Skip to main content
Log in

Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six differences in linguistic behavior in same-sex and mixed-sex problem-solving groups were explored. Small groups of all women, all men, and mixed sex were run and videotaped. Linguistic behavior was assessed through a content analysis of four syntactic categories: intensifiers, modal constructions, tag questions, and imperative constructions in question form. Support was found for the hypothesis of Key (1975) and Lakoff (1975) that women, as compared with men, use more linguistic categories that connote uncertainty. Support was also found for these authors' hypotheses that (1) women use more linguistic forms that connote uncertainty when men are present than when men are absent, and (2) men are more likely to interrupt women than women are likely to interrupt men. The results are discussed from the perspectives of women's role (supportive behavior and minority status) and women's culture (interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. The compassion trap. In V. Gornick & J. B. Moran (Eds.), Women in sexist society. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, N. Sex-typed language: The production of grammatical cases. Acta Sociologica, 1971, 14(1–2), 24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. The sex game. New York: Atheneum, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. My four revolutions: An autobiographical history of the ASA. In Joan Huber (Ed.), Changing women in a changing society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. Some sociological determinants of perception: An inquiry into sub-cultural differences. British Journal of Sociology, 1958, 9, 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. Class, codes and control, I: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 20(20), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callary, R. E. Status perception through syntax. Language and Speech, 1974, 17(20), 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, A. K., & Lee, D. E. Self-destructive consequences of sex role socialization. Suicide, 1976, 6(1), in press.

  • Cooper, M., & Delheimer, V. Personal communication about research in progress, 1976.

  • Gilley, H. M., & Summers, C. S. Sex differences in the use of hostile verbs. Journal of Psychology, 1970, 76(September), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, H. Women as a minority group. Social Forces, 1951, 30(October), 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N., & Freeman, J. The sexual politics of interpersonal behavior. In S. Cox (Ed.), Female psychology: The emerging self. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J. Time and cool people. Transaction, 1967, 4(April), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesperson, O. The woman. In Language: Its nature, development, and origin. New York: W. W. Norton, 1921, 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesperson, O. Sex and gender. In The Philosophy of Grammar. New York: W. W. Norton, 1924, 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemnitzer, L. S. Language learning and socialization. Urban Life and Culture, 1973, 1 (January), 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, M. R. Male/female language. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikpatrick, J. Political woman. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, F. American women and American values. In L. Bryson (Ed.), Facing future risks. New York: Harper, 1953, 175–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Folk linguistics: Wishy-washy mommy talk. Psychology Today, 1974, 8(1), 82–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutner, N. G., & Brogan, D. An investigation of sex-related slang vocabulary and sex-role orientation among male and female university students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1974, 36(3), 474–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. E., & Clifton, A. K. Women as a minority. Unpublished manuscript, Illinois State University, 1976.

  • Rokeach, M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. Abnormal types of speech in Nootka. In David G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G., & Merten, D. The language of adolescence: An anthropological approach to the youth culture. American Journal of Sociology, 1967, 72(March), 453–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trugill, P. Sociolinguistics. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B., & Leonard, W. Usage of terms of sexual intercourse by men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1974, 3(4), 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. Socialization in correctional institutions. In David A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969, 1005–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B. L. Language, thought and reality: Selected writings. J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W. A. sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negroes. Speech at Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C., 1969.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMillan, J.R., Clifton, A.K., McGrath, D. et al. Women's language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality?. Sex Roles 3, 545–559 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287838

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287838

Keywords

Navigation