Skip to main content
Log in

Rodent common fragile sites: Are they conserved? Evidence from mouse and rat

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nineteen fragile sites induced by aphidicolin in lymphocyte cultures from the laboratory mouse are documented. These sites are compared with previously described fragile sites induced in mouse fibroblast systems, and then with those reported on chromosomes which have been evolutionarily conserved between the mouse and the laboratory rat. Of a total of 38 fragile sites thus far identified in mouse fibroblasts and lymphocytes, only 4 sites are common to the two cell types; 34 sites show no correspondence of loci. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear, but it is possible that these data may indicate some degree of tissue specificity of fragile site expression in the mouse. Eight autosomes in the mouse and rat retain straightforward and nearly complete banding homology. To test the hypothesis that fragile sites are conserved between the two species, we compared these eight autosomes with regard to number and distribution of fragile site loci. A total of 30 fragile sites is distributed over the conserved chromosomes. Only 4 (possibly 5) are common to both species; 18 are found in the rat but not the mouse, and 4 are found in the mouse but not the rat. Of the 4 shared sites, notable differences in frequency of expression exist. Our comparisons show that: (1) a small numer of fragile sites is conserved; (2) a large number of fragile sites is not conserved, and (3) some sites which are conserved are quite different in the frequency at which they are expressed in the two species, indicating that the sites themselves may have undergone evolutionary change. The chromosomes compared between mouse and rat are widely conserved among murid rodents and thereby offer further opportunities to investigate fragile site phenomena in diverse species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger R, Bloomfield CD, Sutherland GR (1985) Report of the committee on chromosome rearrangements in neoplasia and on fragile sites. 8th international workshop on human gene mapping. Cytogenet Cell Genet 40:490–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Britten RJ (1986) Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 231:1393–1398

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant EM (1983) Expression of the fragile X chromosome in fibroblasts. In: Sandberg A (ed) Cytogenetics of the mammalian X chromosome, part B. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 445–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell JK (1984) A photographic representation of the variability on the G-banded structure of the chromosomes in the mouse karyotype. Chromosoma 89:294–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A (1986) Clinical implications and classification of the constitutive fragile sites. Am J Med Genet 23:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Davisson MT (1981) Nucleolus organizer regions. In: Green MC (ed) Genomic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 358–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Dev VG, Tantravahi R, Miller DA, Miller OJ (1977) Nucleolus organizers in Mus musculus subspecies and in the RAG mouse cell line. Genetics 86:389–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Djalali M, Adolph S, Steinbach P, Winking H, Hameister H (1987) A comparative mapping study of fragile sites in the human and murine genomes. Hum Genet 77:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover TW, Berger C, Coyle J, Echo B (1984) DNA polymerase α inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps at common fragile sites in human chromosomes. Hum Genet 67:136–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht F, Hecht BK, Kirsch IR (1987) Fragile sites limited to lymphocytes: molecular recombination and malignancy. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 26:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist GP (1988) Mobile genetic elements in G-band and R-band DNA. In: Daniel A (ed) The Cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 803–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt PA, Burgoyne PS (1987) A tissue-specific fragile site associated with the sex reversed (Sxr) mutation in the mouse. Chromosoma 96:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwu HR, Roberts JW, Davidson EH, Britten RJ (1986) Insertion and/or deletion of many repeated DNA sequences in human and higher ape evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3875–3879

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop BF, Baker RJ, Haiduk MW, Engstrom MD (1984) Cladistical analysis of primitive G-band sequences for the karyotype of the ancestor of the Cricetidae complex of rodents. Genetica 64:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Beau MM (1986) Chromosomal fragile sites and cancer-specific rearrangements. Blood 67:849–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan G (1974) Nomenclature for G-bands in rat chromosomes. Hereditas 77:37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarello JT, Stock AD, Pathak S (1974) Conservatism in the arrangement of genetic material in rodents. J Mammal 55:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Miro R, Clemente IC, Fuster C, Egozcue J (1987) Fragile sites, chromosome evolution, and human neoplasia. Hum Genet 75:345–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R, Morgan SS, Hecht BK, Hecht F (1988) Fragile sites at 4q23 and 7q11.23 unique to bone marrow cells. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 31:47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau JH (1986) A chromosomal segment conserved since divergence of lineages leading to man and mouse: The gene order of aminoacylase-1, transferrin, and beta-galactosidase on mouse chromosome 9. Genet Res 48:175–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau JH, Taylor BA (1984) Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:814–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt MN (1974) Evolutionary relationships between rat and mouse chromosomes. Chromosoma 46:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TJ, Elder FFB (1987) Multiple common fragile sites are expressed in the genome of the laboratory rat. Chromosoma 96:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz MM, Jenkins EC, Brown WT, Davisson MT, Kevin MJ, Roderick TH, Silverman WP, Wisniewski HM (1986) Mouse chromosome fragility. Am J Med Genet 23:491–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmers RN, Sutherland GR (1988) Further localization of ETS1 indicates that the chromosomal rearrangement in Ewing sarcoma does not occur at fra(11)(q23). Hum Genet 78:144–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmers RN, Sutherland GR, West A, Richards RI (1987) Fragile sites at 16q22 are not at the breakpoint of the chromosomal rearrangement in AMMoL. Science 236:92–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach P, Barbi G, Baur S, Wiedenmann A (1983) Expression of the fragile site Xq27 in fibroblasts. I. Detection of fra(X)(q27) in fibroblast clones from males with X-linked mental retardation. Hum Genet 63:404–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR, Baker E, Purvis-Smith S, Hockey A, Krumins E, Eichenbaum SZ (1987) Prenatal diagnosis of the fragile X using thymidine induction. Prenat Diagn 7:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR, Simmers RN (1988) No statistical association between common fragile, sites and nonrandom chromosome breakpoints in cancer cells. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 31:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida MC (1978) Rat gene mapping by rat-mouse somatic cell hybridization and a comparative Q-banding analysis between rat and mouse chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 22:606–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis JJ (1987) Multiple recurrent genomic rearrangements and fragile sites in human cancer. Somatic Cell Mol Genet 13:397–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis JJ, Soreng AL (1984) Constitutive fragile sites and cancer. Science 226:1199–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis JJ, Soreng AL, Bowe AE (1987) Fragile sites are targets of diverse mutagens and carcinogens. Oncogene 1:59–69

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elder, F.F.B., Robinson, T.J. Rodent common fragile sites: Are they conserved? Evidence from mouse and rat. Chromosoma 97, 459–464 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295030

Keywords

Navigation