Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that adult readers would identify with story characters who display a similar gender role orientation. Male and female readers rated their identification with male and female characters who acted in either a masculine or feminine manner in short story vignettes. The primary finding was an interaction between gender role of reader and gender role behavior of character: as predicted, androgynous and undifferentiated readers identified equally with both masculine and feminine characters, masculine readers identified more strongly with masculine characters than feminine characters, and feminine readers identified more strongly with feminine characters than masculine characters. Further, androgynous readers identified somewhat more strongly with both types of characters than undifferentiated readers. However, the predicted effect of gender similarity between reader and character did not exert a strong influence on the identification process. In addition, feminine subjects reported greater identification across all four stories than masculine and undifferentiated subjects. Finally, of three questionnaire measures of empathy tested, only Davis's (1983) Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Empathic Concern subscale) significantly predicted general level of identification; as expected, these scores were significantly correlated with femininity gender role scores.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alternbernd, L., & Lewis, L. L. Introduction to literature: Stories, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1969.
Bakan, D. The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 354–364.
Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory and self-schema theory compared: A comment on Markus, Crane, Bernstein, and Siladi's “Self-schemas and gender”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 1192–1194.
Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.
Briggs, S. R., Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. An analysis of the Self-Monitoring Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 679–686.
Chlopan, B. E., McCain, M. L., Carbonell, J. L., & Hagen, R. L. Empathy: Review of available measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 48, 635–653.
Crane, M., & Markus, H. Gender identity: The benefits of a self-schema approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 1195–1197.
Davis, M. H. Measuring individual difference in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 113–126.
Foushee, H. C., Davis, M. H., & Archer, R. L. Empathy, masculinity, and femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1979, 9, 85 pps.
Hoffman, M. L. Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 712–722.
Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F. The development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 1984, 20, 911–924.
Korabik, K. Sex role orientation and impressions: A comparison of differing genders and sex roles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 25–30.
Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42, 38–50.
Mauer, R. A. Young children's responses to a physically disabled storybook hero. Exceptional Children, 1979, 45, 326–330.
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 525–543.
Messmore, P. B. Multi-ethnic reading texts: The role of inferred story character identification and reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1972, 5, 126–133.
Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.
Perrine, L. Story and structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1959.
Pursell, S. A., & Banikiotes, P. G. Androgyny and initial interpersonal attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4, 235–239.
Purves, A. C. That sunny dome: Those caves of ice: A model for research in reader response. College English, 1979, 40, 802–812.
Seyfried, B. A., & Hendrick, C. When do opposites attract? When they are opposite in sex and sex-role attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 15–20.
Snyder, M. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 526–537.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. Masculinity and femininity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1978.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974, 4, 43pp.
Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Zillman, D. Anatomy of suspense. In P. H. Tannenbaum (Ed.), The entertainment functions of television. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
These data were collected while the author was partially supported by a NICHHD Postdoctoral Fellowship at the University of Illinois. Gratitude is expressed to William McCarthy for comments on an earlier version of this paper and Bernard Dugoni for suggestions on statistical analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jose, P.E. The role of gender and gender role similarity in readers' identification with story characters. Sex Roles 21, 697–713 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289178
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289178