Skip to main content
Log in

Predominantly posterior instrumentation and fusion in neuromuscular and neurogenic scoliosis in children and adolescents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the results in 46 patients with neuromuscular and neurogenic scoliosis (average age 13.5 years, range 6–19 years) who had had posterior fusion with a modified Luque technique between May 1985 and June 1992. The main criteria to recommend surgery were curve progression, loss of balance when sitting, control of the head and difficulties in wearing an external orthotic support. The mean preoperative curve was 63°, the postoperative value was 24°, representing a correction of about 62%. The average number of stabilized segments was 13. In 39 out of 46 patients, lumbosacral fixation was included in the construct. Failure of implants, pseudarthroses and major losses of correction in purely neuromuscular scolioses could be avoided by using rigid segmental fixation and a dorsolateral fusion with a mixture of autologous and allogenous bone. The scoliosis most difficult to influence was found to be Friedreich's ataxia. In Duchenne muscular dystrophy the best method of treatment was surgery performed as early as possible, i.e. at the time of loss of walking capacity in the case of a scoliosis exceeding 20° and with two consecutive X-rays proving curve progression. Analysis of our series does not confirm the morbidity and complication rates of previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell DF, Moseley CF, Koneska J (1989) Unit rod segmental spinal instrumentation in the management of patients with progressive neuromuscular spinal deformity. Spine 14:1301–1307

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boachie-Adjei O, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Koop S, Vanden brink K, Denis F (1989) Management of neuromuscular spinal deformities with Luque segmental instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 71:548–562

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradford DS, Lonstein JE, Moe JH, Ogilvie JW, Winter RB (1987) Moe's textbook of scoliosis and other spinal-deformities, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broom MJ, Banta JV, Renshaw TS (1989) Spinal fusion augmented by Luque-rod segmental instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 71:32–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daher Y (1983) Traitement chirurgical de la scoliose neurologique. Thesis, Université de Montpellier, Montepellier

  6. Eberle CF (1988) Failure of fixation after segmental spinal instrumentation without arthrodesis in the management of paralytic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70:696–703

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gersoff WK, Renshaw TS (1988) The treatment of scoliosis in cerebral palsy by posterior spinal fusion with Luque-rod segmental instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glorion B, Rideau Y (1984) La chirurgie orthopédique précoce dans la dystrophic de duchenne de boulogne. Ann Pediatr 2:154–160

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopf Ch, Rompe JD, Heine J (1992) Indikation und Ergebnisse der operativen Behandlung neuromuskulärer Skoliosen. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 130:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leatherman KD, Dickson RA (1988) The management of spinal deformities. Wright, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luque ER (1989) Segmental Spinal Instrumentation bei neuromuskulären Skoliosen. Orthopäde 18:128–331

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maloney WJ, Rinsky LA, Gamble JG (1990) Simultaneous correction of pelvic obliquity, Frontal plane, and sagittal plane deformities in neuromuscular scoliosis using a unit rod with segmental sublaminar wires: a preliminary report. j Pediatr Orthop 10:742–749

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mehdian H, Shimizu N, Draycott V, Evans G, Eisenstein S (1989) Spinal stabilisation for scoliosis in Duchenne Muscular dystrophy. Neuroorthopedics 7:74–82

    Google Scholar 

  14. M'Rabat A, Dubousset J (1988) Traitement des déformations rachidiennes chez l'infirme moteur cérébral. Rev Chir Orthop 74:647–658

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riddick MF, Winter RB, Lutter LD (1982) Spinal deformities in patients with spinal muscle arthophy. Spine 7: 476–483

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rideau Y (1984) Indications thérapeutiques dans la scoliose de la dystrophic musculaire de Duchenne. Rev Chir Orthop 70:567–576

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rideau Y, Glorion B, Delaubier A, Tarlé O, Bach J (1984) The treatment of scoliosis in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 7:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stagnara P (1985) Les déformations due rachis. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stevens DB, Beard C (1989) Segmental spinal instrumentation for Neuromuscular spinal deformity. Clin Orthop 242:164–168

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swank SM, Brown JC, Perry RE (1982) Spinal fusion in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. Spine 7:484–491

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swank SM, Cohen DS, Brown JC (1989) Spine fusion in cerebral palsy with L-rod segmental spinal instrumentation. A comparison of single and two-stage combined approach with Zielke instrumentation. Spine 14: 750–759

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lonstein JE et al (1994) Section XI: Neuromuscular disease. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The paediatric spine, vol 2. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stricker, U., Moser, H. & Aebi, M. Predominantly posterior instrumentation and fusion in neuromuscular and neurogenic scoliosis in children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 5, 101–106 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298388

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298388

Key words

Navigation