Skip to main content
Log in

Predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals: differences between populations and individuals

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

When minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus) detect a stalking pike (Esox lucius) one of their first responses is to perform ‘inspection behaviour’ during which individuals or small groups approach the predator. This paper compares the inspection behaviour of two contrasting groups of minnows: Dorset minnows which have been heavily predated by pike for many thousands of years and Gwynedd minnows which have spent an equivalent period of time in a pike free environment. Minnows sympatric with pike inspected a realistic model pike more frequently and in larger shoals. Although they commenced inspection earlier they were more timid and kept a greater distance between themselves and the predator. After an inspection they were less likely to recommence foraging than minnows from the Gwynedd population. Individual differences in inspection found within the two populations suggest that selfish behaviour was present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertram BCR (1978) Living in groups: predators and prey. in: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 64–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1978) The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. 1. teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z Tierpsychol 48:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1974) The escape respone of the of the zebra danio (Brachydani rerio), II. the effect of experience. Anim Behav 22:723–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominey WJ (1983) Mobbing in colonially nesting fishes, especially the blue-gill, Lepomis macrochirus. Copeia 4:1086–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest HE (1907) The vertebrate fauna of North Wales, Witherby, London

    Google Scholar 

  • George CJW (1960) Behavioral interaction of the pickerel (Esox niger and Esox americanus) and the mosquitofish (Gambusia patruelis). PhD thesis, Harvard University

  • Giles N (1984) Development of the overhead fright response in wild and predator-naive three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Anim Behav 32:276–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart PJB, Connellan B (1984) Cost of prey capture, growth rate and ration size in in pike Esox lucius L., as functions of prey wight. J Fish Biol 25:279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA (1976a) An investigation of the territorial behaviour of 3-spined sticklebacks using Principal Components Analysis. Anim Behav 24:822–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA (1976b) A comparison of the reaction of stick-lebacks in different reproductive conditions towards conspecifics and predators. Anim Behav 24:694–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA (1984) Some ethical issues raised by studies of predation and aggression. Anim Behav 32:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Girling S (1986) Predator recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows. Anim Behav 34:510–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Oulton WJ, Pitcher TJ (1985) Vigilant behaviour and shoal size in minnows. Z Tierpsychol 67:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1986) Provenance, shoal size and the organisation of predator evasion behaviour in minnows. Proc R Soc. London B 39 (in press)

  • Maitland PS (1972) A key to the freshwater fishes of the British Isles. Freshwater Biological Association, scientific publication No. 27, Windermere, England

  • Mann RHK (1982) The annual food consumption and prey preferences of pike (Esox lucius) in the River Frome, Dorset. J Anim Ecol 51:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell H (1904) British fresh-water fishes. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (1984) A predators cost of overcoming the confusion effect of swarming prey. Anim Behav 32:1157–1162

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta PJ (1983) Response by potential prey to coral reef fish predators. Anim Behav 31:1257–1259

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill SRStJ, Cullen JM (1974) Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. J Zool (Lond) 172:549–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ (1980) Some ecological consequences of fish school volumes. Freshwater Biol 10:539–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ (1986) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, Beckenham Kent

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ, Kennedy GJA (1977) The longevity and quality of fin marks made with a jet innoculator. Fish Mgmt 8:16–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ, Green D, Magurran AE (1986) Dicing with death: predator inspection behaviour in minnows. J Fish Biol 28: 439–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Seghers B (1974) Schooling behaviour in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): an evolutionary response to predation. Evolution 28:486–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Varley ME (1967) British freshwater fishes. Buckland Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1982) Avoidance responses of fathead minnows to strikes by four teleost predators. J Comp Physiol 147: 371–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1984) Form and function in fish swimming. Sci Am 251:58–69

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magurran, A.E. Predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals: differences between populations and individuals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19, 267–273 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300641

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300641

Keywords

Navigation