Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchical cluster analysis as a tool to manage variation in germplasm collections

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The potential of using hierarchical cluster analysis to classify entries from a germplasm collection according to their degree of similarity was assessed. Results suggest that similarity is generally greatest among individual entries by country of origin and that hierarchical cluster analysis could be used as a tool to classify entries from germplasm collections according to their respective gene pools, even when no passport data are available. Based on this technique, it is also shown that the segregative potential of entries can be estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariyo OJ (1987) Multivariate analysis and the choice of parents for hybridization in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Theor Appl Genet 74:361–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher MJC, Thomas CE (1987) The inheritance of mechanisms of partial resistance to Erysiphe graminis in spring barley. Plant Pathol 36:66–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt GM (1970) Multivariate analysis approach to selection of parents for hybridization aiming at yield improvement in self-pollinated crops. Aust J Agric Res 21:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Biémont C, Aouar A, Arnault C (1987) Genome reshuffling of the copia element in an inbred line of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 329:742–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick DN (1984) Genetic diversity in major farm crops on the farm and in reserve. Econ Bot 38:161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink WL (1986) Microcomputers and phylogenetic analysis. Science 234:1135–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH (1984) Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. In: Arber W, Illmensee K, Peacock WJ, Starlinger P (eds) Genetic manipulation: impact on man and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • fnGenstat (1980) Reference manual 4.03. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Numerical Algorithms Group, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman MM (1984) An evaluation and critique of current germplasm programs. In: Report of the 1983 plant breeding research forum. Aug. 9–11, 1983. Conservation and utilization of exotic germplasm to improve varieties. Pioneer HiBred International, Des Moines/IA, pp 195–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower JC, Ross GJS (1969) Minimum spanning trees and single linkage cluster analysis. Appl Stat 18:54–64

    Google Scholar 

  • IBPGR (1985) International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Annual Report 1984. IBPGR Secretariat, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeda A, Jendrulek T (1987) Cluster analysis as a method for evaluation of genetic similarity in specific host-parasite interaction (Lactuca sativaBremia lactucae). Theor Appl Genet 75:194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort-Buson M, Guillot-Lemoine B, Dattee Y (1987) Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): crosses between European and Asiatic selfed lines. Genome 29:413–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP (1986) Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci 26:894–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseman JG, Scharen AL, Greeley LW (1965) Propagation of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici on barley and Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei on wheat. Phytopathology 55:92–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JP, Cox TS, Rodgers DM (1986) Cluster analysis of red winter wheat cultivars based upon coefficients of parentage. Crop Sci 26:672–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters JP (1988) Crop variability and its exploitation through germplasm collections: an assessment based on barley. PhD Thesis, Cambridge University

  • Peeters JP, Galwey NW (1988) Germplasm collections and breeding needs in Europe. Econ Bot (in press)

  • Rohlf FJ, Wooten MC (1988) Evaluation of the restricted maximum-likelihood method for estimating phylogenetic trees using simulated allele-frequency data. Evolution 42:581–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR (1986) Phenetic taxonomy: theory and methods. Annu Rev Ecol Sys 17:423–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnoletti Zeuli PL, Qualset CO (1987) Geographic diversity for quantitative spike characters in a world collection of durum wheat. Crop Sci 27:235–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateno Y, Tajima F (1986) Statistical properties of molecular tree construction methods under the neutral mutation model. J Mol Evol 23:354–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe RS (1985) The effect of insignificant characters on the multivariate analysis of simple patterns of geographic variation. Biol J Linn Soc 26:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi F, Falcinelli M (1988) Evaluation of an Italian germplasm collection of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. through a multivariate analysis. Euphytica 38:211–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P.M.A. Tigerstedt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peeters, J.P., Martinelli, J.A. Hierarchical cluster analysis as a tool to manage variation in germplasm collections. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 78, 42–48 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299751

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299751

Key words

Navigation