psychological Review, 90, 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A., Paivio, A., & Desrochers, S. (1989). L'effet de la fréquence d'usage des noms inanimés et de la valeur prédictive de leur terminaison sur l'identification du genre grammatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 43, 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, U. H., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction. Cognition, 25, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J., & Huttenlocher, J. (1988). Do we know how people identify spoken words? Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 684–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, P. A. (1986). A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B. & Manous, L. M. (1984). Isolation points and frequency effects in the gating paradigm. Research on Speech Perception. Progress Report, no. 10, 303–310.

  • Marcus, S. M. (1984). Recognizing speech: on the mapping from sound to word. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, S. M., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (1985). Word recognition — uniqueness or deviation? A theoretical note. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1980). Speech understanding as a psychological process. In J. C. Simon (Ed.), Spoken language generation and recognition (pp. 39–67). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1985). Speech shadowing and speech comprehension. Speech Communication, 4, 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, P. (1986). Le Micro Robert. Dictionnaire du Français Primordial. Paris: Dictionnaire Le Robert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1986). Exploring the cohort model of spoken word recognition. Cognition, 22, 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trésor de la Langue Française (1971). Dictionnaire des fréquences. Paris: Klincksieck.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radeau, M., Mousty, P. & Bertelson, P. The effect of the uniqueness point in spoken-word recognition. Psychol. Res 51, 123–128 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309307

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309307

Keywords

Navigation