Skip to main content
Log in

Karyotypic conservation in the mammalian order monotremata (subclass Prototheria)

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The order Monotremata, comprising the platypus and two species of echidna (Australian and Nuigini) is the only extant representative of the mammalian subclass Prototheria, which diverged from subclass Theria (marsupials and placental mammals) 150–200 million years ago. The 2n=63♂, 64♀ karyotype (newly described here) of the Nuigini echidna is almost identical in morphology and G-band pattern to that of the Australian echidna, from which it diverged about a million years ago. The karyotype of the platypus (2n=52) has several features in common with those of the echidna species; six pairs of large autosomes, many pairs of small (but not micro-) chromosomes, and a series of small unpaired chromosomes which form a multivalent at meiosis. Comparison of the G-band patterns of platypus and echidna autosomes reveals considerable homology. Chromomycin banding demonstrates GC-rich heterochromatin at the centromeres of many platypus and echidna chromosomes, and at the nucleolar organizing regions; some of this heterochromatin C-bands weakly in platypus (but not echidna) spreads. Late replication banding patterns resemble G-banding patterns and confirm the homologies between the species. Striking heteromorphism between chromosomes of some of the large autosomal pairs can be accounted for in the echidna by differences in amount of chromomycin-bright, late replicating heterochromatin. The sex chromosomes in all three species also bear striking homology, despite the difference in sex determination mechanism between platypus (XX/XY) and the echidna species (X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y). The platypus X and echidna X1 each represent about 5.8% of haploid chromosome length, and are G-band identical. Y chromosomes are similar between species, and are largely homologous to the X (or X1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer M, Flannery TF, Ritchie A, Molnar RE (1985) First Mesozoic mammal from Australia — an early Cretaceous monotreme. Nature 318:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Bick YAE, Jackson WD (1967a) A mammalian X-O sex-chromosome system in the monotreme Tachyglossus aculeatus determined from leucocyte cultures and testicular preparations. Am Nat 101:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Bick YAE, Jackson WD (1967b) Karyotype of the monotremes Ornithorhynchus anatinus (platypus) and Tachyglossus aculeatus (echidna), Nature 214:600–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Bick YAE, Sharman GB (1975) The chromosomes of the platypus (Ornithorhynchus:Monotremata). Cytobios 14:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bick YAE, Murtagh CE, Sharman GB (1973) The chromosomes of an egg-laying mammal, Tachyglossus aculeatus (the echidna). Cytobios 7:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom SE, Goodpasture C (1976) An improved technique for selective silver staining of nucleolar organizer regions in human chromosomes. Hum Genet 34:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson GW, Graves JAM (1984) Gene mapping in marsupials and monotremes. I. The chromosomes of rodent-marsupial (Macropus) cell hybrids, and gene assignments to the X chromosome of the grey kangaroo. Chromosoma 91:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B (1979) Chromosomal evolution in primates: tentative phylogeny from Microcebus murinus (prosimian) to man. Hum Genet 48:251–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum S, Krumins E (1983) A simple and reliable method of chromosome banding for prenatal cytogenetics using a bromodeoxyuridine pulse. Prenat Diagn 3:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves JAM (1987) Marsupial and monotreme gene maps. In: O'Brien SJ (ed) Genetic maps 4. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, pp 501–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopson JA (1970) The classification of non-therian mammals. J Mamm 51:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Gene Mapping 8 (1985) Eighth International Workshop of Human Gene Mapping. Cytogenet Cell Genet 40

  • Kemp TS (1983) The relationships of mammals. Zool J Linn Soc 77:353–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama Y, Yoshida MC, Sasaki M (1980) An improved silver staining technique for nucleolus organizer regions by using nylon cloth. Jpn J Hum Genet 25:229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Leversha M, Sinfield C, Webb G (1980) Rapid and reliable methods for the G- and C-banding of human and other mammalian chromosomes. Aust J Med Lab Sci 1: 139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthey R (1949) Les chromosomes des vertebrees. F. Rouge, Lucerne

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray P (1984) Furry egg-layers — The monotreme radiation. In: Archer M, Clayton G (eds) Vertebrate zoogeography and evolution in Australasia. Hesperian Press, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh CE (1977) A unique cytogenetic system in monotremes. Chromosoma 65:37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh CE (1978) Cytogenetics of the monotremes — sex chromosomes, chromosome polymorphisms and dose compensation for X chromosomes. M.Sc. thesis, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash WG, O'Brien SJ (1982) Conserved regions of homologous G-banded chromosomes between orders in mammalian evolution: carnivores and primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:6631–6635

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S (1967) Sex chromosomes and sex linked genes. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Olert J (1979) Interphase studies with a simplified method of silver staining of nucleoli. Experientia 35:283–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Rofe R, Hayman D (1985) G-banding evidence for a conserved complement in the marsupialia. Cytogenet Cell Genet 39:40–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer D (1976) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58:307–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer D (1981) Counter stain-enhanced chromosome banding. Hum Genet 57:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Brink J (1959) L'expression morphologique de la diagametie chez les sauropsides et les monotremes. Chromosoma 10:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press

  • Whittacker RG, Thompson EOP (1974) Studies on monotreme proteins. V. Amino acid sequences of the α-chain of haemoglobin from the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus. Aust J Biol Sci 27:591–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley JM, Graves JAM (1984) Two monotreme cell lines, derived from female platypuses (Ornithorhynchus anatinus; Monotremata, Mammalia). In Vitro 20:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley JM, Graves JAM (1988 a) Sex chromosome homology and incomplete, tissue-specific X inactivation suggests that monotremes represent an intermediate stage of mammalian sex chromosome evolution. J Hered, in press

  • Wrigley JM, Graves JAM (1988b) Gene mapping in marsupials and monotremes. V. Synteny between HPT and PGK in the platypus. Aust J Biol Sci, in press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wrigley, J.M., Graves, J.A.M. Karyotypic conservation in the mammalian order monotremata (subclass Prototheria). Chromosoma 96, 231–247 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302363

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302363

Keywords

Navigation