Summary
Drosophila melanogaster males were irradiated at various stages of pre-imaginal development, and mutation rates were compared between first broods of different age groups, and between successive broods in the same age group. The findings were correlated with observations on germ cell development in the larval and pupal testis. Sensitivity to the mutagenic effect of X-rays is low in all premeiotic stages. It increases suddenly and dramatically with the onset of meiosis, remains stationary through meiosis, and subsequently increases again up to a peak in the late spermatid stage when transformation into morphologically mature spermatozoa is taking place. This stage provides sperm for the first brood from males treated at about the middle of the pupal period, and mutation rate for a given dose of X-rays is here about 4 times as high as in mature sperm and about 1 1/2 times as high as during meiosis. Subsequently, mutation rate drops again gradually to the level characteristic for mature sperm. Germinal selection cannot account for any of these changes; but it may be the main cause for the slight increase in response which occurs during spermatogonial development.
Similar content being viewed by others
![](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3Aplaceholder%2Fimages/placeholder-figure-springernature.png)
Literature
Auerbach, C.: Some recent results with chemical mutagens. Hereditas (Lund) 37, 1–16 (1951).
Sensitivity of the Drosophila testis to the mutagenic action of X-rays. Z. Vererbungslehre 86, 113–125 (1954).
Auerbach, C., u. H. Moser: An analysis of the mutagenic effect of formaldehyde food. 1. Sensitivity of Drosophila germ cells. Z. Vererbungslehre 85, 479–504 (1953).
Berman, Z.: Mutation rates at different stages of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Bull. Biol. Méd. exper. U.R.S.S. 2, 16–18 (1936).
Effect of X-rays on mutation of various stages of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Izv. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R., Ser. Biol. 1939, 645–678, Russian with English summary.
Demerec, M.: Biology of Drosophila. New York: Wiley 1950.
Enzmann, E. V., and G. P. Huskins: On the use of Drosophila melanogaster as a tool in the study of delayed killing by X-rays. Amer. Naturalist 72, 184–189 (1938).
Harris, D. B.: The effect of ageing of X-rayed males upon mutation frequency in Drosophila. J. Hered. 20, 299–302 (1929).
Huettner, A. F.: The spermatogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Z. Zellforsch. 11, 615–637 (1930).
Lüning, K. G.: X-ray induced dominant lethals in different stages of spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Hereditas (Lund) 38, 91–107 (1952).
Muller, H. J.: Radiation and Genetics. Amer. Naturalist 64, 220–251 (1930).
Muller, H. J., Luolin S. Altenburg, Helen Unger Meyer, Margaret Edmondson and Edgar Altenburg: The lack of proportionality between mutation rate and ultraviolet dose in Drosophila. Heredity (Lond.) 8, 158–185 (1954).
Pontecorvo, G.: Synchronous mitoses and differentiation sheltering the germ track. D.I.S. 18, 54 (1944).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
With 10 figures in the text.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khishin, A.F.E. The response of the immature testis of Drosophila to the mutagenic action of X-rays. Z.Ver-erbungslehre 87, 97–112 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308336
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308336