Abstract
The compound eye of the housefly Musca domestica L. contains two different types of receptors. The visual acuity of the eye is determined by the divergence angle Δϕ between the optical axes of neighbouring ommatidia. Δϕ and its dependence on the mean pattern brightness is determined by an evaluation of the optomotor responses elicited from various test patterns. Based on the assumption that the visual fields of both types of receptors approximate the shape of a spatial Gaussian distribution they can be characterized by their half-width, designated as the acceptance angle ΔQ. The contrast transfer from the optical environment onto the receptor cells is limited by ΔQ. It is shown experimentally that ΔQ depends on the mean environmental brightness. The characteristic values Δϕ and ΔQ constitute the limiting factors for the light flux received by the receptors. The light flux Φ exciting the receptor cells is proportional to (ΔQ·Δϕ)2. If the product ΔQ·Δϕ is kept constant, there exists a certain ratio \(\frac{{\Delta _\rho }}{{\Delta _\varphi }}\) that leads to an optimal combination of both, contrast transfer and resolution. The ratio \(\frac{{\Delta _\rho }}{{\Delta _\varphi }}\) is experimentally determined and compared with the optimal condition. The torque exerted by fixed flying Muscae has been used as a measure of the reaction strength of the optomotor response elicited by the rotation of cylindrical patterns consisting of periodic distributions of surface brightness. The responses were investigated under different spatial wavelengths, contrasts, contrast frequencies and mean pattern brightness. Detailed results are:
-
1.
The visual acuity (optical resolution power) of the compound eye of Musca is determined by the divergence angle Δ ϕ between the optical axes of those adjacent ommatidia which are not positioned in the same horizontally oriented row but — closer together — in neighboured rows.
-
2.
Δϕ and consequently also the visual acuity do not depend on the mean environmental brightness.
-
3.
The acceptance angle ΔQ changes with the mean brightness of the environment. According to experimental conditions only the minimal acceptance angle Δ min can be experimentally determined. Δ min decreases with increasing mean pattern brightness from 3.6°–4.1° to 1.7°.
-
4.
The decrease of ΔQ min with increasing mean pattern brightness is not caused by a change of the acceptance angles of single receptors. The present tentative explanation is that the centrally located receptors No. 7 and 8 are participating in the uptake of relevant visual information at a critical brightness level.
-
5.
Near the optomotor threshold the large acceptance angle ΔQ min=3.6° at very dim light would thus be associated with the receptors No. 1 to 6, whereas the smaller acceptance angle ΔQ min=1.7° with the receptors No. 7 and 8.
-
6.
Due to a sample spacing of Δϕ=2°, the acceptance angles of neighbouring receptors No. 1 to 6 show a considerable overlap.
-
7.
Based on anatomical data, the difference in absolute light sensitivity for both receptor systems is calculated. It is predicted that the absorption rate of light quanta in the less sensitive system of the receptors No. 7 and 8 should be reduced by a factor of 24–48 compared to the more sensitive system of the receptors No. 1 to 6. This factor nicely meets the experimentally determined brightness thresholds of both receptor systems.
-
8.
The optimal condition \(\frac{{\Delta _\rho }}{{\Delta _\varphi }}\) is nearly fulfilled by the receptor system No. 7 and 8 of Musca. The experimentally determined ratio amounts to \(\frac{{\Delta _\rho }}{{\Delta _\varphi }}\)=0.83. For the receptor system No. 1 to 6 one finds \(\frac{{\Delta _\rho }}{{\Delta _\varphi }}\)=1.86; in that system the transfer of spatial wavelengths is mainly limited by the reduced contrast transfer which drops to low values before the optical resolution limit is reached.
-
9.
Based on the hypothesis that movement perception of the fly Musca is due to a correlation of sensory data one would expect an optomotor peak reaction at a spatial wavelength of λ max=8° and a decrease of the optomotor response towards longer spatial wavelengths. The experimental data are in conflict with these predictions. The present notion is that the absence of the expected reaction decrease is not likely to be caused by a saturation effect in the reaction but rather is explainable in terms of a receptor system consisting of larger numbers of receptor types No. 1 to 6 whose excitations being summed before a correlation evaluation takes place.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Autrum, H.J., v. Zwehl, V.: Die spektrale Empfindlichkeit einzelner Sehzellen des Bienenauges. Z. vergl. Physiol. 48, 357–384 (1964)
Braitenberg, V.: Patterns of Projection in the Visual System of the Fly. I. Retina-Lamina Projections. Exp. Brain Res. 3, 271–298 (1967)
Braitenberg, V., Burkhardt, W.: Unveröffentl. Exp. (1970)
Bishop, L., Keehn, D., McCann, G.D.: Motion Detection by Interneurons of Optic Lobes and Brain of the Flies Calliphora Phaenicia and Musca domestica. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 509–525 (1968)
Boschek, C.B.: On the Fine Structure of the Peripheral Retina and Lamina ganglionaris of the Fly Musca domestica. Z. Zellforsch. 118, 369–409 (1971)
Briggs, M.: Retinene-1 in Insect Tissues. Nature (Lond.) 192, 874–875 (1961)
Campbell, F.W.: Trends in Physiological Optics. In: Processing of Optical Data by Organisms and by Machines. Reichardt, W., Ed. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” (1969)
Eckert, H.: Die spektrale Empfindlichkeit des Komplexauges von Musca. Kybernetik 9, 145–156 (1971)
Eckert, H.: Optomotor Response of the Housefly Musca as a Function of Long Spatial Wavelengths. Ann. Rep. Div. Eng. Appl. Sci., p. 111, Caltech 1972
Eckert, H., Reichardt, W.: Kybernetik (1974), in Vorbereitung
Fermi, G., Reichardt, W.: Optomotorische Reaktionen der Fliege Musca domestica (Abhängigkeit der Reaktion von der Wellenlänge, der Geschwindigkeit, dem Kontrast und der mittleren Leuchtdichte bewegter periodischer Muster). Kybernetik 2, 15–28 (1963)
Franceschini, N.: Sur le traitement optique de l'information visuelle dans l'oeil composé de la drosophile. Thése 1971, C.N.R.S. (Paris) No. A. O. 3802(1971)
Franceschini, N., Kirschfeld, K.: Les phénomènes de pseudopupille dans l'oeil composé de Drosophila. Kybernetik 9, 159–173 (1971)
Gaffron, M.: Untersuchungen über das Bewegungssehen bei Libellenlarven, Fliegen und Fischen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 20, 200–387 (1934)
Götz, K.G.: Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Kybernetik 2, 77–92 (1964)
Götz, K.G.: Die optischen Übertragungseigenschaften der Komplexaugen von Drosophila. Kybernetik 2, 215–221 (1965a)
Götz, K.G.: Verhaltensanalyse des visuellen Systems der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Mitt. Max-Planck-Gesellsch. 6, 346–365 (1965b)
Hassenstein, B.: Wandernde geometrische Interferenzfiguren im Insektenauge. Naturwissenschaften 37, 45–46 (1950)
Hassenstein, B.: Ommatidienraster und afferente Bewegungsintegration (Versuche am Rüsselkäfer Chlorophanus viridis). Z. vergl. Physiol. 33, 301–326 (1951)
Hassenstein, B.: Die Stärke von optokinetischen Reaktionen auf verschiedene Mustergeschwindigkeiten. Z. Naturforsch. 13b, 1–6 (1958)
Hassenstein, B.: Über die Wahrnehmung der Bewegung von Figuren und unregelmäßigen Helligkeitsmustern (Nach verhaltensphysiologischen Untersuchungen am Rüsselkäfer Chlorophanus viridis). Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 659–574 (1959)
Hassenstein, B.: Optokinetische Wirksamkeit bewegter periodischer Muster (Nach Messungen am Rüsselkäfer Chlorophanus viridis). Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 659–674 (1959)
Hassenstein, B., Reichardt, W.: Systemtheoretische Analyse einer Verhaltensweise (der Wechsel-Folgen-Reaktion des Rüsselkäfers Chlorphanus viridis). Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. Freibur 1952, 95–102
Hassenstein, B., Reichardt, W.: Der Schluß von Reiz-Reaktions-Funktionen auf Systemstrukturen. Z. Naturforsch. 8b, 518–524 (1953)
Hassenstein, B., Reichardt, W.: Functional Structure of a Mechanism of Perception of Optical Movement. Proc. 1. Int. Congress Cyb., Namur, 797–801 (1956)
Hertz, M.: Zur Physiologie des Formenund Bewegungssehens II. Z. vergl. Physiol. 20, 579–615 (1934)
Järvilehto, M., Zeltler, F.: Electrophysiological-Histological Studies on Some Visual Cells and Second Order Neurons of an Insect Retina. Z. Zellforsch. 136, 291–306 (1973)
Kirschfeld, K.: Das anatomische und physiologische Sehfeld der Ommatidien im Komplexauge von Musca. Kybernetik 2, 249–257 (1965)
Kirschfeld, K.: Die Projektion der optischen Umwelt auf das Raster der Rhabdomere im Komplexauge von Musca. Exp. Brain Res. 3, 248–270 (1967)
Kirschfeld, K.: Absorption Properties of Photopigments in Single Rods, Cones, and Rhabdomeres. In: Reichardt, W. (Ed.): Processing of Optical Data by Organisms and by Machines. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” (1969a)
Kirschfeld, K.: Optics of the Compound Eye. In: Reichardt, W. (Ed.): Processing of Optical. Data by Organisms and by Machines. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”. (1969b)
Kirschfeld, K.: Aufnahme und Verarbeitung optischer Daten im Komplexauge von Insekten. Naturwissenschaften 58, 201–209 (1971)
Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N.: Optische Eigenschaften der Ommatidien im Komplexauge von Musca. Kybernetik 5, 47–52 (1968)
Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N.: Ein Mechanismus zur Steuerung des Lichtflusses in den Rhabdomeren des Komplexauges von Musca. Kybernetik 6, 13–22 (1969)
Kirschfeld, K., Reichardt, W.: Optomotorische Versuche an Musca mit linear polarisiertem Licht. Z. Naturforsch. 25b, 228 (1970)
Kunze, P.: Untersuchung des Bewegungssehens fixiert fliegender Bienen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 44, 656–684 (1961)
Langer, H.: Spektrometrische Untersuchung der Absorptionseigenschaften einzelner Rhabdomere im Facettenauge. Verh. dtsch. Zool. Ges. Jena, 329–358 (1966)
McCann, G.D., MacGinitie, G.F.: Optomotor Response Studies of Insect Vision. Proc. roy. Soc., Ser. B, 163, 369–401 (1965)
Reichardt, W.: Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems (bei der optischen Bewegungswahrnehmung eines Insektes) Z. Naturforsch. 12b, 448–457 (1957)
Reichardt, W.: Die Verarbeitung optischer Nachrichten im ZNS der Insekten. In: Aufnahme und Verarbeitung von Nachrichten durch Organismen, 109–125 (1961). Hrsg.: Nachrichtentechnische Gesellschaft im VDE
Reichardt, W.: Movement Perception in Insects. In: Processing of Optical Data by Organisms and Machines. W. Reichardt, Ed. Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” (1969)
Reichardt, W., Varjú, D.: Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen. Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 674–689 (1959)
Reichardt, W., Varjú, D.: Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen II. Z. Naturforsch. 22b, 1343–1351 (1967)
Reichardt, W., Braitenberg, V., Weidel, G.: Auslösung von Elementarprozessen durch einzelne Lichtquanten im Fliegenauge (Verhaltensexperimente an der Stubenfliege Musca). Kybernetik 5, 148–169 (1968)
Scholes, J.: The Electrical Responses of the Retinal Receptors and the Lamina in the Visual System of the Fly Musca. Kybernetik 6, 149–162 (1969)
Varjú, D.: Optomotorische Reaktionen auf die Bewegung periodischer Helligkeitsmuster. Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 724–735 (1959)
Vowles, D.M.: The Receptive Fields of Cells in the Retina of the Housefly (Musca domestica). Proc. roy. Soc. B, 164, 552–576 (1966)
Washizu, Y., Burkhardt, D., Streck, P.: Visual Field of Single Retinula Cells and Interommatidial Inclination in the Compound Eye of the Blowfly Calliphora. erythrocephala. Z. vergl. Physiol. 48, 413–428 (1964)
Zeltler, F., Järvilehto, M.: Lateral Inhibition in an Insect Eye. Z. vergl. Physiol. 76, 233–244 (1972)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dissertation des Fachbereichs Biologie der Freien Universität Berlin, 1970.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eckert, H. Optomotorische Untersuchungen am visuellen System der Stubenfliege Musca domestica L. Kybernetik 14, 1–23 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290291
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290291