Skip to main content
Log in

More alike than meets the eye: Perceived gender differences in subjective experience and its display

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigated perceived gender differences in subjective experience and its outward display. Subjects imagined a female friend or a male friend in a series of brief situations, each of which was said to elicit a particular subjective experience in the friend. After each situation, they estimated the extent to which the friend would experience the feeling, and also the extent to which the friend would display the feeling to others. Results confirmed two related predictions, both based on attribution research: First, perceived gender-related differences in the outward display of an experience were generally greater than perceived gender-related differences in the subjective experience itself. Males and females, that is, were generally viewed as more alike in their internal feelings than in their overt behaviors. Second, perceived female/male differences in outward display varied more with the feeling elicited by the situation than perceived female/male differences in subjective experience. Specifically, subjects estimated that females would display communal, socially desirable feelings more than males and self-oriented, less desirable feelings less than males, but that females would experience both categories of feelings somewhat more intensely than males would experience them. In addition to confirming these two predictions, our results also indicated that the sex viewed as having greater hidden feelings—operationalized as the amount by which estimations of subjective experience exceeded estimations of display—also varied with the situation. With communal, highly desirable feelings, males were viewed as having greater hidden feelings, but with self-oriented, less desirable feelings, females were viewed as having greater hidden feelings. This pattern did not interact with gender of perceiver. The data, however, indicated that female perceivers tended to rate both males and females higher on measures of both experience and display than males did, and that male perceivers tended to perceive greater gender differences than females did.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakan, D. The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Fish, D. The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 1983, 14, 237–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationship among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 991–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. Sex differences in empathy and related behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 712–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. T. The heart on the sleeve and the secret self: Estimations of hidden emotion in self and acquaintances. Journal of Personality, 1987, 55, 563–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. Z. The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, P. S., Vogel, S. R., Bee, H., Broverman, I. K., & Broverman, D. M. Sex role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimanoff, S. B. Verbal references to emotions. Psychological Documents, 1985, 15 (Ms. No. 2689).

  • Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 3rd ed., Vol. 2. New York: Random House, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting-out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1673–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Bennett, S. M. The definition of sex stereotypes via the adjective check list. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Feldman, L. S. Actions and occurrences in attribution theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant to the senior author from the Academic Senate of the University of California at Davis. Our thanks go to Stephanie A. Shields and Nancy Struthers for their useful comments on a prior version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, J.T., Shulman, G.A. More alike than meets the eye: Perceived gender differences in subjective experience and its display. Sex Roles 19, 67–79 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292465

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292465

Keywords

Navigation