Skip to main content
Log in

The role of distance, familiarity, and time of day in Carolina wrens responses to conspecific songs

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We tested two predictions of the ranging hypothesis (Morton 1982) which suggests that: (1) For distance estimation of singing intruders from them, birds compare degraded songs they hear to undegraded songs in their memory. (2) The strength of response of birds to songs depends on how well they can range the songs as coming from inside or outside the territory.

In accordance with first prediction we found that, Carolina wrens discriminate significantly between songs played from outside to those played inside their territories only if they are familliar with the song type played (Fig. 1). In accordance with the second prediction, on the average, the birds in our study responded stronger to unfamiliar than to familiar songs when these were played from outside the territory, but stronger to familiar than to unfamiliar songs when played inside it (Fig. 2). We concluded that this was because they could range the familiar songs with greater certainty.

The variance in the data was, in part, due to changes in the birds' responses during the day. We report for the first time, an increase in the strength of territorial defense of birds later in the morning, accompanied by a decrease in singing in response to song playback. We suggest that these changes reflect an increase in energy gain and worse acoustic conditions later in the day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker PH (1982) The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds. vol 1, pp 214–244

  • Bjerke TK (1984) The response of male Redwings Turdus iliacus to playback of different dialects. Fauna [Norv Ser C] Cinclus 7:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Borror DJ (1956) Variation in Carolina Wren songs. Auk 73:211–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz EA (1981) The effect of stimulus presentation sequence on the response of Red-winged Blackbrids in playback studies. Auk 98:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu PR (1979) Geographic variation in song of island and mainland populations of the Carolina Wren. MS Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabelsteen T (1984) Variation in the response of freeliving Blackbirds Turdus merula to playback of song. II. effect of time of day, reproductive status and number of experiments. Z Tierpsychol 65:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Falls JB (1982) Individual recognition by sound in birds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 2, pp 237–278

  • Falls JB, Krebs JR, McGregor PK (1982) Song matching in the Great Tit (Parus major): the effect of similarity and familiarity. Anim Behav 30:997–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Gish SL, Morton ES (1981) Structural adaptations to local habitat acoustics in Carolina Wren songs. Z Tierpsychol 56:74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman P (1973) Song recognition by Field Sparrows. Auk 90:106–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Henwood K, Fabrick A (1979) A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimization. Am Nat 114:260–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik A, Krebs JR (1983) The dawn Chorus in the Great Tit (Parus major): proximate and ultimate causes. Behaviour 83:287–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1981) Song matching in the Great Tit Parus major L. Anim Behav 29:918–923

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Falls JB (1984) The response of Western Meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) to the playback of degraded and undegraded songs. Can J Zool 62:2125–2128

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1984) Sound degradation a distance cue in Great Tit (Parus major) song. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 108:17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1982) Grading, discreteness, redundancy and motivational-structural rules. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds. Academic Press, New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1986) Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds. Behaviour (in press)

  • Morton ES, Gish SL, Van der Voort M (1986) On the learning of degraded and undegraded songs in the Carolina Wren. Anim Behav 34:815–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrinovich L, Patterson TL (1980) Field studies of habituation: III. Playback contingent on the response of the Whitecrowned Sparrow. Anim Behav 28:742–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards DG (1981) Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the Carolina Wren. Auk 98:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson BS (1985) Effects of location in territory and distance from neighbours on the use of song repertoires by Carolina Wrens. Anim Behav 33:793–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden JS, Falls JB (1959) Differential response of male Ovenbrds to recorded songs of neighboring and more distant individuals. Auk 76:343–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm K, Comtesse H, Pflumm W (1982) Einfluss der Konzentration der Zuckerlösung auf den Gesang und das Balzverhalten des Gelbbauchnektarvogels (Nectarinia venusta). Z Tierpsychol 60:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC (1984) The conflict between feeding and territorial defence in the Great Tit. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:103–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shy, E., Morton, E.S. The role of distance, familiarity, and time of day in Carolina wrens responses to conspecific songs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19, 393–400 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300541

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300541

Keywords

Navigation