Skip to main content
Log in

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Update

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently received increasing attention in an attempt to increase the rate of complete tumor resections, combat systemic metastases, and prolong survival in patients with gastric cancer. The available data indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and does not increase postoperative morbidity and mortality. Compared to the results that can today be obtained with primary resection and lymphadenectomy, however, preoperative chemotherapy has so far failed to show a clear increase in the rate of complete tumor removal in patients with resectable gastric cancer. In patients with locally advanced or unresectable gastric cancer, preoperative chemotherapy may cause substantial reduction in locoregional tumor mass and thus increase the resection rate. This finding appears to translate into a survival benefit for those who respond to chemotherapy and have subsequent complete tumor resection. Because of severe shortcomings in the study design of the published reports, definite conclusions cannot be drawn from the available studies. Randomized controlled prospective trials are therefore clearly warranted. Exact pretherapeutic tumor staging, standardized resection and lymphadenectomy techniques, diligent evaluation of the resected specimen, and close follow-up are essential when designing these trials to identify subgroups of patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma.

Résumé

On a récemment souligné l'intérêt, chez les patients ayant un cancer gastrique, de la chimiothérapie néoadjuvante pour améliorer le taux de résecabilité complète des tumeurs, pour combattre des métastases systémiques et pour prolonger la survie. En effet, les études disponibles indiquent que la chimiothérapie néoadjuvante est faisable sans augmenter ni la mortalité ni la morbidité. Comparée aux résultats obtenus aujourd'hui par la résection primitive associée à un curage, la chimiothérapie préopératoire, par contre, ne s'est pas montrée capable d'améliorer le taux de résecabilité des tumeurs estimées résécables à priori. Chez le patient ayant un cancer avancé ou non résécable, par contre, la chimiothérapie préopératoire peut réduire considérablement le volume tumoral et augmenter la possibilité de résection. Chez le patient qui répond à la chimiothérapie et qui a, par la suite, une résection complète de la tumeur, la survie apparaît donc améliorée. An raison d'imperfections dans la conception même de certaines de ces études, cependant, il n'est pas possible de tirer des conclusions définitives. Des études contrôlées, et randomisées, sont clairement nécessaires. Un «staging» préthérapeutique exact, une technique de résection et de curage standardisée, une évaluation diligente de la pièce après résection ainsi qu'un suivi rigoureux sont essentiels dans l'élaboration de ces essais pour identifier le sous-groupe de patients ayant un cancer gastrique qui pourraient bénéficier de la chimiothérapie néoadjuvante.

Resumen

En tiempos recientes ha merecido creciente atención la quimioterapia neoadyuvante en un intento por aumentar las tasas de resecciones tumorales completas, combatir metástasis sistémicas y prolongar la supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer gástrico. La información disponible indica que la terapia neoadyuvante es factible y no aumenta la morbilidad ni la mortalidad postoperatorias. En comparación con los resultados que actualmente se obtienen con la resección primaria y la linfadenectomía, la quimioterapia preoperatoria hasta ahora, sin embargo, ha fallado en cuanto a demostrar un claro incremento en la rata de resección completa del tumor en los pacientes con cáncer gástrico resecable. En los pacientes con cáncer gástrico localmente avanzado o no resecable, la quimioterapia preoperatoria puede causar una reducción sustancial de la masa local-regional, y, por lo tanto, un incremento en la tasa de resección. Esto parece traducirse en un beneficio de supervivencia en aquellos pacientes que responden a la quimioterapia y que luego son sometidos a una resección completa de su tumor. Debido a severas limitaciones en el diseño de los informes publicados, no es posible derivar conclusiones definitivas a partir de la información disponible. Por lo tanto, aparece clara la necesidad de realizar ensayos clínicos prospectivos y randomizados. Una muy exacta estadificación tumoral preterapéutica, la resección estandarizada y la técnica de linfadenectomía, el examen meticuloso del espécimen resecado y un cuidadoso seguimiento son esenciales cuando se diseñen ensayos clínicos y se pretenda identificar subgrupos de pacientes que puedan beneficiarse de quimioterapia neoadyuvante para el carcinoma gástrico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allum, W.H., Powell, D.J., McConkey, C.C.: Gastric cancer: a 25-year review. Br. J. Surg. 76:535, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akoh, J.A., MacIntyre, I.M.C.: Improving survival in gastric cancer: review of 5-year survival rates in English language publications from 1970. Br. J. Surg. 79:293, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roder, J.D., Böttcher, K., Siewert, J.R., et al.: Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma: results of the German Gastric Carcinoma Group study 1992. Cancer 72:2089, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siewert, J.R., Roder, J.D., Böttcher, K., Busch, R., Hermanek, P., Meyer, H.J.: Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 80:1015, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  5. Böttcher, K., Roder, J.D., Busch, R., et al.: Epidemiologie des Magenkarzinoms aus chirurgischer Sicht. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 118:729, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hermanek, P., Sobin, L.H.: Union Internationale Contre le Cancer: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (4th ed.) Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wanebo, H.J., Kennedy, B.J., Chmiel, J., Steele, G., Winchester, D., Osteen, R.: Cancer of the stomach: a patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann. Surg. 218:583, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maruyama, K., Okahayashi, K., Kinoshita, T.: Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J. Surg. 11:418, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shiu, M.H., Moore, E., Sanders, M.: Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric carcinoma. Arch. Surg. 122:1347, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siewert, J.R., Böttcher, K., Roder, J.D., Fink, U.: Palliative treatment from the surgical point of view. In Gastric Cancer, K. Maruyama, editor. 1994

  11. Bleiberg, H., Gerad, B., Deguiral, P.: Adjuvant therapy in resectable gastric cancer. Br. J. Cancer 66:987, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hermans, J., Bonenkamp, J.J., Boon, M.C., et al.: Adjuvant therapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: metaanalysis of randomized trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 11:1441, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  13. Douglass, H.O., Jr.: Adjuvant therapy of gastric cancer: have we made any progress? Ann. Oncol. 5:S49, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  14. Siewert, J.R., Fink, U.: Multimodale Therapiekonzepte bei Tumoren des Gastrointestinaltraktes. Chirurg 63:242, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gunduz, N., Fisher, B., Saffer, E.A.: Effect of surgical removal on the growth and kinetics of residual tumor. Cancer Res. 39:3861, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher, B., Gunduz, N., Saffer, E.A.: Influence of the interval between primary tumor removal and chemotherapy on kinetics and growth of metastases. Cancer Res. 43:1488, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher, B., Gunduz, N., Coyle, J.: Presence of a growth stimulating factor in serum following primary tumor removal in mice. Cancer Res. 49:1996, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher, B., Saffer, E.A., Deutsch, M.: Influence of irradiation of a primary tumor on labeling index and estrogen receptor index in a distant tumor focus. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 12:879, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldie, J.H., Coldman, A.J.: A mathematical model for relating drug sensitivity of tumors and their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat. Rep. 63:1727, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher, B., Saffer, E.A., Rudock, C., Coyle, J., Gunduz, N.: Effect of local or systemic treatment prior to primary tumor removal on the production and response to serum growth-stimulating factor in mice. Cancer Res. 49:2002, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosen, G., Marcove, R.C., Caparros, B.I., Nirenberg, A.: Primary osteogenic sarcoma: the rationale for preoperative chemotherapy and delayed surgery. Cancer 43:2163, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fujimoto, S., Akao, T., Itoh, B.: A study of survival in patients with stomach cancer treated by a combination of preoperative intra-arterial infusion therapy and surgery. Cancer 37:1648, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bonatsos, C., Aust, J., Meisner, D., Poisez, B., Comis, R.: Preoperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma. Proc. ASCO 4:83, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stephens, F.O., Adams, B.G., Crea, P.: Intra-arterial chemotherapy given preoperatively in the management of carcinoma of the stomach. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 162:370, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  25. Preusser, P., Wilke, H., Achterrath, W., Fink, U.: Phase II study with combination etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced measurable gastric cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 7:1310, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilke, H., Preusser, P., Fink, U., Gunzer, U., Meyer, H.-J., Meyer, J.: Preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and nonresectable gastric cancer: a phase II study with etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin. J. Clin. Oncol. 7:1318, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  27. Plukker, J.T., Mulder, N.H., Sleijfer, D.T.H., Grond, J., Verschueren, R.J.C.: Chemotherapy and surgery for locally advanced cancer of the cardia and fundus: phase II study with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Br. J. Surg. 78:955, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ajani, J.M., Ota, D.M., Jessup, M., Ames, F.C., McBride, C., Boddie, A.: Resectable gastric carcinoma: an evaluation of preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. Cancer 68:1501, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ajani, J.M., Mayer, R.J., Ota, D.M., Steele, G.D., Evans, D., Roh, M.: Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy for patients with potentially resectable gastric carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85:1839, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leichman, L., Silberman, H., Leichman, C.G., Spears, C.P., Ray, M., Muggia, F.M.: Preoperative systemic chemotherapy followed by adjuvant postoperative intraperitoneal therapy for gastric cancer: a University of Southern California pilot program. J. Clin. Oncol. 10:1933, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leichman, L., Silberman, H., Leichman, C.G., Laine, L., Kiyabu, R., Stain, S.: Intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastric cancer patients followed by intraperitoneal therapy after successful resection. In Adjuvant Therapy of Cancer VII, S.E. Salmon, editor. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1993, pp. 261–271

    Google Scholar 

  32. Leichman, L., Crookes, P., Leichman, C.G., Garcia, Y., Groshen, S., Silberman, H.: Preoperative systemic chemotherapy for primary gastric cancer followed by intraperitoneal therapy: a final report on 58 patients. Proc. ASCO 13:227, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kang, Y.K., Choi, D.W., Kim, C.W., Lee, J.I., Hong, W.S., Paik, N.S.: The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcome of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: interim report of a randomized controlled trial. Proc. ASCO 11:173, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rougier, P., Lasser, P., Ducreux, M., Mahjoubi, M., Bognel, C., Elias, D.: Preoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced gastric cancer. Ann. Oncol. 5:S59, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schwartz, G., Kelsen, D., Christman, K., Saltz, L., Toomasi, F., Friedrich, C.: A phase II study of neoadjuvant FAMTX (5-fluoruracil (5-FU), adriamycin, methotrexate) and postoperative intraperitoneal 5-FU and cisplatin in high risk patients with gastric cancer. Proc. ASCO 12:195, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kelsen, D., Karpeh, M., Schwartz, G., et al.: Neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy for high-risk gastric cancer. Proc. ASCO 13:195, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fink, U., Schuhmacher, C., Böttcher, K., Busch, R., Dittler, H.-J., Helmberger, H.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with etoposide/adriamycin and cisplatin (EAP) in locally advanced gastric carcinoma. In Adjuvant Therapy of Cancer VII. S.E. Salmon, editor. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1993, pp. 272–280

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miller, A.B., Hoogstraten, B., Staquet, M., Wonkler, A.: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cook, O., Levine, B.A., Sirinek, K.R.: Evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma—abdominal computed tomography does not replace celiotomy. Arch. Surg. 121:603, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sendler, A., Dittler, H.J., Feussner, H., et al.: Preoperative staging in gastric cancer as precondition for multimodal treatment. World J. Surg. This issue

  41. Tio, T.L., Schouwink, M.H., Cikot, R.J.L.M.: Preoperative TNM classification of gastric carcinoma by endosonography in comparison with the pathological TNM system: a prospective study in 72 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 36:51, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lightdale, C.J.: Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of esophageal and gastric cancer. Endoscopy 24:297, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  43. Aibe, T., Fujimura, H., Yanai, H., et al.: Endosonographic diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma. Endoscopy 24:315, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  44. Feussner, H., Kraemer, S.J.M., Siewert, J.R.: Role of laparoscopy in the staging of advanced gastric carcinoma. In preparation

  45. Lauren, P.: The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 64:31, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nekarda, H., Schenk, U., Ludwig, C., et al.: Prognostic impact of free abdominal cancer cells in totally resected gastric cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 20:361, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lerner, A., Gonin, R., Steele, D.D., Mayer, R.J.: Etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced gastric carcinoma: results of a phase II trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 10:536, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kelsen, D., Atiq, O., Saltz, L.: FAMTX versus etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin: a random assignment in gastric cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 10:541, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wils, J.A., Klein, H.O., Wagener, D.J.T.: Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin—a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 9:827, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mai, M., Ogino, T., Ueda, H.: Study on neoadjuvant chemotherapy of Borrmann 4 type carcinoma of stomach and its clinical significance. Nippon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi 20:586, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chung, H.C., Roh, J.K., Park, Y.J.: Locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer successfully resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FADE regimen. Yonsei Med. J. 31:74, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lenz, H.J., Leichman, C., Danenberg, P., Silberman, H., Horokoshi, T., Kiyabu, M.: Thymidylate synthase gene expression predicts response of primary gastric cancer to 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-cisplatin. Proc. ASCO 12:199, 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fink, U., Stein, H.J., Schuhmacher, C. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Update. World J. Surg. 19, 509–516 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294711

Keywords

Navigation