Skip to main content
Log in

The segmental effect of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation on vertebral rotation, rib hump and the thoracic cage in idiopathic scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The segmental effect of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation (CDI) on the spine and thoracic cage was investigated in 38 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by preoperative and postoperative postero-anterior and lateral radiographs and computed tomography from T1 to S1. Mean Cobb angle decreased by 67%. The T5–T12 kyphosis in the hypokyphotic patients increased on average by 8.4° (P<0.001). Average preoperative as well as postoperative maximal vertebral rotation was located at the apex level, and was reduced from 19.0° to 14.3° (P<0.001). All vertebrae between the upper and lower instrumented vertebrae were significantly derotated. Average derotation for the apical zone was 4.8° (P<0.001), for the upper instrumented zone it was 2.5° (P<0.01), and for the lower instrumented zone it was 2.6° (P<0.01). Vertebral derotation was significantly higher in the apical zone than in the upper and lower instrumented zones. The apical rib hump index (RHi) decreased by 38% (P<0.001) and the cumulative RHi for the five apical levels decreased by 34% (P<0.001). The RHi for the two levels above and below the instrumentation each decreased by 20% (n.s.). No significant increase in sagittal or transverse rib cage diameter at any level was observed. The translation in the coronal plane of the apical vertebra of major right thoracic curves improved significantly (P<0.001). The preoperative flexibility index of the major curve correlated positively (r=0.47) with derotation at the apex level (P<0.01). However, no correlation was found between flexibility index and reduction of RHi at the apex level. Vertebral derotation did not correlate with reduction in RHi at any level. The study shows that CDI results in a postoperative three-dimensional improvement of the spine and a limited improvement of the thoracic cage, with no tendency towards a worsened deformity at any level within or outside the instrumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaro S, Dahlborn M (1981) Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal and rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography. Spine 6:460–467

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aaro S, Ohlund C (1984) Scoliosis and pulmonary function. Spine 9:220–222

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aaro S, Dahlborn M, Svensson L (1978) Estimation of vertebral rotation in structural scoliosis by computer tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn 19:990–992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adams W (1865) Lectures on the pathology and treatment of lateral and other forms of curvature of the spine. Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong GWD, Livermore NB, Suzuki N, Armstrong J (1982) Nonstandard vertebral rotation in scoliosis screening patients: its prevalence and relation to the clinical deformity. Spine 7:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernhardt M, Bridwell K (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14:717–721

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradford DS, Blatt JM, Rasp F (1983) Surgical management of severe thoracic lordosis: a new technique to restore normal kyphosis. Spine 8:420–428

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradford DS, Lonstein JE, Moe JH, Ogilvie JW, Winter R (1987) Moe's textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 63–64

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bridwell K, Betz R, Capelli AM, Huss G, Harvey C (1990) Sagittal plane analysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 15:921–926

    Google Scholar 

  10. Closkey RF, Schultz A (1993) Rib cage deformities in scoliosis: spine morphology, rib cage stiffness, and tomography imaging. J Orthop Res 11:730–737

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Lect 5:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M (1988) New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 227:10–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cundy PJ, Paterson DC, Hillier TM, Sutherland AD, Stephen JP, Foster B (1990) Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation and vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:670–674

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ecker ML, Betz RR, Trent PS, et al (1988) Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 13:1141–1144

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gray JM, Smith BW, Ashley RK, LaGrone MO, Mall J (1991) Derotational analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 16:S391-S393

    Google Scholar 

  16. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford D (1983) The selection of the fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:1302–1314

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krismer M, Bauer R, Sterzinger W (1992) Scoliosis correction by Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 17:S263-S269

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Blanke K (1992) Analysis of pulmonary function and axis rotation in adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 5:16–25

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ogilvie JW, Schendel M (1988) Calculated thoracic volume as related to parameters of scoliosis correction. Spine 13:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shufflebarger HL, Gepstein R, Clark R (1987) Recovery of pulmonary function after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Orthop Trans 11:498–499

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shufflebarger HL, Ellis RD, Clark C (1989) Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Trans 13:79–80

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wemyss-Holden SA, Burwell RG, Jacobs KJ, et al. (1993) Segmental evaluation and prediction of the effects of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation on the back shape and radiological deformity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: surgical and aetiological implications. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75, [Suppl II]:175

    Google Scholar 

  23. Willers U, Hedlund R (1990) Comparison of two measurements of vertebral rotation in scoliosis, Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 237:51

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willers U, Hedlund R, Aaro S (1993) Mid-term effects of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation on the configuration of the spine and the thoracic cage in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winter RB, Lovell WW, Moe J (1975) Excessive thoracic lordosis and loss of pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:972–977

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wood K, Transfeldt EE, Ogilvie JW, Schendel MJ, Bradford D (1991) Rotational changes of the vertebral-pelvic axis following Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 16:S404-S407

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Willers, U., Transfeldt, E.E. & Hedlund, R. The segmental effect of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation on vertebral rotation, rib hump and the thoracic cage in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 5, 387–393 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301966

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301966

Key words

Navigation