Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of social pathologies in a policy context: A paradigm for action

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevention continues to gain importance among the strategies open for governmental development of social policy. This paper offers two exploratory conceptual discussions related to prevention in social policy. The first is a representation of the policy making environment with special reference to the informational requirements for the development of policy. The second is a discussion of social pathologies, broadly defined as patterns of behavior with important negative repercussions on individuals whom we refer to as victims, and of possible strategies toward the development of (at least partial) preventive measures. The two discussions are interrelated as the shape of the second is dictated by the desiderata outlined in the first. The paper is divided into five parts:

  1. I.

    Introduction: the conundrum of prevention.

  2. II.

    The Development of a paradigm of the policy context.

  3. III.

    Dependent variables: social pathologies.

  4. IV.

    Independent variables: a focus on structural determinants.

  5. V.

    Conclusion: information requirements for preventive action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Canada. Minister of National Health and Welfare. A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians: A Working Document. (Information Canada; Cat. No.: H31-1374; 1975).

  2. FoxKarl A., Jati K.Sengupta, and ErikThorbecke. The Theory of Quantitative Economic Policy. (Chicago: North Holland Pub. Co., 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. KuhnThomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd. Edition, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a review of these ideas, see WalterBuckley (Ed.) Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. (Chicago: Aldine, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a detailed discussion of the ‘closed-loop’ systems approach to policy research see: Sismondo, S. Social Indicators for Policy Research and Democratic Action, Address to the American Sociological Association Joint Meeting on Social Indicators, New York, August 27th, 1973. And also:

  6. Eberts P. R. and S. Sismondo, ‘Design and Management Principles in Policy Research’, in Alternative Methods for Public Policy Research in Rural America (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press).

  7. For a discussion of the interactions between system levels see: SismodoS. ‘Decentralized Assessment Strategies for Meeting Information Needs of Development Agencies’, in S. D.Clark, (Ed.), Problems of Development in Atlantic Canada. (Toronto, Ontario: The Royal Society of Canada, 1976). And also:

    Google Scholar 

  8. EbertsP. R., and SismondoS., A Multi-Level Policy Research Paradigm: Implications for Regional and Rural Development, San Francisco, Cal. Rural Sociological Society, August, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bibliographic references for this (partial) list of findings would be too many to include in detail here. It may suffice to cite a series of review articles such as: LevineSol and ScotchNorman A. (Eds.) Social Stress, (Chicago: Aldine, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. LangnerT. S. and S. T.Michael. Life Stress and Mental Health. (New York: Free Press, 1963, p. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. ‘Progress on Social Indicators’. The OECD Observer. No. 85, March, 1977.

  12. United States. Joint Economic Committee. Achieving the Goals of the Employment Act of 1946-Thirtieth Anniversary Review. Volume I-Employment. Paper No. 5. Estimating the Social Costs of National Economic Policy: Implications for Mental and Physical Health, and Criminal Aggression. (By Dr. Harvey Brenner, The Johns Hopkins University). U.S. Government Printing Office: 1976.

  13. ibid. p. VII.

  14. EbertsPaul R. Trend Analysis: An Overview, With an Illustration on Homicide Rates in New York and the Northeast. (Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Netherlands. Social and Cultural Report, 1976. The Hague: Government Publishing Office, 1977. Appendix 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The authors are, respectively, Assistant Deputy Minister and Senior Policy Analyst, Policy Research and Long Range Planning Branch, Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa.

The opinions and propositions contained in this paper are those of the authors only, and thus do not necessarily reflect the views, or policy positions, of the Minister of National Health and Welfare or of the Government of Canada.

The authors are indebted to Professor Paul R. Eberts of Cornell University for his helpful comments in reviewing an earlier draft of this paper. Of course, the authors alone are responsible for the contents of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, T.R., Sismondo, S. Analysis of social pathologies in a policy context: A paradigm for action. Soc Indic Res 6, 41–72 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305436

Keywords

Navigation