Summary
This experiment was designed to study the relationship between rate of inbreeding and observed inbreeding depression of larval viability, adult fecundity and cold shock mortality in Drosophila melanogaster. Rates of inbreeding used were full-sib mating and closed lines of N=4 and N=20. Eight generations of mating in the N=20 lines, three generations in the N=4 lines and one generation of full-sib mating were synchronised to simultaneously produce individuals with an expected level of inbreeding coefficient (F) of approximately 0.25. Inbreeding depression for the three traits was significant at F=0.25. N=20 lines showed significantly less inbreeding depression than full-sib mated lines for larval viability at approximately the same level of F. A similar trend was observed for fecundity. No effect of rate of inbreeding depression was found for cold shock mortality, but this trait was measured with less precision than the other two. Natural selection acting on loci influencing larval viability and fecundity during the process of inbreeding could explain these results. Selection is expected to be more effective with slow rates of inbreeding because there are more generations and greater opportunity for selection to act before F=0.25 is reached. Selection intensities seem to have been different in the three traits measured. Selection was most intense for larval viability, less intense for fecundity and, perhaps, negligible at loci influencing cold shock mortality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buri P (1956) Gene frequency in small populations of mutant Drosophila. Evolution 10: 367–402
Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York
Ehiobu NG (1985) The prediction of heterosis. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, Graduate School of Tropical Veterinary Science, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Australia
Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London New York.
Goddard ME, Ahmed AM (1982) The use of genetic distance between cattle breeds to predict the heterosis in crosses. Proc. 2nd World Congr on Genet Appl to Livestock Prod, Madrid 8: 377–382
Gromko MH, Pyle DW (1978) Sperm competition, male fitness and repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 32: 588–593
Kerr WE, Wright S (1954 a) Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Forked. Evolution 8: 172–177
Kerr WE, Wright S (1954 b) Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Aristapedia and spineless. Evolution 8: 293–302
Latter BDH, Robertson A (1962) The effects of inbreeding and artificial selection on reproductive fitness. Genet Res 3: 110–138
Nei M (1976) Mathematical models of speciation and genetic distance. In: Karlin S, Nevo E (eds) Population Genetics and Ecology. Academic Press, New York, pp 723–765
Tantawy AO (1952) Changes in genetic variability with different intensities of inbreeding. Drosophila Inform Serv 26: 123–125
Tantawy AO (1957 a) Genetic variance of random-inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster in relation to coefficients of inbreeding. Genetics 42: 121–136
Tantawy AO (1957 b) Heterosis and genetic variance in hybrids between inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster in relation to the level of homozygosity. Genetics 42: 535–543
Tantawy AO, Reeve ECR (1956) Studies in quantitative inheritance. IX. The effect of inbreeding at different rates in Drosophila melanogaster. Z Indukt Abstam Vererbungsl 87: 645–667
Wright S, Kerr WE (1954) Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Bar. Evolution 8: 225–240
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J.S.F. Barker
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ehiobu, N.G., Goddard, M.E. & Taylor, J.F. Effect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster . Theoret. Appl. Genetics 77, 123–127 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292326
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292326