Skip to main content
Log in

Curative surgery for gastric cancer: Study of 166 consecutive patients

  • Société International de Chirurgie-Manuscripts Presented at the 35th World Congress of the International Society of Surgery, Hong Kong, August 1993
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From January 1980 to December 1991 we operated on 295 patients with a gastric carcinoma. In 166 cases (56.3%) surgery was performed with curative intent. In 93 patients (56%) a subtotal gastrectomy was performed, and in 73 cases (44%) a total gastrectomy. In all the cases a D-2 type lymphadenectomy was used. The global morbidity rate was 23%, and in-hospital mortality was 3.6%. The morbidity and mortality rates of these two operations were statistically different. Global 5-year survival estimate for the whole series is 61.3%. Univariate and multivariate analysis according to T and N (TNM classification), the number of positive nodes resected, and the relation of positive per resected nodes, revealed statistically different outcomes. This kind of quantitative classification allowed identification of high risk groups irrespective of site of nodal involvement. Tumors classified as intestinal or diffuse type by the Lauren classification had similar survival curves and 5-year survival estimates (p=0.834). By univariate and multivariate analysis this classification did not reveal a prognostic value in this group of patients. In our opinion, tumor penetration and lymph node involvement are at present the most reliable prognostic factors available.

Résumé

Entre Janvier 1980 et Décembre 1991, nous avons opéré 295 patients ayant un cancer gastrique. Chez 166 (56.3%), l'exérèse a été jugée curative. Chez 93 (56%) des cas, il s'agissait d'une gastrectomie subtotale alors que dans 73 (44%) cas, une gastrectomie totale a été pratiquée. Dans tous les cas une lymphadénectomie du type D-2 lui a été associée. La morbidité globale a été de 23% et la mortalité hospitalière de 3.6%. La morbidité et la mortalité des deux types d'intervention différaient de façon statistiquement significative. La survie à 5 ans de la série en entier a été de 61.3%. Une analyse uni et multifactorielle a pu mettre en évidence une différence statistiquement significative en ce qui concerne la survie par rapport à la classification T-N (TNM), le nombre de ganglions réséqués et le nombre de ganglions envahis/nombre de ganglions enlevés. Cette analyse a permis d'identifier les malades à haut risque, indépendamment du site de l'envahissement lymphatique. La courbe de survie et la survie estimée à 5 ans étaient identiques selon que la tumeur a été classée intestinale ou diffuse selon Lauren. Cette classification n'a pas, pourtant, de valeur pronostique d'après les analyses uni et multifactorielle. A notre avis, la pénétration tumorale et le degré d'envahissement lymphatique sont les deux facteurs pronostiques les plus constants.

Resumen

En el período enero 1980 a diciembre 1991 se operaron 295 pacientes con carcinoma gástrico. En 166 (56.3%), la cirugía fue realizada con intención curativa; en 93 (56%) se realizó gastrectomía subtotal y en 73 (44%) gastrectomía total. En la totalidad de los casos se realizó linfadenectomía “D-2”. La mortalidad global fue 23% y la mortalidad hospitalaria 3.6%. Las tasas de mortalidad y morbilidad de estas dos operaciones aparecieron significativamente diferentes. La sobrevida global a cinco años estimada para la totalidad de la serie es de 61.3%. Los análisis uni y multivariables de acuerdo con la clasificación TNM, el número de ganglios positivos resecados y la relación positivos/resecados revelaron resultados estadísticamente diferentes. Este tipo de clasificación cuantitativa permitió la identificación de Grupos de alto riesgo independientes del lugar de la invasión ganglionar. Los tumores clasificados como intestinales o difusos (clasificación de Lauren), registraron similares curvas de sobrevida y de sobrevida estimada a cinco años (P=0.834). Mediante el análisis univariable y multivariable esta clasificación no demostró tener valor pronóstico en nuestro Grupo de pacientes. En nuestra opinión, el grado de penetración del tumor y la invasión ganglionar son los factores de pronóstico más confiables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer: The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Part 1. Jpn. J. Surg. 11:127, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  2. Okusa, T., Nakane, Y., Bok, T., et al.: Quantitative analysis of nodal involvement with respect to survival rate after curative gastrectomy for carcinoma. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 170:488, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harmer, M.H.: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (4th ed.). Geneva, U.I.C.C., 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lauren, P.: The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 64:31, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53:457, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, D.R.: Regression models and life tables. J. R. Stat. Assoc. 34:187, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gouzi, J.L., Huguier, M., Fagniez, P.L., et al.: Total versus subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum. Ann. Surg. 209:162, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shiu, M.H., Papacristou, D.N., Kosloff, C., et al.: Selection of operative procedure for adenocarcinoma of the midstomach: twenty year's experience with implications for future treatment strategy. Ann. Surg. 192:730, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bozzetti, F., Bonfanti, G., Bufalino, R., et al.: Adequacy of margins of resection in gastrectomy for cancer. Ann. Surg. 196:682, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roder, J.D., Böttcher, K., Siewert, J.R., et al.: Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma: results of the German gastric carcinoma study 1992. Cancer 72:2089, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bollschweiler, E., Boettcher, K., Höelscher, A.H., et al.: Preoperative assessment of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer: evaluation of the Maruyama computer program. Br. J. Surg. 79:156, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Aretxabala, X., Konishi, K., Yonemura, Y., et al.: Node dissection in gastric cancer, Br. J. Surg. 74:770, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iriyama, K., Asakawa, T., Koike, H., et al.: Is extensive lymphadenectomy necessary for surgical treatment of intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach. Arch. Surg. 124:304, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mori, M., Sugimachi, K.: Clinicopathologic studies of gastric carcinoma. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 6:19, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noguchi, Y., Imada, T., Matsumoto, A., et al.: Radical surgery for gastric cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Cancer 64:2053, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaibara, N., Sunai, K., Yonekawa, M., et al.: Does extensive dissection of lymph nodes improve the results of surgical treatment of gastric cancer? Am. J. Surg. 159:218, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaehne, J., Meyer, H.-J., Moschek, H., et al.: Lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma: a prospective and prognostic study. Arch. Surg. 127:290, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hölscher, A.H., Siewert, J.R., Böttcher, K., et al.: Surgical classification for adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. In: Diseases of the Esophagus, J.R. Siewert, A.H. Hölscher, editors. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 571–578

    Google Scholar 

  19. Diggori, R.T., Cuschieri, A.: R 2/3 gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: an audited experience of a consecutive series. Br. J. Surg. 72:146, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  20. Okamura, T., Tsujitani, S., Korenaga, D., et al.: Lymphadenectomy for cure in patients with early gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis. Am. J. Surg. 155:476, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soga, J., Kobayashi, K., Saito, J., et al.: The role of lymphadenectomy in curative surgery for gastric cancer. World J. Surg. 3:701, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cady, B., Rossi, R., Silverman, M., et al.: Gastric adenocarcinoma: a disease in transition. Arch. Surg. 124:303, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, J.W., Shiu, M.H., Kelsey, L., et al.: Morbidity of radical lymphadenectomy in the curative resection of gastric carcinoma. Arch. Surg. 126:1469, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heberer, G., Teichman, R.K., Krämling, H.-J., et al.: Results of gastric resection for carcinoma of the stomach: the European experience. World J. Surg. 12:374, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  25. Viste, A., Haügstvedt, T., Eide, G.E., et al.: Postoperative complications and mortality after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann. Surg. 207:7, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gennari, L., Bozzetti, F., Bonfanti, G., et al.: Sub-total versus total gastrectomy in cancer of the lower two-thirds of the stomach: a new approach to an old problem. Br. J. Surg. 73:534, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  27. Msika, S., Chastang, C., Houry, S., et al.: Lymph node involvement as the only prognostic factor in curative resected gastric carcinoma: a multivariate analysis. World J. Surg. 13:118, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maehara, Y., Orita, H., Okuyama, T., et al.: Predictors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. Br. J. Surg. 79:245, 1992

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendes de Almeida, J.C., Bettencourt, A., Santos Costa, C. et al. Curative surgery for gastric cancer: Study of 166 consecutive patients. World J. Surg. 18, 889–894 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299097

Keywords

Navigation