Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of chromosome replication by a BrdU antibody technique

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosome replication was studied without synchronization in human lymphocyte and amniotic cell cultures visualizing very short 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) pulses by an immunologic technique (BAT). The findings agree in general with those facts known from earlier BrdU staining techniques. The very high sensitivity of BAT was shown to allow the detection of replication in a band where 1 in 200 nucleotides is replaced by BrdU. The main observations are: though the replication patterns after BAT appear strange the bands correspond to those described by the Paris Conference (1971). At the beginning of the S-phase a stepwise onset of replication in only a subset of R-bands is confirmed. There is a considerable difference in the sensitivity between early and late S (SE and SL) for the detection of BrdU pulses. This difference probably reflects a different spatial arrangement of chromatin in R-bands as compared with G-bands below the level of cytogenetic analysis. The use of short pulses did not reveal any additional subdivision of SE or SL. The correspondence between chromosomal bands and replicon clusters is discussed briefly with respect to the different time they need for replication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolph S (1988) In situ nick translation distinguishes between C- band positive regions on mouse chromosomes. Chromosoma 96:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg AC, McNally NJ, Shrieve DC, Kärcher H (1985) A method to measure the duration of DNA synthesis and the potential doubling time from a single sample. Cytometry 6:620–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderon D, Schnedl W (1973) A comparison between quinacrine fluorescence banding and 3H-thymidine incorporation. Humangenetik 18:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Calza RE, Eckhardt L, DelGiudice T, Schildkraut CL (1984) Changes in gene position are accompanied by a change in time of replication. Cell 36:689–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo M, Cervenka J (1982) Patterns of DNA replication of human chromosomes. II. Replication map and replication model. Am J Hum Genet 34:757–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeare F, Gratzner H, Pallavicini MG, Gray JW (1983) Flow cytometric measurement of total DNA content and incorporated bromodeoxyuridine. Cell Biol 80:5573–5577

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B (1975) Traitements discontinus par le BrdU et coloration par l'acridine orange: obtention de marquages R, Q et intermediaires. Chromosoma 52:261–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Laurant C, Couturier J, Lejeune J (1973) Coloration par l'acridine orange de chromosomes préalablement traités par le 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUDR). C R Acad Sci 276:3179–3181

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Couturier CL, Viegas Pegnignont E (1976) Sequence of DNA replication in 227 R and Q-bands of human chromosomes using a BrdU treatment. Chromosoma 58:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox MH (1980) A model for the computer analysis of synchronous DNA distributions obtained by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1:71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganner E, Evans HJ (1971) The relationship between pattern of DNA replication and of quinacrine fluorescence in the human chromosome complement, Chromosoma 35:326–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerset RA, McCarthey BJ (1977) Limited accessibility of chromatin satellite DNA to RNA polymerase from E. coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:4337–4340

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand R (1978) Eucaryotic DNA: Organization of the genome for replication. Cell 15:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist GP (1987) Role of replication time in the control of tissue-specific gene expression. Am J Hum Genet 40:151–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaelbling M, Miller DA, Miller DJ (1984) Restriction enzyme banding of mouse metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 90:128–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapp LN, Painter RB (1982) X ray inhibition of DNA synthesis at discrete times during S phase in synchronous human diploid fibroblasts. Radiat Res 89:424–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Karube T, Watanabe S (1988) Analysis of the chromosomal DNA replication pattern using the bromodeoxyuridine labelling method. Cancer Res 48:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim MA, Johannsmann R, Grzeschik K-H (1975) Giemsa staining of the sites replicating DNA early in human lymphocyte chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 15:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA (1973) Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3395–3399

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau YF, Arrighi E (1981) Studies of mammalian chromosome replication. II. Evidence for the existence of defined chromosome replicating units. Chromosoma 83:721–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris Conference (1971) Standardization in human cytogenetics. Birth defects: Original article series, VIII: 7,1972. The National Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KS, Savage JRK, Papworth DG (1988) Replication kinetics of X chromosomes in fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Hum Genet 79:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter A, Hand R (1979) DNA replication during a serum-induced S-phase in primate CV — 1 cells. Exp Cell Res 121:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage JRK, Bhunya SP (1980) Cytological sub-division of S-phase in the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Chromosoma 77:169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage JRK, Prasad R (1984) Cytological subdivision of S-phase of human cells in asychronous culture. J Med Genet 21:204–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage JRK, Prasad R, Papworth DG (1984) Subdivision of S phase and its use for comparative purposes in cultured human cells. J Theor Biol 111:355–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Schempp W, Vogel W (1978) Decrease of DNA synthesis in amniotic fluid cells during the middle part of S-phase revealed by differential chromosome staining after incorporation of BrdU. Chromosoma 67:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid (1963) DNA replication patterns of human chromosomes. Cytogenetics 2:175–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M (1980) Two phases of DNA replication in human cells. Chromosoma 75:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher HG, Wolf U (1974) Methods in human cytogenetics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwemmle S, Mehnert K, Vogel W (1989) How does inactivation change timing of replication in the human X-chromosome. Hum Genet 83:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheck LE, Muirhead KA, Horan PK (1980) Evaluation of the S phase distribution of flow cytometric DNA histograms by autoradiography and computer algorithms. Cytometry 1:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Speit G (1984) Considerations on the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromosomes. Hum Genet 67:264–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Speit G, Haupter S (1985) On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of bromodeoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes. II. Differences between the demonstration of sister chromatid differentiation and replication patterns. Hum Genet 70:126–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Speit G, Vogel W (1986) Detection of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in mammalian chromosomes by a bromodeoxyuridine antibody. II. Demonstration of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 94:103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JH (1960) Asynchronous duplication of chromosomes in cultured cells of chinese hamster. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 7:455–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JH, Woods PS, Hughes WL (1957) The organization and duplication of chromosomes as revealed by autoradiographic studies using tritium-labelled thymidine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 43:122–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel W, Reisacher A (1987) The proportion of G- and R-band chromatin determined by comparison of replication patterns and FCM-analysis. In: Burger C, Ploem JS, Goertter K (eds) Clinical cytometry. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel W, Speit G (1986) Cytogenetic replication studies with short thymidine pulses in bromodeoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes of different mouse cell lines. Hunt Genet 72:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel W, Schempp W, Sigwarth I (1978) Comparison of thymidine, fluorodeoxyuridine, hydroxyurea and methotrexate blocking at the G/S-phase transition of cell cycle studied by replication patterns. Hum Genet 45:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel W, Autenrieth M, Speit G (1986) Detection of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in mammalian chromosomes by a bromodeoxyuridine-antibody. Hum Genet 72:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurov YB (1980) Rate of DNA replication fork movement within a single mammalian cell. J Mol Biol 136:339–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogel, W., Autenrieth, M. & Mehnert, K. Analysis of chromosome replication by a BrdU antibody technique. Chromosoma 98, 335–341 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292386

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292386

Keywords

Navigation