Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The theoretical and empirical structure of general well-being

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive set of variables that have been supported as contributing to overall health and general well-being were analyzed to determine their simple structure using factor analysis and their relative contribution using Pearson correlation. The contributors to general well-being had been theoretically grouped into: emotions, beliefs, temperaments, behaviors, sittuations, experiences and health. The empirical factor structure was compared with the theoretical structure used to develop the variables. Stability was investigated by comparing results with those of another geographically separated group. All subjects were normally functioning working adults. The results demonstrated the feasibility and potential usefulness of using self-report questionnaires with multivariate procedures to measure components of the global general well-being concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. and Crandall, R.: 1976, ‘The validity of measures of self-reported well-being’, Social Indicators Research 3, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A.: 1979, Health, Stress, and Coping (Josey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, R., Ware, J., Davies-Avery, A., Stewart, A., Donald, C., Rogers, W., Williams, K., and Johnston, S.: 1979, ‘Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand's Health Insurance Study’, Medical Care 17(1).

  • Dimsdale, J.: 1988, ‘A perspective on type A behavior and coronary disease’, New England Journal of Medicine 318(2), 110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, B., Holmstrom, E., and Wearing, A.: 1984, ‘Well-being and ill-being: different dimensions’, Social Indicators Research 14, 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Health risk appraisals”: 1985, Pathfinders (NHIC, Washington D.C.).

  • Nie, N., Hull, C., Jenkins, J., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D.: 1975, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, T. and Livieratos, B.: 1978, ‘Interpreting a general index of subjective well-being’, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 56(4), 531–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R.: 1981a, ‘Factors of general well-being’ (Doctoral Dissertation, St Louis University, 1980). Dissertation Abstract International 42(4), 1593-B (University Microfilms No. 81-20657).

  • Wheeler, R.: 1981b, ‘Factors of well-being and health promotion’, Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Society of Prospective Medicine (Stevens Point, WT), pp. 60–62.

  • Wheeler, R. and Frank, M.: 1988, ‘Identification of stress buffers’, Behavioral Medicine 14(2), 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, St. Louis University, 221 North Grand Blvd., 63103, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.

    Robert J. Wheeler

Authors
  1. Robert J. Wheeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheeler, R.J. The theoretical and empirical structure of general well-being. Soc Indic Res 24, 71–79 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292651

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292651

Keywords

Search

Navigation