Abstract
This research investigates the effect of gender-schematic processing on decisions to reject sex-inappropriate sports. Sex-typed subjects expressly state concerns about the gender appropriateness of the sport more often than androgynous and undifferentiated subjects. Moreover, they rate gender-based factors as more important to their decisions than the latter two groups. Second, we assess whether gender-schematic processing of the self extends to gender-schematic processing of others. When told only that a fictitious person enjoys doing either a masculine or feminine sport, sex-typed subjects are more likely to draw sex-consistent conclusions about that person than are androgynous and undifferentiated subjects. A discussion of cross-sex-typed subjects' responses is included and it is suggested that considering males' responses separately from females' may be more informative for certain experimental tasks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, S. M., & Bem, S. L. Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness of physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41, 74–86.
Bem, S. L. Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 31, 634–643.
Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 354–364.
Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory. In T. B. Sonderregger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1984: The Psychology Gender. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 1985.
Bem, S. L., Lenney, E. Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.
Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 1016–1023.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. Sex-related patterns in the unit of perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977, 3, 297–300.
Dyer, K. F. Challenging the men. The social biology of female sporting achievement. St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press, 1982.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. Social cognition. New York: Random House, 1984.
Fong, G. T., & Markus, H. Self-schemas and judgments about others. Social Cognition, 1982, 1, 191–205.
Frable, D. E. S., & Bem, S. L. If you're gender-schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 49, 459–468.
Gerber, E. W. The American woman in sport. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1974.
Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1965.
Griffin-Shelley, E. Sex role ratings of selected sports by college students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Estern Psychological Association, April 1983.
Harris, D. V. Research studies in the female athlete: Psychological considerations. Journal of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, 1975, 46, 32–36.
Harris, D. V. Femininity and athleticism: Conflict or consonance? In D. F. Sabo & R. Runfola (Eds.), Jocks: Sports and male identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
LaFrance, M. Gender gestures: Sex, sex-role and nonverbal communication. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
LaFrance, M., & Carmen, B. The nonverbal display of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 36–49.
Lippa, R. The naive perception of masculinity-femininity on the basis of expressive cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 1978, 12, 1–14.
Lippa, R. Sex typing and the perception of body outlines. Journal of Personality, 1983, 51, 667–682.
Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 821–831.
Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., Siladi, M. Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42, 38–50.
Martin, C. L., Halverson, C. F. A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 1981, 52, 1119–1134.
Matteo, S. The effect of sex and gender-schematic processing on sport participation. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 417–432.
Matteo, S. The influence of family and peer support systems adolescents' sport participation. Unpublished manuscript, 1987.
Mills, C. J. Sex-typing and self-schemata effects on memory and response latency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 45, 163–172.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1980, 5, 147–163.
Taylor, S. E., & Falcone, H. Cognitive bases of stereotyping: The relationship between categorization and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 426–432.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based upon a doctoral dissertation submitted to the Department of Psychology, Cornell University, 1984. The author wishes to thank Sandra L. Bem, Daryl Bem, and Thomas Gilovich for guidance throughout this work. Gordon H. Bower, Leonard M. Horowitz, Margaret Intons-Peterson, and an anonymous reviewer deserve thanks for their extended comments and discussions of this work. Thanks are also due to Ann Wycoff and Paula Christianson who served as experimenters, to James P. Cunningham for statistical assistance, and James P. Fallon for computer programming assistance. This research was supported by the Department of Psychology, Cornell University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matteo, S. The effect of gender-schematic processing on decisions about sex-inappropriate sport behavior. Sex Roles 18, 41–58 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288016
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288016