Skip to main content
Log in

Diallel and generation means analyses for the components of resistance to Cercospora arachidicola in peanut

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The inheritance of the components of partial resistance to Cercospora arachidicola Hori in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) was examined in two five-parent diallels and in the six generations of two single crosses in greenhouse tests. The Griffing (1956) analysis indicated general combining ability (GCA) to be of most importance, yet large ratios of SCA/GCA sum of squares suggested nonadditive genetic variance as well. Reciprocal effects were found for lesion area and lesion number/10 cm2 leaf area. The importance of nonadditive genetic variance was substantiated by the lack of fit for the additive-dominance model in the Hayman's analysis (1954 a, b). Further evidence from the Hayman's analysis indicated that epistasis may be important in determining the inheritance of some of the components of resistance. Additive gene effects alone accounted for the genetic variability observed among the generation means from two single crosses for all components of resistance except latent period. There was evidence that epistasis was an important mode of gene action for the inheritance of latent period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson WF (1985) Combining ability and heritability of resistance to early leafspot (Cercospora arachidicola Hori) and late leafspot [Cercosporidium personatum (Berk, and Curt.) Deighton]. MSc Thesis, Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli LL (1952) An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In: Reeve ECR, Waddington CH (eds) Quanti-tative inheritance. HMSO, London, pp 35–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons RW (1980) The ICRISAT groundnut program. In: Proc Int Workshop on Groundnuts. ICRISAT, Patancheru, AP, India, pp 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid MA, Isleib TG, Wynne JC (1981) Combining ability analysis of Cercospora leafspot resistance and agronomic traits in Arachis hypogaea L. Oleagineux 36:605–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman BI (1954 a) The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman BI (1954 b) The theory and analyses of diallel crosses. Genetics 39:789–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman BI (1961) Notes on diallel-cross theory. In: Hanson WE, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. Pub No 982, National Academy of Sciences, pp 571–578

  • Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stn Circ 347

  • Jackson CR, Bell DK (1969) Diseases of peanut groundnut cultivars in Malaysia. Oleagineux 31:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornegay JL, Beute MK, Wynne JC (1980) Inheritance of resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in six virginia-type peanut lines. Peanut Sci 7:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K (1949) Biometrical genetics. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K, Jinks JL (1971) Biometrical genetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K, Jinks JL (1977) An introduction to biometrical genetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Melouk HA, Banks DJ (1978) A method of screening peanut genotypes for resistance to Cercospora leafspot. Peanut Sci 5:112–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer PC (1976) Effect of defoliation on yield of two groundnut cultivars in Malawi. Oleagineux 31:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet JE (1979) Components of resistance that reduce the rate of epidemic development. Annu Rev Phytopathol 17: 203–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker MD (1985): Components of resistance of peanut to early leafspot (Cercospora arachidicola Hori). MSc Thesis, Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokol MJ, Baker RJ (1977) Evaluation of the assumptions required for the genetic interpretation of diallel experiments in self-pollinated crops. Can J Plant Sci 57:1185–1191

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. MacKey

Paper No. 10172 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, C.C., Wynne, J.C. Diallel and generation means analyses for the components of resistance to Cercospora arachidicola in peanut. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 73, 228–235 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289279

Key words

Navigation