Skip to main content
Log in

Two models for the evolution of polygyny

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two models of conditions for the evolution of polygyny are treated axiomatically. Both models assume a social system based on female mate choice in situations in which a female is better off if she mates polygynously with an already mated male on a superior territory than if she selects a bachelor on an inferior territory. One model, the competitive female choice model, assumes that the females of a harem compete for the limited resources of the harem and thus that their fitness decreases as co-wives are added. The cooperative female choice model assumes that, within limits, a female's fitness is improved by the addition of co-wives to her mate's harem, as a result of cooperative interactions within the group. For each model, a sufficient set of independent assumptions is provided. Implications of the models are indicated and methods for testing them are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allee, W.C.: Animal aggregations: A study in general sociology, p. 431. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1931

    Google Scholar 

  • Allee, W.C.: Cooperation among animals with human implications, p. 233. New York: Henry Schuman 1951

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, S.A.: Baboons, space, time, and energy. Amer. Zool. 14, 221–248 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, G.A.: A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evol. 24, 546–559 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechner, H.K., Schloeth, R.: Ceremonial mating behavior in Uganda Kob (Adenota kob thomasi Neumann). Z. Tierpsychol. 22, 209–225 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, N.A., Hewitt, O.H.: Nesting and productivity of the Redwinged Blackbird in relation to habitat. Living Bird 2, 7–20 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, 1st ed., pp. 423+475. London: John Murry 1871

    Google Scholar 

  • Downhower, J.F., Armitage, K.B.: The yellow-bellied marmot and the evolution of polygamy. Amer. Nat. 105, 355–370 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J.F.: The social organization of mammals. Handb. Zool. 10, 1–92 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, P.F.: Longevity and the evolution of polygamy. Amer. Nat. 109, 281–287 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S.T., Oring, L.W.: Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A.: The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd ed., p. 291. New York: Dover Publ. 1958

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, S.V., Board, V.V.: Reproductive success of Red-winged Blackbirds in north-central Oklahoma. Wils. Bull. 79, 283–289 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, C.R.: Sexual dimorphism, sex ratios, and polygyny in the Redwinged Blackbird, p. 116. Seattle: Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. of Washington 1968

  • Holm, C.H.: Breeding, sex ratios, territoriality, and reproductive success in the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecol. 54, 356–365 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, P.J.: The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenni, D.A.: Evolution of polyandry in birds. Amer. Zool. 14, 129–144 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P.: Mutual aid, a factor in evolution, p. 223. New York: Knopf 1914

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, H.: Social organization of hamadryas baboons: a field study, p. 189. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press; Basel: S. Karger (Bibliotheca Primatologica No. 6) 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D.: Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds, p. 409. London: Methuen 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, J.: Natural selection and the functions of flocking in birds: A reply to Murton. Ibis 114, 556–558 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenington, S.: The evolution of polygyny in red-winged blackbirds. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Biol., Univ. of Chicago (1977)

  • Mayr, E.: The sex ratio in wild birds. Amer. Nat. 73, 156–179 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, E.: Das Verhalten der Pinnipedier. Handb. Zool. 8, 1–20 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murton, R.K.: Why do some birds feed in flocks. Ibis 113, 534–536 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H.: On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Amer. Nat. 103, 589–603 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H.: Ecological aspects of behavior. In: Avian biology (eds. D. Farner, J.R. King), pp. 513–546. New York: Academic Press 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H.: The adaptive significance of mating systems in the Icteridae, pp. 389–398. Proc. XVth Int. Ornith. Congr. 1972

  • Parsons, T.: Societies: evolutionary and comparative perspectives, p. 120. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutch, A.F.: The parental strategems of birds. Ibis 96, 544–564 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutch, A.F.: Helpers among birds. Condor 63, 198–226 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutch, A.F.: Parental birds and their young, p. 503. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J.: Evolution of polygamy in the long-billed marsh wren. Evol. 18, 252–261 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J., Willson, M.F.: The influence of habitat on mating systems of North American passerine birds. Ecol. 47, 143–147 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M.F.: Breeding ecology of the yellow-headed blackbird. Ecol. Monogr. 36, 51–77 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M.F., Pianka, E.R.: Sexual selection, sex ratio, and mating system. Amer. Nat. 97, 405–407 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger, J.F.: The ecological factors selecting for polygyny in birds. Amer. Nat. 110, 779–799 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V.C.: Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour, p. 653. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd 1962

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altmann, S.A., Wagner, S.S. & Lenington, S. Two models for the evolution of polygyny. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2, 397–410 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299508

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299508

Keywords

Navigation