Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Discomanometry in lumbar intervertebral discs: an experimental study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

Un nouveau système de discomanométrie a été développé et évalué afin d'être appliqué au rachis lombaire. La fiabilité diagnostique de la discographie, de la manométrie et de la discomanométrie (combinaison des deux méthodes) en matière de hernie discale, a été évaluée sur 20 rachis lombaires de cadavres (95 disques intervertébraux). La sensibilité était de 92% pour la manométrie et 78% pour la discographie. Cela indique que 22% des disques présentant une hernie ne pouvaient pas être identifiés par la discographie de routine. La spécificité était de 98% pour la manométrie et 100% pour la discographie, indiquant que les disques intacts pouvaient être aisément identifiés par les deux méthodes. Une combinaison de la manométrie et de la discographie assure une grande sensibilité (98%) ainsi qu'une haute spécificité (98%). En conclusion, la discomanométrie est un procédé diagnostique simple, économique et fiable que l'on peut pratiquer avant la nucléotomie percutanée sans risques ni efforts supplémentaires importants. Elle permet de distinguer les disques intervertébraux intacts des disques rompus avec une grande fiabilité diagnostique expérimentale, ce qui justifie son utilisation chez les patients.

Summary

A new discomanometry system was developed and evaluated for application in the lumbar spine. The diagnostic reliability of discography, manometry and discomanometry (a combination of both methods) was assessed in 20 lumbar cadaver spines (95 intervertebral discs) with regard to the diagnosis of non-contained intervertebral discs. The sensitivity was 92% for manometry and 78% for discography. This indicates that 22% of the non-contained discs could not be correctly identified with common discography. The specificity was 98% for manometry and 100% for discography, indicating that contained discs could be easily identified with both methods. A combination of manometry and discography provides a high sensitivity (98%) as well as high specificity (98%). It is concluded that discomanometry is a simple, cost-effective and reliable diagnostic procedure which can precede percutaneous nucleotomy without additional risks or relevant efforts. It allows the differentiation between contained and non-contained intervertrebral discs with a high degree of diagnostic reliability in an experimental setting, which justifies its further application in patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Adams MA, Dolan P, Hutton WC (1986) The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68:36–41

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armitage P, Berry G (1987) Diagnostic tests and screening procedures. In: Armitage P, Berry G (eds) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 472–483

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brock M, Lutze M (1989) Lumbar disk compliance and degeneration. Surg Neurol 32:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brock M, Goerge H, Curio G (1984) Intradiscal pressure-volume response: a methodological contribution to chemonucleolysis. J Neurosurg 60:1029–1032

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castagnera L, Lavignolle B, Claverie J, Vital J, Baulny D, Senegas J (1987) Test de tolerance discale et discomanometrie. Intérêt diagnostique et prognostique avant chimionucléolyse. Acta Orthop Belg 53:184–194

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castagnera L, Lavignolle B, Grenier F, Baulny D, Senegas J (1988) Etude fonctionelle du disque pathologique par la discomanométrie. Intérêt diagnostique et pronostique avant nucléolyse. Rev Rhum 55:381–388

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castagnera L, Grenier N, Lavignolle B, Greselle JF, Senegas J, Caille JM (1991) Study of correlation between intradiscal pressure and magnetic resonance imaging data in evaluation of disc degeneration. Therapeutic issue with percutaneous nucleotomy. Spine 16:348–352

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herzog RJ (1993) Technology assessment: a case study in diagnostic imaging. In: AAOS Surgeons (eds) Orthopaedic knowledge update 4. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Ill., pp 53–66

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hickey DS, Hukins DWL (1979) Effect of methods of preservation on the arrangement of collagen fibrils in connective tissue matrices: an X-ray diffraction study of annulus fibrosis. Connect Tissue Res 6:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hijikata S (1989) Percutaneous nucleotomy. A new concept technique and 12 years' experience. Clin Orthop 238:9–23

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kambin P, Brager MD (1989) Percutaneous posterolateral disectomy. Anatomy and mechanism. Clin Orthop 223:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kambin P, Schaffer J (1989) Percutaneous lumbar disectomy. Review of 100 patients and current practice. Clin Orthop 238: 24–34

    Google Scholar 

  13. North American Spine Society (1988) Position statement on discography. Spine 13:1343

    Google Scholar 

  14. Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsburg L, Hoaglund FT, Morris J (1985) Percutaneous lumbar diskectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJNR 6:290–293

    Google Scholar 

  15. Panjabi MM, Krag M, Summers D, Videman T (1985) Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimen. J Orthop Res 3:292–300

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panjabi M, Brown M, Lindahl S, Irstam L, Hermens M (1988) Intrinsic disc pressure as a measure of integrity of the lumbar spine. Spine 13:913–917

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quinnell R, Stockdale H, Harmon D (1980) Pressure standarized lumbar discography. Br J Radiol 53:1031–1036

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schultz A, Andersson G, Oertengren R, Haderspeck K, Nachemson A (1982) Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurement of the intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64: 713–720

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IKY, Bishop RB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15:411–415

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weinstein JN, Claverie W, Gibson S (1988) The pain of discography. Spine 13:1344–1348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boos, N., Isotalo, M., Witschger, P. et al. Discomanometry in lumbar intervertebral discs: an experimental study. Eur Spine J 2, 215–222 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299449

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299449

Mots-clés

Navigation