Summary
Whilst it is currently fashionable to construct sequential models of reasoning, the results of recent experiments on conditional reasoning tasks are apparently incompatible with this notion. There is evidence of two orthogonal statistical components, one logical and the other non-logical. It has been suggested that non-logical tendencies are ‘response biases’ independent of the linguistic structure of the rule. However, certain results suggest that the ‘matching bias’ observed in conditional tasks may not occur with disjunctives.
Two experiments are reported in which subjects generated ‘subjective truth tables’ for disjunctive rules, in which the presence and absence of negative components was varied. Experiment I provided a powerful test of the matching bias hypothesis and found no evidence of its presence. The presence of negative components did, however, systematically affect performance. Experiment II, with the aid of latency measurements, provided support for the hypothesis that negatives were affecting the ease of interpretation of the disjunctive sentences, with one negative component causing at least as much difficulty as two.
In discussion, it is pointed out that the present results can be reconciled with those on conditional tasks, on the assumption that ‘matching bias’ is a special case of associational biases which are dependent on the linguistic form of the rule. It still appears necessary to retain the distinction between logical and non-logical components of the performance. However, this does not necessarily imply parallel processes underlying the data. A single muddled thought process, in which a rational sequential strategy fails to be consistently applied, could give rise to the type of data obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broadbent, D.E.: Levels, hierarchies, and the locus of control. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 181–201 (1976)
Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A.: Sentence comprehension: a psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychol. Rev. 82, 45–73 (1975)
Clark, H.H., Chase, W.G.: On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognit. Psychol. 3, 472–517 (1972)
Craik, F.I.M., Lockhart, R.S.: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 11, 671–684 (1972)
Evans, J. St. B.T.: On the problems of interpreting reasoning data: logical and psychological approaches. Cognition 1, 373–384 (1972a)
Evans, J.St.B.T.: Interpretation and matching bias in a reasoning task. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 27, 297–306 (1972b)
Evans, J.St.B.T.: Linguistic factors in reasoning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 297–306 (1977a)
Evans, J.St.B.T.: Toward a statistical theory of reasoning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 19, 621–635 (1977b)
Evans, J. St. B.T.: The psychology of deductive reasoning. In: Thinking in perspective, Burton, A., and Radford, J., (eds). London: Methuen 1978
Evans, J. St. B.T., Lynch, J.S.: Matching bias in the selection task. Br. J. Psychol. 64, 391–397 (1973)
Evans, J. St. B.T., Newstead, S.E.: Language and reasoning: a study of temporal factors. Cognition 5, 265–283 (1977)
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: The three-term series problem. Cognition 1, 57–82 (1972)
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Wason, P.C.: A theoretical analysis of insight into a reasoning task. Cognit. Psychol. 1, 134–148 (1970)
Manktelow, K.I., Evans, J. St. B.T.: Facilitation of reasoning by realism: effect or noneffect? Br. J. Psychol. 70 477–488 (1979)
Neisser, U.: The multiplicity of thought. Br. J. Psychol. 54, 1–14 (1963)
Paris, S.C.: Comprehension of language connections and propositional logical relationships. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 16, 278–291 (1973)
Pollard, P.: On the association between truth status and logical reasoning. Paper presented at the London Conference of the British Psychological Society (1978)
Pollard, P., Evans, J. St. B.T.: The effects of prior beliefs in reasoning: an associational interpretation. Br. J. Psychol. (in press) (1980)
Revlis, R.: Syllogistic reasoning: logical decisions from a complex data base. In: Reasoning: representation and process. Falmage, R.J. (ed.) New York: Wiley 1975
Roberge, J.J.: Effect of negation on adults' disjunctive reasoning abilities. J. Gen. Psychol. 24, 87–91 (1976a)
Roberge, J.J.: Reasoning with exclusive disjunctive arguments. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 30, 705–716 (1976b)
Van Duyne, P.C.: A short note on Evans' criticism of reasoning experiments and his matching response hypothesis. Cognition 2, 239–242 (1973)
Van Duyne, P.C.: Realism and linguistic complexity. Br. J. Psychol. 65, 59–67 (1974)
Wason, P.C.: Reasoning. In: New horizons in psychology I, Foss, B.M. (ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin 1966
Wason, P.C.: Self-contradictions. In: Thinking: readings in cognitive science, Johnson-Laird, P.N., and Wason, P.C. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1977
Wason, P.C., Evans, J. St. B.T.: Dual processes in reasoning. Cognition 3, 141–154 (1975)
Wason, P.C., Golding, E.: The language of inconsistency. Br. J. Psychol. 65, 537–546 (1974)
Wason, P.C., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Proving a disjunctive rule. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 21, 14–20 (1969)
Wason, P.C., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Psychology of reasoning: structure and content. London: Batsford 1972
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, J.S.B.T., Newstead, S.E. A study of disjunctive reasoning. Psychol. Res 41, 373–388 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308881
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308881