Skip to main content
Log in

Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse

II. The role of female dispersion

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The degree to which male sage grouse select lek sites and females select nesting sites to maximize proximity to the other sex was examined by contrasting male dispersions with the dispersions and movements of females in the months preceeding incubation. Wintering females exhibit highly overlapping ranges due to shared use of central refuging areas. In late winter and early spring, females move an average 9 km from wintering areas to select nest sites and males begin occupying leks. Pooled evidence suggests that females select nest sites independently of male dispersion whereas males adjust lek occupation so as to maximize proximity to females. Relevant observations include females visiting nest sites before leks, moving further to select a nest site than to select a lek, and increasing their distance to leks as a result of selecting nest sites. In addition, males avoid leks until females have moved to within 5 km of the arenas, abandon early season leks as local female densities drop, and exhibit dispersions in which mean ratios of females/male are similar across leks. Contrasts between predicted and observed dispersions of males showed that hotspot settlement models are adequate to explain male dispersions on very coarse scales (2 km or greater); on finer scales, habitat preferences of males and tendencies for males to cluster tightly must be invoked in addition to hotspots to explain specific lek sitings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JD (1982) The home range: a new nonparametric estimation technique. Ecology 63:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehler BM, Foster MS (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. Am Nat 131:203–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry JD, Eng RL (1985) Interseasonal movements and fidelity to seasonal use areas by female sage grouse. J Wildl Manag 49:237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 138–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM, Tsai IM (1986) Hotspots and the evolution of leks. Anim Behav 34:1694–1709

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, Gibson RM (1989) Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse. I. Determinants of temporal variation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun CE, Beck TDI (1976) Effects of sagebrush control on distribution and abundance of sage grouse. Colorado Div Wildl, Fed Aid Wildl Rest Proj W37R, Work Plan 3, Job 8a, Final Report pp 21–84

  • Braun CE, Britt T, Wallestad RO (1977) Guidelines for maintenance of sage grouse habitats. Wildl Soc Bull 5:99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalke PD, Pyrah DB, Stanton DC, Crawford JE, Shlaterer EF (1963) Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. J Wildl Manag 27:811–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn PO, Braun CE (1985) Natal dispersal and lek fidelity in sage grouse. Auk 102:621–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Eng RL (1955) A method for obtaining sage grouse age and sex ratios from wings. J Wildl Manag 19:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Eng RL, Schladweiler P (1972) Sage grouse winter movements and habitat use in central Montana. J Wildl Manag 36:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Giessen KM, Schoenberg TJ, Braun CE (1982) Methods for trapping sage grouse in Colorado. Wildl Soc Bull 10:224–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebenow DA (1969) Sage grouse nesting and brood habitat in Idaho. J Wildl Manag 33:649–662

    Google Scholar 

  • May TA (1970) Effects of sagebrush control on distribution and abundance of sage grouse. Colorado Div Wildl, Job Compl Rep, Fed Aid Proj W37-R23, Work Plan 3, Job 3a, pp 115–138

  • Patterson RL (1952) The sage grouse in Wyoming. Sage Books, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen BE (1980) Breeding and nesting ecology of female sage grouse in North Park, Colorado. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Poley B (1969) Effects of sagebrush control on distribution and abundance of sage grouse. Colorado Div Wildl, Job Compl Rep, Fed Aid Proj W27-R22, Work Plan 3, Job 8a, pp 61–86

  • Schoenberg TJ (1982) Sage grouse movements and habitat selection in North Park, Colorado. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Wallestad RO, Pyrah D (1974) Movement and nesting of sage grouse hens in central Montana. J Wildl Manag 38:630–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward RH, Goldsmith PL (1964) Cumulative sum tests: theory and practice.ICI Monograph 3. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwickel FC, Carveth RG (1978) Desertion of nests by Blue grouse. Condor 80:109–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradbury, J.W., Gibson, R.M., McCarthy, C.E. et al. Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24, 15–24 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300113

Keywords

Navigation