Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of three methods of assessing renal function

  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a study of 100 patients referred for assessment of renal function a comparison is made between gamma camera computer assisted displays of 99mTc-DTPA(Sn) nephrograms, intra-venous urography (I. V. U.) and triple probe 131I-Hippuran renography. The computer processed data displays renal morphology and activity/time curves which are deconvolved enabling quantitative assessment of glomerular function to be made. Pattern recognition techniques for feature extraction are employed to facilitate classification of the curves. It is concluded that the computer processed data gives better results both in the recognition of morphological defects and in the indication and measurement of renal damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Diffey BL, Hall FM, Corfield JR (1976) The 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scan with deconvolution analysis. J Nucl Med 17:352–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AS (1977) Radioisotope renal function studies using principal components. SITEL-ULg Seminar on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, 9.9.11.7. Sitel Liège

  • Houston AS, Macleod MA, Sampson WFD (1979) Principal components analysis as an aid to classification of renal dynamic studies. Eur J Nucl Med 4:295–299

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod MA (1977) Assessment of renal function using 99mTc-DTPA(Sn). J. RN Med Serv 63:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod MA, Sampson WFD, Houston AS (1977) Urinary clearance of 113mIn-DTPA and 99mTc-DTPA(Sn) measured by external arm counting. Urol Res 5:71–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macleod, M.A., Houston, A.S. A comparison of three methods of assessing renal function. Eur J Nucl Med 6, 183–189 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290562

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290562

Keywords

Navigation