Skip to main content
Log in

Competitive structure and fiscal policy

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using new measures to compare both the 48 states and 52 upstate New York counties, this research reformulates V. O. Key's hypothesis that noncompetitive systems benefit upper socioeconomic groups while competitive systems favor the lower classes. In designing these tests, we returned to Key's original conceptualization, which, contrary to the subsequent research that claimed to test his hypothesis, did not separate and oppose the political and economic sectors. In line with Key's formulation, we find that competitive political structure goes hand in hand with competitive economic structure and together they determine an array of fiscal policies that are different from those of noncompetitive political-economic systems. This return to the original sense of the hypothesis resolves many of the puzzling findings that have been generated in the last several decades. Democratic party affiliation and urban differentiation also affected revenues and expenditures. These same characteristics were previously shown to affect poverty and social pathology. That they now affect public policy for dealing with these problems means that those caught in the web of poverty are in double jeopardy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • AlfordR. R., and FriedlandR.: 1975, ‘Political participation and public policy’, Annual Review of Sociology 1, pp. 429–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoomsB. H., and HalldorsonJ. R.: 1973, ‘The politics of redistribution: a reformulation’, The American Political Science Review 67, pp. 924–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • CarminesE. G.: 1974, ‘The mediating influence of state legislatures on the linkage between interparty competition and welfare policies’, The American Political Science Review 68, pp. 1118–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W.: 1967, A Survey of Legislative Services in the Fifty States (Citizens Conference on State Legislatures, Kansas City, Mo.).

  • CnuddeC. F., and McCroneD. J.: 1969, ‘Party competition and welfare policies in the American states’, The American Political Science Review 63, pp. 858–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • DawsonR. E., and RobinsonJ. A.: 1963, ‘Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states’, The Journal of Politics 25, pp. 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeonR. E.: 1973, ‘Politics, economic surplus and redistribution in the American states: a test of theory’, The American Journal of Political Science 17, pp. 769–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • DurkheimE.: 1933, The Division of Labor in Society (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • DyeT. R.: 1966, Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States (Rand McNally, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • FentonJ. H.: 1966, People and Parties in Politics: Unofficial Makers of Public Policy (Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, Ill.).

    Google Scholar 

  • FentonJ. H., and ChamberlayneD. W.: 1969, ‘The literature dealing with the relationships between political processes, socioeconomic conditions and public policies in the American states: a bibliographical essay’, Polity 1, pp. 388–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • FryB. R., and WintersR. F.: 1970, ‘The politics of redistribution’, The American Political Science Review, 64, pp. 508–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • GodwinR. K., and ShepardW. B.: 1976, ‘A re-examination based on theories of representative government’, The American Political Science Review 70, pp. 1127–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrummJ. G.: 1971, ‘The effects of legislative structure on legislative performance’, pp. 298–322 in R. I.Hofferbert and I.Sharkansky (eds.), State and Urban Politics (Little, Brown & Co., Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • HermanE. S.: 1981, Corporate Control, Corporate Power (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • HicksA., FriedlandR., and JohnsonE.: 1978, ‘Class power and state policy: the case of large business corporations, labor unions and governmental redistribution in the American states’, The American Sociological Review 43, pp. 302–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • HofferbertR. I.: 1966, ‘The relation between public policy and some structural and environmental variables in the American states’, The American Political Science Review 60, pp. 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundley, R. S.: 1974, ‘Social structural determinants of redistributive policy in the American states: a comparative analysis’, M.S. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

  • JenningsE. T. Jr.: 1979, ‘Competition, constituencies, and welfare policies in American states’, The American Political Science Review 73, pp. 414–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • KeyV. O. Jr.: 1949, Southern Politics in State and Nation (Alfred A. Knopf, New York), esp. pp. 298–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • LipsetS. M.: 1960 Political Man (Doubleday, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • LockardD.: 1959, New England State Politics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.), pp. 320–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • NichollsW.: 1960, Southern Tradition and Regional Progress (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • RoederP. W.: 1976, Stability and Change in the Determinants of State Expenditures (Sage Professional Papers in American Politics 3, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif.).

    Google Scholar 

  • StrouseJ. C., and JonesP.: 1974, ‘Federal aid: the forgotten variable in state policy research’, The Journal of Politics, 36, pp. 200–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • TuckerH. J.: 1982, ‘Interparty competition in the American states’, American Politics Quarterly 10, pp. 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • UslanerE. M.: 1978, ‘Comparative state policy information, interparty competition, and malapportionment: a new look at “V. O. Key's hypotheses”’, The Journal of Politics 40, pp. 409–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • WalkerJ. L.: 1969, ‘The diffusion of innovations among the American states’, The American Political Science Review 63, pp. 880–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • YoungR. C.: 1978, ‘Poverty and inequality in the United States: a non-Marxist explanation’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • YoungR. C.: 1981, ‘The social structure of social problems in New York State’, Social Indicators Research 10, pp. 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • YoungR. C., and MacCannellD. 1979, ‘Predicting the quality of life in the United States’, Social Indicators Research 6, pp. 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • YoungR. C., and MorenoJ. A.: 1965, ‘Economic development and social rigidity: a comparative study of the forty-eight states’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 13, pp. 439–452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, R.C., Rolleston, G.L. & Geisler, C.C. Competitive structure and fiscal policy. Soc Indic Res 14, 421–452 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300451

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300451

Keywords

Navigation