Skip to main content
Log in

The corals Acropora palifera and Acropora cuneata are genetically and ecologically distinct

  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Two of the most abundant corals of the Great Barrier Reef Acropora cuneata and Acropora palifera, can be distinguished reliably by conventional taxonomic methods only if large specimens of both species are collected from the same uniform biotope. In this study gross and microscopic examination of the corallite structures of large coralla, collected from a reef crest biotope, were used to confirm the assignment of these specific names to two electrophoretically distinct groups of corals. Identifications based on genetic and morphological data gathered from small fragments of coralla collected from five different sites were in agreement for two sites within which skeletal data were adequate for taxonomic purposes (i.e. one reef crest and one outer lagoon site). However, specimens collected from the other three sites could be identified reliably only by using the electrophoretic data. These results confirm that small fragments from diverse habitats may not be adequate for morphologically based identification. The application of electrophoretic identifications to the results of an earlier electrophoretic survey of 76 sites on 11 reefs revealed that, although A. palifera and A. cuneata frequently co-occur, they have significantly different habitat distributions. Acropora cuneata is more commonly associated with high energy environments such as the reef crest, whereas A. palifera occurs most commonly in the sheltered reef lagoons and on the deeper reef slopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayre DJ, BL Willis (1988) Population Structure in the coral Pavona cactus: clonal genotypes show little phenotypic plasticity. Mar Biol 99:495–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster AB (1979) Phenotypic plasticity in the reef corals Montastrea annularis (Ellis and Solander) and Sidastrea siderea (Ellis and Solander). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 39:25–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojis BL (1986a) Sexual reproduction in Acropora (Isopora) species (Coelenterata: Scleractinia) I. A. cuneata and A. palifera on Heron Island reef, Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 91:291–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojis BL (1986b) Sexual reproduction in species Acropora (Isopora) (Coelenterata: Scleractinia). II. Latitudinal variation in A. palifera from the Great Barrier Reef and Papua New Guinea. Mar Biol 91:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlhorst SL (1984) The use of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in coral taxonomy. Palaeontogr Am 54:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JK, Chalker BE, Dunlap WC (1983) Bathymetric adaption of reef-building corals at Davies Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. I. Long-term growth responses of Acropora formosa (Dana 1846). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 73:11–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts DC (1978) Differentiation in coral populations. Atoll Res Bull 220:55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts DC (1984) Natural selection in experimental populations of reef-building corals (Scleractinia). Evolution 38:1059–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson BJ, Baverstock PR, Adams M (1986) Allozyme electrophoresis: a handbook for animal systematics and population studies. Academic Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart JA (1984a) Genetical structure within populations of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 81:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart JA (1984b) Genetic differentiation amongst populations of the coral Pocillopora damicornis of southwestern Australia. Coral Reefs 3:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN (1986) Corals of Australia and the Indo-Pacific. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, 644pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN (1988) Comparisons between the hermatypic corals of the southern Ryukyu Islands of Japan and the Great Barrier Reef of Australia. Galaxea 7:211–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN (1990a) Checklist of the hermatypic corals of Vanuatu. Pac Sci 44:51–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN (1990b) Re-examination of the reef corals of Cocos (Keeling) Atoll. Rec Western Aust Mus 14:553–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN, Hodgson G (1989) Annotated checklist of the hermatypic corals of the Philippines. Pac Sci 43:234–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN, Kelley R (1988) Species stability in reef corals of Papua New Guinea and the Indo-Pacific. Assoc Austr Palaeontol Mem 6:69pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN, Marsh LM (1988) Hermatypic corals of Western Australia. Rec Western Aust Mus 29 (Suppl):136pp

  • Veron JEN, Pichon M (1976) Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Part I. Families Thamnasteriidae, Astroceniidae, Pocilloporidae. Monogr Ser Aust Inst Mar Sci 1:1–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Veron JEN, Wallace CC (1984) Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Part V. Familiy Acroporidae. Monogr Ser Aust Inst Mar Sci 6:1–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis BL (1985) Phenotypic plasticity versus phenotypic stability in the reef corals Turbinaria mesenterina and Pavona cactus. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp 4:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis BL, Ayre DJ (1985) Asexual reproduction and genetic determination of growth form in the coral Pavona cactus: biochemical genetic and immunogenic evidence. Oecologia 65:516–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1974) Biostatical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayre, D.J., Veron, J.E.N. & Dufty, S.L. The corals Acropora palifera and Acropora cuneata are genetically and ecologically distinct. Coral Reefs 10, 13–18 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301901

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301901

Keywords

Navigation