Skip to main content
Log in

Sex ratios in bumble bee colonies: Complications due to orphaning?

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Highly male-biased investment ratios (1:2.86, F:M, biomass wet weight) were found among reproductives reared by 32 Bombus terricola colonies set out in the field and 35 B. melanopygus colonies held in laboratory confinement. The numerical sex ratios were almost identical for the two species (1 queen to 6.1 males). Most of the males were produced early in the season by small weak colonies. It is argued that in a population where some colonies are ‘orphaned’ and rear only males, female-biased sex ratios are expected among the surviving queen-producing colonies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD, Sherman PW (1977) Local mate competition and parental investment in social insects. Science 196:494–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford FA (1978) Fisher's theory of the sex ratio applied to the social hymenoptera. J Theor Biol 72:701–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers JM (1979) The evolution of sex-ratio strategies in Hymenopteran societies. Am Nat 114:818–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnair MR (1978) An ESS for the sex ratio in animals with particular reference to the social hymenoptera. J Theor Biol 70:449–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan KM (1978) Sex ratio of parental investment in colonies of the social wasp Polistes fuscatus. Science 199:1354–1356

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster G, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster G, Eshel I, Cohen D (1977) Worker-queen conflict and the evolution of social insects. Theor Pop Biol 12:49–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen RE, Plowright RC (1980) Abdominal pile color dimorphism in the bumble bee Bombus melanopygus. J Hered 71:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowright RC (1967) On the distribution of bumblebees in Norfolk. Trans Norfolk Norwich Nat Soc 21:48–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowright RC, Jay SC (1966) Rearing bumble bee colonies in captivity. J Apic Res 5:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy N (1979) Brood bionomics of Bombus ruderatus in New Zealand (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can Entomol 111:865–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. mcGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1979) The evolution of social interactions by family selection. Am Nat 113:399–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb MC (1961) The biology of the bumblebees of a limited area in eastern Nebraska. PhD dissertation, University of Nebraska

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Owen, R.E., Rodd, F.H. & Plowright, R.C. Sex ratios in bumble bee colonies: Complications due to orphaning?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7, 287–291 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300669

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300669

Keywords

Navigation