Skip to main content
Log in

Gender role orientations and friendship: Some attenuation, but gender differences abound

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an exploration of the degree to which gender role orientations would attenuate differences on a set of variables specified in a friendship model, 105 women and 101 men described themselves and their best friend of each gender on the Bem Sex Role Inventory. They also described their relationships with each friend using the Acquaintance Description Form F. Women's friendships with female friends were especially strong and rewarding as compared to their friendships with men, and as compared to men's friendships with either women or men. There was a modest attenuating effect due to subjects' GROs. Women, but not men, were sensitive to the perceived GROs of friends, with androgynous friends providing the strongest and broadest array of rewards. Contrary to the common conception of women's friendships as expressive and men's as instrumental, the results suggest that women's friendships are both expressive and instrumental.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aries, E. J., & Johnson, F. L. (1983). Close friendships in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9, 1183–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. R. (1981a). Worlds of friendship. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. R. (1981b). Friendships of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 402–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 152–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). A manual for the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. D. (1980). Friendship: How to give it, how to get it. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1972). Sex and social participation. American Sociological Review, 37, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., & Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, S., & Packard, T. (1981). The therapeutic value of friendship between women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. L., & Narus, L. R. (1981). Sex roles and intimacy in same and other sex relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 444–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, H. M. (1981). Blabbermouths and clams: Sex differences in self disclosures in same-sex and cross-sex dyads. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. T., & Stull, D. E. (1981). Sex differences in effects of social and value similarity in same-sex friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 488–5052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F. L., & Aries, E. J. (1983). The talk of women friends. Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 353–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, L. O., & Lombardo, J. P. (1984). Self-disclosure: Intimate and nonintimate disclosures to parents and best friends as a function of Bem sex-role category. Sex Roles, 11, 735–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. (1989). Factors underlying friendship: An analysis of responses on the Acquaintance Description Form in relation to Wright's friendship model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, J. P., & Lavine, L. O. (1981). Sex-role stereotyping and patterns of self-disclosure. Sex Roles, 7, 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., Healy, S., & Kraus, S. (1984). Social motives and patterns of friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 828–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. M. (1985). Same- and cross-sex friendships and the psychology of homosociality. Sex Roles, 12, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1985). Just friends. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, D. (1989). The influence of gender on same-sex friendships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognoli, J. (1980). Male friendship and intimacy over the life span. Family Relations, 29, 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1957). Psychological research. new York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. S., & Wright, P. H. (1976). Self-disclosure in friendship. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 735–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L., & Lowenthal, M. F. (1975). Life course perspective on friendship. In M. Thurnher & D. Chiriboga (Eds.), Four stages of life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. (1985). Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in friendship. Sex Roles, 12, 587–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstead, B. A. (1988). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. In V. J. Derlega & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstead, B. A., & Derlega, V. J. (1984). The therapeutic value of same-sex friendships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Wright, P. H. (1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1984). Self-referent motivation and the intrinsic quality of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1985). The acquaintance description form. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: an interdisciplinary approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1988). Interpreting research on gender differences in friendship: A case for moderation and a plea for caution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1989). Gender differences in adults' same- and cross-gender friendships. In R. G. Adams & R. Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendship: Structure and process. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H., & Bergloff, P. J. (1984). The acquaintance description form and the study of relationship differentiation. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Personal Relationship, Madison, WI.

  • Wright, P. H., & Crawford, A. C. (1981). Agreement and friendship: A close look and some second thoughts. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 2, 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, G. H. (1978). The natural history of friendship: Sex differences in best friendship patterns. Dissertation Abstracts, 39(3-B), 1553.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Terry Schieffer in the data collection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, P.H., Scanlon, M.B. Gender role orientations and friendship: Some attenuation, but gender differences abound. Sex Roles 24, 551–566 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288413

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288413

Keywords

Navigation