Skip to main content
Log in

Reactions to pornography on a college campus: For or against?

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years pornography has become a controversial political/moral issue sparking intense debate among a variety of groups. The purpose of the research carried out in 1988 and reported here was to examine attitudes about and exposure to sexually explicit materials for a representative sample of predominantly Caucasian students at a state university in the Midwest. Results indicated that a majority defined pornography as media portraying explicit sexual activities, agreed that adults should have access to sexually explicit materials, and attributed both harmful and positive effects to such materials. Respondents tended to endorse either the views that sexually explicit materials are harmful, do not have positive effects, and should be restricted, or the opposite views that they are not harmful, do have positive effects, and should not be restricted. Women, more religious respondents, less sexually active respondents, and those who had never seen such materials endorsed the more negative evaluations. These students' views are compared with those of a representative sample of the county as a whole, as well as with residents of other locales in the United States. Results are also discussed with respect to four conceptually distinct positions on the pornography issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, L. (1990). Pornography and gender equality: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 27, 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R. L. (1984). A general theory of gender stratification. Sociological Theory, 2, 23–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1980). Let's put pornography back in the closet. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstyn, V. (1985). Women against censorship. Vancouver, BC: Douglas & McIntyre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, P. (1980). Men and pornography: Why they use it. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1971). A conflict theory of sexual stratification. Social Problems, 19, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, C. E., Searles, P., Berger, R. J., & Pierce, B. A. (1989). Conflicting ideologies and the politics of pornography. Gender and Society, 3, 303–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, M. E. (1990). Coercive sexuality in dating relationships: A situation model. Clinical Psychological Review, 10, 395–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S. (1983). Smut, erotic reality/obscene ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M., & Dannemiller, J. E. (1989). Pornography and community standards in Hawaii: Comparisons with other states. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 475–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnerstein, E. (1986). The pornography commission report: Do findings fit conclusions? Sexual Coercion and Assault: Issues and Perspectives, 1, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnerstein, E., & Linz, D. G. (1988). The question of pornography. In O. Pocs (Ed.), Human sexuality. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1980). For men, freedom of speech; for women, silence please. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. London: The Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., O'Dair, B., & Tallmer, A. (1990). Feminism and pornography. Feminist Review, 36, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman-Summers, S. (1986). A comment on the Meese Commission Report and the dangers of censorship. Sexual Coercion & Assault: Issues and Perspectives, 1, 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A. (1983). Gender, gender-role identification, and response to erotica. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1985, November 3). How to get the women's movement moving again. New York Times Magazine, p. 98.

  • Garcia, L. T., & Milano, L. (1991). A content analysis of erotic videos. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 3, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffitt, W. (1987). Females, males, and sexual responses. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males and sexuality. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminer, W. (1980). Pornography and the First Amendment: Prior restraints and private action. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. (1978). Sexual permissiveness: Evidence for a theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 455–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1990). Censorship and the fear of sexuality. In O. Pocs (Eds.), Human sexuality 91/92. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, L. (1980). Introduction. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, W. (1991). The pornography ‘problem’: Disciplining women and young girls. Media, Culture, and Society, 13, 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., & Penrod, S. (1987). The findings and recommendations of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: Do the psychological “facts” fit the political fury? American Psychologist, 42, 946–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottes, I. (1985). The use of cluster analysis to determine belief patterns of sexual attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, 21, 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M. (1984). Aggression against women: Cultural and individual causes. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M. (1989). Distinguishing between the Surgeon General's personal views and the consensus reached at his workshop on pornography. American Psychologist, 44, 580.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1980). Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L. (1986). The Meese Commission: “I told you so.” Sexual Coercion and Assault: Issues and Perspectives, 1, 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L. (1989). The threat to sexual freedom: Moralistic intolerance instills a spiral of silence. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 492–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, V. R., Brislin-Slutz, J. A., & Neal, J. A. (1989). Pornography, erotica, and attitudes toward women: The effects of repeated exposure. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paletz, D. L. (1988). Pornography, politics, and the press: The U.S. attorney general's commission on pornography. Journal of Communication, 38, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palys, T. A. (1986). Testing the common wisdom: The social content of video pornography. Canadian Psychology, 27, 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1986). Journey into sexuality: An exploratory voyage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1990). An end to shame: Shaping our next sexual revolution. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. R., Anderson, R. E., & Sponaugle, G. C. (1980). A multivariate model of the determinants of extramarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 395–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer, R. H. (1984). The X-rated videotape guide. New York: Arlington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgerson, G., & Semple L. (1990). Who watches the watchwomen: Feminists against censorship. Feminist Review, 36, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. E., & Cuvelier, S. J. (1987). Sexual violence in Playboy magazine: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 23, 534–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. (1990). Pornography and violence: What the ‘experts’ really say. Feminist Review, 36, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1990). Sex and the law, Newsletter of the committee on Scientific and Professional Affairs of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex.

  • Weinberg, M. (1986). Unpublished report. University of Indiana, Department of Sociology.

  • Willis, E. (1983). Feminism, moralism, and pornography. In C. Stansell & S. Thompson (Eds.), Powers of desire: The politics of sexuality. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. C., & Abelson, H. I. (1973). Experience with and attitudes toward explicit sexual materials. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We wish to thank Leslie Morgan and Brian Powell for their helpful comments on a draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lottes, I., Weinberg, M. & Weller, I. Reactions to pornography on a college campus: For or against?. Sex Roles 29, 69–89 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289997

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289997

Keywords

Navigation