Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative aspects of utilization of sulfonate and other sulfur sources by Escherichia coli K12

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selected biochemical features of sulfonate assimilation in Escherichia coli K-12 were studied in detail. Competition between sulfonate-sulfur and sulfur sources with different oxidation states, such as cysteine, sulfite and sulfate, was examined. The ability of the enzyme sulfite reductase to attack the C-S linkage of sulfonates was directly examined. Intact cells formed sulfite from sulfonate-sulfur. In cysteine-grown cells, when cysteine was present with either cysteate or sulfate, assimilation of both of the more oxidized sulfur sources was substantially inhibited. In contrast, none of three sulfonates had a competitive effect on sulfate assimilation. In studies of competition between different sulfonates, the presence of taurine resulted in a decrease in cysteate uptake by one-half, while in the presence of isethionate, cysteate uptake was almost completely inhibited. In sulfite-grown cells, sulfonates had no competitive effect on sulfite utilization. An E. coli mutant lacking sulfite reductase and unable to utilize isethionate as the sole source of sulfur formed significant amounts of sulfite from isethionate. In cell extracts, sulfite reductase itself did not utilize sulfonate-sulfur as an electron acceptor. These findings indicate that sulfonate utilization may share some intermediates (e.g. sulfite) and regulatory features (repression by cysteine) of the assimilatory sulfate reductive pathway, but sulfonates do not exert regulatory effects on sulfate utilization. Other results suggest that unrecognized aspects of sulfonate metabolism, such as specific transport mechanisms for sulfonates and different regulatory features, may exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark HT, Inouye JM (1931) The alkaline deamination of derivatives of cysteine. J Biol Chem 94: 541–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus J, Monty KJ (1963) Coincident repression of the reduction of 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphosulfate, sulfite, and thiosulfate in the cysteine pathway of Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem 238: 3781–3783

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant WM (1974) Colorimetric determination of sulfur dioxide. Anal Chem 19: 345–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda K, Yamada H, Tanaka S (1963) Bacterial degradation of taurine. J Biochem 54: 312–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo H, Anada H, Ohsawa K, Ishimoto M (1971) Formation of sulfoacetaldehyde from taurine in bacterial extracts. J Biochem 69: 621–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Kredich NM (1987) Biosynthesis of cysteine. In: Neidhardt FC (ed) Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Cellular and molecular biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurements with Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaggan D, Epstein W (1991) Escherichia coli accumulates the eukaryotic osmolyte taurine at high osmolarity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 81: 209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak CA, Ellis RJ, Jones-Mortimer MC, Crichton CE (1965) The control of sulphate reduction in bacteria. Biochem J 96: 270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts RB, Abelson PH, Cowie DB, Bolton ET, Britten RJ (1957) Studies of biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington DC, pp 318–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz AP, Leadbetter ER, Godchaux W III (1993) Utiization of sulfonates as sole sulfur source by soil bacteria including Comamonas acidovorans. Arch Microbiol 159: 440–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimamoto G, Berk R (1979) Catabolism of taurine in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochim Biophys Acta 569: 287–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapley E, Starkey R (1970) Decomposition of cysteic acid and taurine by soil microorganisms. J Gen Microbiol 64: 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Uria-Nickelsen MR, Leadbetter ER, Godchaux W III (1993) Sulphonate utilization by enteric bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 139: 203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldrake JF (1967) Intracellular concentration of cysteine in Escherichia coli and its relation to repression of the sulphate-activating enzymes. Biochem J 105: 697–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J-Y, Siegel LM, Kredich NM (1991) High-level expression of Escherichia coli NADPH-sulfite reductase: requirement for a cloned cysG plasmid to overcome limiting siroheme cofactor. J Bacteriol 173: 325–333

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uria-Nickelsen, M.R., Leadbetter, E.R. & Godchaux, W. Comparative aspects of utilization of sulfonate and other sulfur sources by Escherichia coli K12. Arch. Microbiol. 161, 434–438 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288955

Key words

Navigation