Skip to main content
Log in

The interaction of Hoechst 33258 and BrdU substituted DNA in the formation of sister chromatid exchanges

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) are induced in cultured Chinese hamster cells by treatment with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) or with Hoechst 33258 (H33258) plus BrdU. The SCE frequencies depend upon the number of H33258 molecules available per cell (or per base pair) and the number of brdU molecules available per cell, and not solely upon molarity. In addition, H 33258 and BrdU act synergistically to induce SCEs. At low BrdU concentrations H33258 induces very few SCEs. At high BrdU concentrations and similar concentrations of H33258, however, SCE frequencies are significantly increased. SCE frequencies decrease with time in successively harvested cells because of the depletion of H33258 from the medium due to DNA binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augenlicht, L.H., Nicolini, C., Baserga, R.: Circular dichorism and thermal denaturation studies of chromatin and DNA from BrdU-treated mouse fibroblasts. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 59, 920–926 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergdorf, W., Cervenka, J.: Elevated sister chromatid exchange rate in lymphocytes of subjects treated with arsenic. 15th Ann. Somatic Cell Genet. Conf., Norfolk, Virginia (1976)

  • Bontemps, H., Houssier, C., Fredericq, E.: Physio-chemical study of the complexes of “33258 Hoechst” with DNA and nucleohistone. Nucleic Acids Res. 2, 971–984 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewen, J.G., Peacock, W.J.: The effect of tritiated thymidine on sisterchromatid exchange in a ring chromosome. Mutation Res. 7, 433–440 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaganti, R.S., Schonberg, A., German, J.: A manyfold increase in sister chromatid exchanges in Bloom's syndrome lymphocytes. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 71, 4508–4512 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Comings, D.E.: Mechanisms of chromosome banding VIII. Hoechst 33258-DNA interaction. Chromosoma (Berl.) 52, 229–243 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofolo, V.J., Sharf, B.B.: Cellular senescence and DNA synthesis. Exp. Cell Res. 76, 419–427 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto, K., Akematsu, T., Shimazu, H., Sugiyama, T.: Simple differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after treatment with photosensitive dyes and exposure to light and the mechanism of staining. Chromosoma (Berl.) 53, 223–230 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttner, K.M., Ruddle, F.H.: Study of mitomycin C-induced chromosomal exchange. Chromosoma (Berl.) 56, 1–13 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, H., Stich, H.F.: Sister chromatid exchanges in agaang and repair-deficient human fibroblasts. Nature (Lond.) 260, 447–448 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt, S.A.: Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 70, 3395–3399 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt, S.A., Stetton, G.: Spectral studies on 33258 Hoechst and related bisbenzimidazole dyes useful for fluorescent detection of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis. H. Histochem. Cytochem. 24, 24–33 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt, S.A., Wohlleb, J.C.: Optical studies of the interaction of 33258 Hoechst with DNA, chromatin and metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 52, 297–316 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., Lin, D., Riggs, A.D.: Histones bind more tightly to bromodeoxyuridine-substituted DNA than to normal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 3, 2183–2191 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., Riggs, A.D.: The binding of lac repressor and the catabolite gene activator protein to halogen-substituted analogues of poly[d(A-T)]. Biochem. biophys. Acta (Amst.) 432, 185–191 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, P., Wolff, S.: New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature (Lond.) 251, 156–158 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocchi, A., Prantera, G., Pimpinelli, S., DiCastro, M.: Effect of Hoechst 33258 on Chinese hamster chromosomes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 56, 41–46 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetka, D.G., Wolff, Sheldon: Sister chromatid exchange as an assay for genetic damage induced by mutagen/carcinogens. Part I. In vivo test for compounds requiring metabolic activation. Mutation Res. 41, 333–342 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetka, D.G., Wolff, Sheldon: Sister chromatid exchange as an assay for genetic damage induced by mutagen/carcinogens. Part II. In vitro test for compounds requiring metabolic activation. Mutation Res. 41, 343–350 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetton, G., Latt, S.A., Davidson, R.L.: 33258 Hoechst enhancement of the photosensitivity of bromodeoxyuridine-substituted cells. Somatic Cell Genet. 2, 285–290 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.H.: Sister chromatid exchanges in tritium labeled chromosomes. Genetics 43, 515–529 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terasima, T., Tolmach, L.J.: Changes in X-ray sensitivity of HeLa cells during the division cycle. Nature (Lond.) 190, 1210–1211 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice, R., Chaillet, I., Schneider, E.L.: Demonstration of spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in vivo. Exp. Cell Res. 102, 426–429 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S., Perry, P.: Differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography. Chromosoma (Berl.) 48, 341–353 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stetka, D.G., Carrano, A.V. The interaction of Hoechst 33258 and BrdU substituted DNA in the formation of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 63, 21–31 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292939

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292939

Keywords

Navigation