Skip to main content
Log in

Loci for act recall: Contextual influence on the processing of action events

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A problem-solving account of act memory predicts stronger impacts of context than theories that explain act memory by reference to automatic processing or by reference to the operation of modality-specific code systems. This prediction was tested in three experiments, all using the loci mnemotechnique to provide contexts for memorization of subject-performed tasks (SPTs). The results of the three experiments did not provide unambiguous evidence for or against any of the rival theories. Most consistent, however, was the observation that memory under motor-encoding conditions profits less on contexts than memory under nonmotor-encoding conditions, a finding which by itself lends more support to a multicode than to a problem-solving interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, D. (1968). Temporal course of perception in an immediate recall task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events. Memory & Cognition, 14, 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1988). The content and organization of autobiographical memories. In U. Neisser & E. Winograd (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 575–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1984). Individual differences in event memory: a case for nonstrategic factors. Memory & Cognition, 12, 633–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.), Perspectives on learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (1986). Retrieval times in the usage of concrete and abstract mnemonic cues associated to loci. In D. G. Russell, D. F. Marks, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds), Imagery 2. Dunedin: Human Performance Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beni, R., & Cornoldi, C. (1985). Effects of the mnemotechnique of loci in the memorization of concrete words. Acta Psychologica, 60, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor programme information as a separable memory unit. Psychological Research, 46, 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory. German Journal of Psychology, 9, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1988). Modality-specific encoding and word class in verbal learning. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1978). Presence and absence of serial position effects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 19, 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1984). Serial position phenomena: training and retrieval effects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1986). Separate memory laws for recall of performed acts? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 27, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychologica, 66, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higbee, K. L. (1988) Your memory, how it works and how to improve it (2nd ed.). Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D. (1976). Perceptual learning and attention. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Pressley, M. (Eds) (1987). Imagery and related mnemonic processes. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J., & Schulz, R. W. (1960). Meaningfulness and verbal learning. New York: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippich, W. (1980). Bildhaftigkeit und Organisation. Darmstadt: Steinkopff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Enkodierung, Rekodierung, Retrieval und die Aktivation motorischer Programme. Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie No. 91. Saarbrücken: University of the Saarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1987). Argumente für ein motorisches Gedächtnissystem. In J. Engelkamp, K. Lorenz, & B. Sandig (Eds.), Wissensrepräsentation und Wissensaustausch. St. Ingbert: Röhrig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1984). Planungs- und Ausführungsanteile motorischer Gedächtniskomponenten und ihre Wirkung auf das Behalten ihrer verbalen Bezeichnungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helstrup, T. Loci for act recall: Contextual influence on the processing of action events. Psychol. Res 51, 168–175 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309144

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309144

Keywords

Navigation