Skip to main content
Log in

Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate dry bean cultivars

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars was compared using regression of genotypic performance on environmental means. Yields of 28 dry bean cultivars differing in plant growth habit and commercial class designation were obtained from 42 Michigan performance nurseries over the 6 year period 1980 to 1985. The determinate type I large-seeded kidney and cranberry bean cultivars had below-average seed yield and large mean square deviations from regression. Lower yielding determinate small-seeded navy cultivars had low deviation mean square values, while higher yielding determinate navy cultivars had correspondingly higher mean square deviations from regression. Although seed yield of cultivars with an indeterminate growth habit was greater than determinate cultivars, prostrate type III indeterminate cultivars had deviation mean square values equivalent to those of large-seeded determinate cultivars. The erect, short vine type II indeterminate cultivars (architypes) had greater than average seed yields and minimum deviations from regression. Compared with other plant types, the architype group showed a greater yield response to more productive environments, with regression coefficient values significantly greater than unity. These results indicate that the type II growth habit offers the breeder the best opportunity of obtaining greater seed yield without incurring loss of yield stability as occurs with the type I and type III growth habits. Since the dry bean cultivars utilized in this study represent two distinct centers of domestication, the regression analysis suggests that cultivars from the predominant genetic center demonstrate more yield stability. A non-significant rank correlation coefficient between the combined and separate analyses for deviation mean square values of large-seeded cultivars implies that commercial dry bean classes should be compared separately based on center of domestication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams MW (1982) Plant architecture and yield breeding in Phaseolus vulgaris. Iowa State J Res 56:225–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver JS, Johnson RR (1981) Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate soybeans adapted to the Northern United States. Crop Sci 21:449–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver JS, Paniagua CV, Coyne DP, Freytag GF (1985) Yield stability of dry bean cultivars in the Dominican Republic. Crop Sci 25:923–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RL (1976) Modifying morphological and physiological characteristics of soybeans to maximize yields. In: Hill LD (ed) World Soybean Research. Interstate Printers and Publ Inc, pp 230–236

  • Coyne DP (1965) A genetic study of ‘crippled’ morphology resembling virus symptoms in Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Hered 56:162–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA (1986) Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and landraces of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.: evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ Bot 40:451–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaderi A, Adams MW, Saettler AW (1982) Environmental response patterns in commercial classes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 63:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson AR, Everson EH, Grafius JE (1978) The gene pool concept as a basis for cultivar selection and recommendation. Crop Sci 18:883–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed M, Francis CA (1983) Yield stability in relation to maturity in grain sorghum. Crop Sci 23:683–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP (1982) A key for identification of different growth habits of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop, New York 25:92–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Gutierrez JA (1984) Geographical distribution of the DL1 and DL2 genes causing hybrid dwarfism in Phaseolus vulgaris L., their association with seed size, and their significance to breeding. Euphytica 33:337–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rheenen HA (1979) A sub-lethal combination of two dominant factors in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop, New York 22:67–69

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Contributions from Michigan Bean Commission, Michigan Bean Shippers Assoc. and Michigan Agric. Exp. Sta., Michigan Agric. Exp. Sta. Journal Article No. 11986

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, J.D., Adams, M.W. & Varner, G.V. Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate dry bean cultivars. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 74, 516–521 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289831

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289831

Key words

Navigation