Skip to main content
Log in

Sex role attitude and perception of psychological abuse

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the relationship between sex role attitude—traditionality and nontraditionality—and perception of psychological abuse. It was hypothesized that nontraditional women would be more adept at perceiving abuse than traditional women. Two hundred and fourteen subjects were polled using the Attitude Toward Women Scale. The 30 most traditional and 30 least traditional women were compared in terms of their reactions to vignettes depicting marital interactions. Several factors were analyzed in an attempt to explain why the nontraditional women were more sensitive in their perception of psychological abuse. Among these factors were educational level, tolerance for conflict, participation in consciousness-raising groups, “psychological sophistication,” and religious background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chodorow, N. The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGregoria, B. Traditional compared with nontraditional women's perceptions of psychological abuse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, 1982.

  • Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. Wives: The appropriate victims of marital violence. Victimology, 1977–1978, 2, 426–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., & Bentler, P. Traditional sex-determined role standards and sex stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25(1), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, J., Gergen, M. M., Quigley, K., & Gergen, K. J. The women's liberation movement: Attitudes and action. Journal of Personality, 1974, 42, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. M., & Fidell, L. S. Characteristics of androgynous, undifferentiated, masculine and feminine middle-class women. Sex Roles, 1979, 5(6), 765–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, P. Psychological abuse of women by spouses and live-in lovers. Women & Therapy, 1984, 3(1), 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. F., & Westoff, C. F. How attitudes toward abortion are changing. Journal of Population, 1978, 1, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmuss, D. The attribution of responsibility in a wife-abuse context. Victimology, 1979, 3, 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, S. Judgments of professional and nonprofessional men and women about psychological abuse in marriage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, 1982.

  • Mason, K. O., Czajka, J. L., & Arber, S. Change in women's sex role attitudes, 1964–1974. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41(4), 573–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, F. Criminological aspects of family violence. In J. Martin (Ed.), Violence and the Family. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. The communication of mental health information: A comparison of the opinions of experts and the public with mass media presentation. Behavioral Science, 1957, 2, 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounsaville, B. Theories in marital violence: Evidence from a study of battered women. Victimology, 1978, (3), 1–2, 11–31.

  • Roy, M. A current survey of 150 cases. In M. Roy (Ed.), Battered women. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J., & Fox, G. L. Sex roles, and family and society: The seventies and beyond. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980, 42(4), 743–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. Helplessness: On depression, development and death. New York: Scribner, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1972, 2, 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, B. Comparing battered and nonbattered women. Victimology, 1978, 3, 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, L. Developmental sex role theory and sex role attitudes in late adolescents. Psychological Reports, 1978, 42, 807–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., & Freedman, D. Changes in the sex role attitudes of women, 1962–1977: Evidence from a panel study. American Sociological Review, 1979, 44, 831–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. The battered women. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. The battered woman syndrome study. In D. Finkelhor, Gelles, R., Hotaling, G., & Straus, M. (Eds.), The dark side of families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeGregoria, B. Sex role attitude and perception of psychological abuse. Sex Roles 16, 227–235 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289951

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289951

Keywords

Navigation